Change of use applications worry Sliema residents
Seven applications by shop owners to turn their outlets on the Tigné peninsula into bars, cafés or restaurants are worrying two Sliema residents associations.
The Sliema Residents' Association and the Qui-Si-Sana and Tigné Residents Association said the North Harbour Local Plan specifically excluded Class 6 premises (cafés, bars and restaurants) from residential areas and incorporated a map precisely defining Sliema's residential areas.
"This type of development is obnoxious as it invariably leads to noise from the establishment itself... unbecoming behaviour and parking violations," the associations said.
Three of the seven applications involved outlets in the new Midi development and fell outside the map delineating residential areas in Sliema. However, the associations added, these would still attract additional traffic and "other objectionable activities" to surrounding streets.
The other four applications filed with the Malta Environment and Planning Authority were located within the defined residential area and "common sense dictated these should be refused outright".
The associations referred to the Prime Minister's statement last June that Mepa should not allow exploitation of any loopholes that violated the spirit of planning policies. Granting Class 6 permits in residential areas did precisely that, the two associations argued.
They appealed to the authorities to heed the Prime Minister's statement and apply the law in the way it was intended to without any twists or turns.
2 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Joseph V. Grech
Apr 10th 2010, 16:54
The facts are as stated: ''the North Harbour Local Plan specifically excludes bars / restaurants from residential areas''.
Therefore the four applications within the defined residential area NEED TO BE REFUSED outright - no other way out for Mepa! If it permits them it is breaking not only its own regulations but the law.
It is an obscenity that one permit has already been granted and the MEPA Board B should not have arbitrarily invented ''a Paceville-specific policy to be applied to Sliema to justify the decision.'' The Board B members should be prosecuted in court!
The Sliema residents are well advised not to rely just on the Planning Appeals Board to safeguard their interests. Objectors to permits know from experience that the legal representative of Mepa who attends the Board meetings will do practically anything to ensure that Mepa does not lose its case! So get an able legal consultant plus an architect and file your case in court.
Also, if you can, sue the members of the Board referred to earlier.
The Hon. P.M., the Parliamentary Secretary for Tourism, the Minister for Home Affairs and others should intervene. These sacrileges NEED TO STOP.
Raymond Camilleri
Apr 10th 2010, 13:21
Serves the majority of the Sliema residents right - vote George Pullicino and GOnzi and get lumped with THEIR policies.... tough luck!