Deemed too young to be pierced
Body piercing artists are constantly approached by minors wanting to get some form of body jewellery.
Body piercing studios are regularly approached by unaccompanied teenagers despite new guidelines saying that minors should have parental consent before going under the needle.
According to the guidelines, issued by the health authorities, body piercing of those still under-18 can only take place with the written consent of their parents or a guardian. The guidelines also prohibit outright nipple or genital piercings in minors.
"I receive requests for piercings by minors under 18 practically every day but I tell them to go home and come back with their parents," the owner of a body art studio in St Julians said.
Bobby Wood, owner of a studio in Buġibba, agreed: "They come all the time. Most are still in school, mainly between the ages of 14 and 17 but I tell them I need their parents' consent... Sometimes they actually get a friend to phone and pretend it's their parents... but I don't fall for these tricks," he said.
The Children Commissioner's annual report, launched last week, recommended the legal regulation of body piercing.
Commissioner Carmen Zammit explained she was often approached by concerned parents whose children were pierced without their consent. The parents were primarily worried about the health repercussions of the piercings.
In her report, Ms Zammit pointed out that the Control of Tattooing Act banned the tattooing of minors under 18 and made such practice illegal. She suggested a similar law be enacted to regulate piercing in order to ensure it would be illegal to pierce a minor without adult consent.
Ms Zammit said that although a law regulating body piercing existed "this makes no specific reference to body piercing of minors".
The law lays down that a licence by the health authorities is required to perform body piercing. Operators must be knowledgeable about possible medical repercussions of piercing and discuss their client's medical history before going ahead with the procedure.
A separate licence, renewable annually, is required to operate the premises where the piercing takes place.
Health Director General Ray Busuttil explained that, last November, the authority issued guidelines for operators. "The standards being requested as reflected in the guidelines are high because we want to ensure the maximum safety in terms of possible transmission of blood-borne infections," Dr Busuttil said.
He explained that, while the guidelines were not law, they laid down the grounds on which the body-piercing licences were granted by the health authorities. This meant that an operator who performed piercings on minors, without parental consent, would not be granted a licence.
4 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Tania van Avendonk
Apr 25th 2010, 10:30
About time that the law is amended. We have a law to protect the image of our children but not their body. As parents we have to give consent for pictures to be taken of our children because of the Data Protection Law but we have no right to protect their bodies. Many persons or "artists" do not send minors away, they simply grab their money and do not explain any implications or risks. I am talking through personal and professional experience. Please do not leave any holes in the law for persons to exploit our children!
Robert Scullion
Apr 14th 2010, 15:36
Under 14 = illegal
14 - 17 = parents consent required
18 + = individuals right to choose
ANTHONY BORG
Apr 14th 2010, 15:16
The Law should be illegal under 18 years with or without the parents consent.
E Compagno
Apr 15th 2010, 09:09
That would mean no parent can take their children to have their ears pierced at all ... until they are 18.
Isn't that a bit far fetched?