Advert

Italian architect continues to promote Opera House site proposal

Video: Mark Zammit Cordina

Italian architect Giovanni Trevisan is continuing to promote his proposal for the building of a roofed, 1,600-seat theatre on the site of the Opera House - and he says he knows people who can meet the €15m cost if the government would transfer the site for 30 years.

Mr Trevisan is currently holding an exhibition of his plans at the Hotel Phoenicia in Floriana.

Advert

49 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

R. Caruana

Apr 22nd 2010, 20:41

It would cost millions in sound if applied to such a concept. One has to think about acoustics and soundproofing.

Have you thought about what it would cost to achieve acceptable acoustics within a glass building? As you can see from the plans provided there will only be 'canvas curtains' covering the glass walls during performances. It would be a sound engineer's nightmare to cut down echo and resonance to acceptable levels in such conditions. Materials for such a job do not come cheap and can only be limited to floor and soffit (no walls exist).

To me the whole design is too sketchy.

K Spiteri

Apr 23rd 2010, 08:32

OK. I apologies for misunderstand your whole concept. I thought that you were actually taking into consideration the actual sound & light systems. But if you're taking into consideration as well the soundproofing and acoustics, there you'll be right.

I am opposing the glass structure proposed by Trevisan although I agree with him that there should be stalls, median balcony and top balcony. By that you can achieve the 1,600 seating capacity within the ROH footprint without reducing from the stage & facilities footprint.

R. Caruana

Apr 23rd 2010, 07:12

There is no comparison between the Mater Dei lobby and this proposal.

Mater Dei lobby is a fraction of a much larger complex, used by hundreds if not thousands of people every day. This theatre project would need climate control 24-7 throughout the year when its auditorium (it's largest asset) is being used for not more than 4-6 hours a week when one considers our theatre season and number of performances possible. Here the scale of cost-effectiveness comes into play: at Mater Dei the cost per capita would come down to cents per day, at this theatre it would cost quite a few euros per capita. And it is the patrons of such a theatre that will be asked to foot the bill.

Astrid Vella1

Apr 22nd 2010, 10:51


Well said Ms Galea. As Joseph Calleja put it in a Times blog "What do we have against culture in this country"

Jovan Mizzi

Apr 22nd 2010, 13:41


thanks

Antoine Vella

Apr 21st 2010, 21:43

To say nothing of the window-cleaners' bill.

Astrid Vella

Apr 22nd 2010, 02:20


Your question about the glass walls is a fair comment, maybe a technical person can enlighten us.

Similarly your question whether these designs are similar to Richard England's made me look up Richard England's design which I found here: http://www.search.com/reference/Royal_Opera_House

I think the designs are as similar as any that draw inspiration from Barry's Royal Opera House in a modern idiom with extensive use of glass, however on closer scrutiny, that's where the similarities end. Trevisan integrates all the surviving facade of the Opera House-the entrances and grand steps-into his design,while England's building rises new from the pavement. Trevisan's has echoed the original columns along the sides,while England has a second, cavernous, modern entrance in stone on the side.

The treatment of the roof is also very different, with England opting for a monolithic structure while Trevisan again re-interprets the old theme, complete with trabeation.

Come to think of it, there is one important similarity: the fact that two great architects have both produced designs for full theatres complete with modern facilities on the Royal Opera House site, in spite of all those who tried to convince us that it can't be done.

andreas w gerdes

Apr 21st 2010, 15:42



do I understand this correctly that the offer is to get a fully functioning and well designed opera house with a roof with no costs for the maltese?

if the above is correct some maltese may rise up and stop their funds being applied for a roofless investment which the majority did not approve. starting a movement might not be such a challenge as the linked video shows -


http://sivers.org/ff

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fW8amMCVAJQ

Astrid Vella

Apr 21st 2010, 11:50


It is a myth that we hardly fill theatres as it is. Certainly some performances are less patronised than others, but that is true all over the world. The recent performances of La Sylphide, and also 'the Importance of Being Earnest' were fully booked. We have many sell-out performances which need more space than the present theatres can offer, and cruise ships have often requested large afternoon matinees which cannot presently be accommodated - that and viewing visits from tourists would contribute significantly towards the upkeep of the theatre.

Also don't forget that an increased number of seats would help keep ticket prices down in large-scale performances.

conrad vella

Apr 21st 2010, 12:13

no offence ms.vella.......but are you serious in stating that tourists on board cruise liners that stop only for a few hours, and will have a crammed schedule, will be interested in attending a matinee performance of some sort especially considering that they have free evening entertainment??????

And why the opera house? why not upgrade the MCC theatre? isn't that another jewel in valletta??? and at least it was built by the knights, has an amazing history and is BAROQUE.

Astrid Vella

Apr 21st 2010, 21:43


Yes, Conrad, dead serious. Remember, a high percentage of cruise passengers are elderly and not up to running around all day. Sitting down in a theatre after touring Valletta all morning would is probably a good solution for them, which is why these enquiries have been made.

Why not the MCC theatre? Well these cruise organisers are very professional and have probably discovered that the MCC acoustics are abysmal.

Don't overlook income from tourists who just want to view the theatre either. With a history as chequered as ours would have, it is bound to attract tourists. Italy's theatres are always bustling with visitors, and I'm not talking only about the historic ones either, but also the rebuilt ones like the La Fenice and Bari's Petruzzelli.

Michael Vella

Apr 22nd 2010, 12:55

Thanks so much for your clarification on what opera house means. Point is we do not need a 1,600 entertainment hall or whatever you want to call it.

Michael Mifsud

Apr 22nd 2010, 16:30

Excuse me Mr. Vella, but who are you to decide that WE do not need an opera house please?

Kevin Zammit

Apr 21st 2010, 10:05

Joe .... you deserve the pulitzer for this ... perfect ... absolutely perfect. With just 2 words you have described precisely Piano's project. Piano must be dead broke to go for this sham ...

Charles Bartolo

Apr 21st 2010, 14:08

http://www.caravaggio.com/projects/oh/operahouse.php

Advert
Advert