Update 2: Lou Bondi' says BA decision 'completely unfair'
The Broadcasting Authority has fined PBS €1,164 after finding that the March 8 edition of Bondiplus broke political impartiality rules.
The decision was slammed by programme presenter Lou Bondi', who said it was 'completely unfair'.
The Authority said it had acted upon a charge made by its own CEO.
It said the programme was about the government's activity in the two years of this legislature. The only guest was deputy Prime Minister Tonio Borg.
A substantial part of the programme consisted of features on projects, programmes and initiatives launched by the government.
"In the opinion of the authority, these features were nothing other than promotion of government activity, with no effort having been made at critical analysis" the BA said.
During the interview with Dr Borg, the presenter raised some points of criticism, the authority said, but this was only a feeble attempt to establish some sort of balance and did not balance out the features and the lack of participation by people of different views.
In a reaction, Mr Bondi' said this decision was 'completely unfair'.
"38 per cent of the programme was about the problems of the PN backbench. During the programme I asked a total of 26 hard hitting questions to Minister Tonio Borg and the features on what the government accomplished during the first two years of office were purely and totally factual. It is also worth pointing out that the Labour Party itself did not complain about his programme to the Broadcasting Authority," Mr Bondi' said.
This, he said 'would not stop here.'
PBS TO GO TO COURT
A spokesman for PBS said the state broadcaster would be seeking a judicial review of the BA decision and was considering taking the case to the Constitutional Court.
Popular Stories
Update 3: Woman found dead in car,...
Updated: Woman dies in car crash
Carm Mifsud Bonnici resigns after...
Part of Dwejra 'Azure window' collapses
The end of the bar that ‘never closed’
Bundy does not know whether to...
Updated - Jason Micallef demands...
This WAS the night - Kurt makes it...
Petrol price up 6c
In Discussion
Updated - Jason Micallef demands...
Gozo tunnel could take 5-7 years to...
CABS remote controlled aircraft shot...
Carm Mifsud Bonnici resigns after...
Joseph Calleja condemns portrayal of...
Updated: Labour would give...
CABS drone shot down
Second group of migrants arrives
Adrian Vassallo in scathing...
79 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Joe Fenech
Apr 8th 2010, 23:35
NO ONE who calls himself a journalist would talk or reason like you!
WHO would call people "a tosser" (other word for w..ker)????
( see below: "If you are not able to, look in the mirror and admit that you are a tosser")
It is also scary how sure you are about "laughing last". Seems that you already know the outcome delivered by our exceptional courts!
Hallini Bondin hi!
Joe Busuttil
Apr 8th 2010, 21:04
Please Lou,can you do a repeat as I missed all the fun last Monday (your program goes on the air on Monday I suppose)? I don't see your program for many reasons but mainly I can't stand people in braces. Are they supposed to be macho?
Mario Bonnici
Apr 8th 2010, 20:27
Something tells me that Pierre Cassar is next in line to be 'attacked' by the PN.
I saw the programme in question. In my opinion it was a one hour and a half promo for the government. But that is my opinion.
C.camilleri
Apr 8th 2010, 19:28
Every time some institution dare point a finger against the PN and its allies all hell break loose in Malta.
They attacked the Mepa auditor
The jury system
Caritas
and the list goes on. Now the BA is under fire.
Democracy in Malta at its best. The PN simple believes that they are untouchables.
G. Mangion
Apr 8th 2010, 17:35
Keep the Good Work Up Bondi Plus welldone the best Programm Ever !!
TINSEWX LI TAJJEB JIRBAH ZGUR, f' dan il kaz Bondi Plus...........
Adrian Borg Cardona
Apr 8th 2010, 12:03
In response to your challenge, Mr. Bondi, I now challenge you to tell us in which one of your programmes featuring Nationalist politicians, you reaction to an answer from them was "Veru?", or "Cert?" implying that you the reply was not correct or that the answer was not complete. These were some your responses to answers given you by Joseph Muscat where you led people to believe that Muscat was hiding something, Have you done the same to Lawrence Gonzi? I would say not. Because this is exactly where your bias shows up - in the type of questions you ask and your response to the reply. I am no fan of JM but pleae do not treat us like fools.
J.Camilleri
Apr 8th 2010, 11:10
Is it Bondi plus or Gonzi plus ?
J.Cauchi
Apr 8th 2010, 10:58
Always 80's 80's 80's kemm sawwtuna...kemm haqqruna.... change the tune and get a life while you're at it....you all sound like boring broken record!!
C. Azzopardi
Apr 8th 2010, 10:28
Even Emilio Fede and Michele Santoro are good journalists. But good journalism doesnt necessarily mean unbiased and free of political agendas. Where are the programmes on corruption, Enemalta, MEPA and a million other possible stories which shamefully are never covered or only covered lightly in his programmes? Bondi chooses to remain hush hush on various matters, just like Emilio Fede chooses to ignore or belittle the severity of the scandals of his fellow friend Berlusconi. The only minor insignificant difference is that Fede works for Berlusconi whilst Bondi's show is aired on national TV which is financed by everyone's taxes. Can you imagine Emilio Fede hosting a political show on RAI? This would be considered as the scandal of the century in Italy. Bondi running political programmes on TVM has been the norm in the past 20 years of Maltese TV. Sad but true!
Joe Fenech
Apr 8th 2010, 17:45
The problem with Italy is the Berlusconi has hijacked the media. He should not possess any TV stations while a president.
Yes, unfortunately TVM is the government's station. Even under Mintoff we were able to watch impartial programmes like Malta U Lil Hinn Minna...
Today Malta lives a sad reality of censorship and subtle dictatorship . it is also an a ecclesiastical state. Shame on Gonzi and regime!
S.Cutajar
Apr 8th 2010, 09:09
@ N.Farrugia - When is the mentality in this country going to change? Even if under the labour regime bias in the broadcasting authority was at its best, why should it serve to justify bias nowadays? Why do we continue to bring forward the past in order to justify the present inefficiencies in this country? Don't we all believe that we are in a new era - where people are endowed with open critical minds unlike past blind political affiliations?? Or do we use such claims only when convenient??
I happen to be a great fan of Bondi plus and find it to be a very professional current affairs programme. In fact I doubt whether the accusations being charged are justified. In my opinion Lou Bondi was much more biased in the past. Recently I saw a great ammelioration in the quality of the programme with the presenter being much more concerned with good-quality journalism rather than hidden political agendas.
B Galea
Apr 8th 2010, 08:48
Insejtuh zmienkhom Sur Jimmy Magro? Meta ghanqas isem il-Prim Ministru ma' seta` jissemha fuq ix-xandir! Il-hnizrijiet li rajna f'dawk iz-zmenijiet zgura ma ghandhomx paragun mad-demokkrazija li qed igawdi kullhadd illum. Huwa propju ghax hawn liberta` vera, li xi hadd bhalek u dawk li qed jikkritikaw kulljum fuq dan il-gurnal ghal kull nemusa li tghaddi minn quddiemhom. Mur giebkhom 25 sena ilu tisimghu kummenti li jinkietbu hawn.....holl xaghrek u gieb iz-zejt ehh. Kont taqla xebgha ghax tesprimi ruhek u l-oppinjoni tieghek mil-watchdogs tal-partit li thaddan int l-ewwel wiehed siehbi! Ara llum kulhadd jghid li jridd u jfettillu.........kwazi z-zejjed, specjalment minn uhud tan-naha taghkhom. Ara tahsbu li certi hwejjeg intnessew ta. Min ghadda minnhom ghadu jhoss dawn il-wegghat f'qalbu. Tal-misthija kif konna ttratti minn hutna Maltin stess, l-ghanqas meta konna taht il-barrani ma hadna trattament bhal dawk iz-zmenijiet tal-misthija.
K.Abela
Apr 8th 2010, 07:03
Completley agree with J.Magro. What counts is the peoples perception out here. That is what is relevant, irrispective of how many excuses mr.Bondi can come up with. For too long these people were allowed to do all they wanted and how they wanted, thinkng that people outside are stupid . And for all PN apologists, You are so fast to remind us the wrongs that were done 30years or so ago (and rightly so) but are not capable(or honest enough) to admit of the wrongs that are being inflicted on us today. Shame
David Cutajar
Apr 8th 2010, 00:18
Oh but Lou Bondi, don't you see? Even attacking the backbench can be done in service to the government. Daphne Caruana Galizia attacks the backbench (just like you!) to try to scare them into submission, so that they'll stop hassling Dr Gonzi. Lou Bondi is a naughty naughty boy!
Lou Bondi
Apr 7th 2010, 23:38
Here's a challenge for the doubters below: identify one thing I said in the studio or which Rachel said in the features which is not true. If you are not able to, look in the mirror and admit that you are a tosser. The law is about facts not prejuduces and that is why I am looking forward with serenity and enthusiam to taking the Broadcasting Authority to court. I repeat, let us see who will laugh last.
B Galea
Apr 8th 2010, 11:24
Bias and untruth are two different beasts, Mr Bondi. Arguing "nothing I said was untrue, and therefore I wasn't biased" is a straw man argument.
We might be tossers, but to your evident dismay, we ain't no fools.
Jessica Borg
Apr 9th 2010, 11:57
When you speak to PN people you are clearly calmer and more polite than when you speak to MLP guys. Even my 5 year old son noticed that. You should be a politician not an supposedly 'impartial' tv presenter. Leave the task to Rachel at least.
Charles Massa
Apr 7th 2010, 20:01
About time. Xandir Mlata is only a PN spokes man. Finally MBA woke up
Charles J. Buttigieg
Apr 7th 2010, 17:51
@ N.Farrugia
Nobody can deny that Pellegrini will always be remembered for turning Xandir Malta into a Kazin Laburista but the change in government in 1987 saw to it to change that situation and ipso factum they transformed it to a Kazin Nazzjonalista. The other change was the professional approach; Pellegrini lacked finesse and flamboyantly flagellated the PN while his political boss encouraged him to use the air time to turn Malta into a Socialist Country. The new approach of 1987 became professional, subtle and a real effective tool to reach its political agenda.
Jimmy Magro
Apr 7th 2010, 17:41
@Lou Bondi
The fact that the PL did not complain about the said programme is not evidence in your defence. As far as I can understand the PL stopped compalining about programmes on PBS since 2004 when a new Administration came into place.
I think you will come to same conclusion: it is the perception of the people that counts. How did the people judge the programme?
As you know today there are media meters that can show the reacton of the audience live on TV. Maybe you can invest into this technology from some of the profits that WE make every year.
After all we have come to like everything to be state of the art: like our
1. mater dei building but not service
2. fresh Papal roads :)
3. enemalta
4. services at MIA
etc
Then you will have a people's judgement and you will not have to depend on the certificate of the PL.
c. camilleri
Apr 7th 2010, 16:23
Oh how things have changed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! From a national station which once wanted to make a socialist Malta and banning the name of the leader of the opposition to one being fined for just mentioning Govt Projects.
C.Azzopardi
Apr 7th 2010, 16:21
Mr. Bondi, I am a regular follower of your programme and sincerely find it to be technically very good, so consider me, in some way, a fan of yours. I am of the opinion that politicians need to be cornered and asked difficult questions and you normally do this very well but don't you agree that you are normally more agressive and investigative with PL matters and a tad too soft when it comes to PN problems and stuff? I still remember your last two programmes before the last election - a one to one interview with A.Sant and one with Gonzi in the following week. The A.Sant interview was, rightly so, very agressive whilst the Gonzi one, in comparison, felt like a lovely tea party between the two of you. Dont you agree?
N.Farrugia
Apr 7th 2010, 16:16
Reading some of the writings hereunder makes me shiver! Whilst some of the bloggers are accusing Lou Bondi of being biased, they are simply forgetting the days when we were under the Labour regime. If Lou is biased ,what were people who used to control every inch of our broadcasting stations? What was the newsroom like during that time? One TV today is saintly compared to Dardir Malta of yesteryears. Not one single Nationalist inclined braodcaster was employed. All contributors not wearing 'it-torca' on their jackets, we not even allowed to enter the place. When today the opposition is given a fair share of interviews and news coverage, in those years the nationalist views and protagonists were not even mentioned. Ask the late Toni Pellegrini and Manwel Haber. Unfortunately they cannot respond to the scandalous way they controlled the station. It was simply a Kazin Laburista!
Lawrence Fenech
Apr 7th 2010, 16:14
@C. Azzopardi.
Prosit, you hit the nail right on its head.
Lawrence Fenech
Apr 7th 2010, 16:12
It has now become obvious how guests from the 2 major parties are treated differently by our local 3 so called journalists.
It is about time that some sort of balance and comments are brought to a decent level in order that viewers may be able to stick to the programs rather than change channel after 5 or 10 mminutes due to the biased political opinion of the presenter.
Victor Laiviera
Apr 7th 2010, 15:34
How amusing - I have just realised exactly what Lou Bondi said. According to him, anything uttered by the Prime Minister is a "fact".
Would he say the same about anything uttered by an opposition MP? Hardly.
Those whom the gods want to destroy ....
Ron Saliba
Apr 7th 2010, 16:19
Read Again, he said Quote 'a fact uttered by a politician '. Stop playing the 'PN" game.
Victor Laiviera
Apr 7th 2010, 15:13
Mr Bondi either thinks that the readers of The Times are stupid and unable to see a totally biased program when they see one or else he is so far gone in his pro-PN bias the he does not even realise himself how slanted his programs are.
Since I have a healthy respect for his intelligence, I think the first option is probably true.
But he is mistaken. You can only fool the people for so long.
Muscat Pat
Apr 7th 2010, 15:05
L.Bondi is right, so much so that he should be eligible for the Chairmanship of the Broadcasting Authority. Carry on Lou!
Antonio Muscat
Apr 7th 2010, 15:02
Interessanti kif dan Lou Bondi dejjem ghandu ragun u meta xi (hadd) l-Awtorita' tax-Xandir issibu hati u wkoll irid jilmenta!
L-istess dwar il-kwistjoni ta' Universita' ohra - "Ghax qed nghidlek li m'hemmx bzonn ta' universita' ohra" qalilna lou bondi, fuq Bondi+ - Izda skuzi, tista' tghidilna minn fejn hrigt biha din l-istqarrija? Ghamilt xi studju biex tistabbilixxi jekk hux veru jew le li ghandna bzonn universita' ohra?
Charles J. Buttigieg
Apr 7th 2010, 14:03
Lou Bondi is one of our best journalists,probably the best. I like his style and I consider him a real professional in spite of his obvious PN bias. I think of Lou as an opportunist in a positive way, he is a top-notch propagandist, they gave him a golden opportunity to propagate his political belief and he grabbed it. If I were in his shoes I would do exactly the same except of course that my bias will be pro Labour. I say prosit Lou.
If we want to be true to ourselves we mustn’t point a finger to accuse this Guru ,our finger should be pointed at PBS for choosing a hard linepolitical animal to air current affairs programme. Immagine PL in government employing Manuel Cuschieri to produce and present a similar weekly show on PBS. Good luck to the PN for getting away with murder. U mela Lou Bondi, mela dak ma jridx jiekol?
Lou Bondi
Apr 7th 2010, 13:39
These are the facts (more to come in court):
1. The Partit Laburista did not register a complaint against this edition Bondiplus.
2. The Broadcasting Authority ignored 38% of the programme which was about the PN’s backbench problems. In this section I asked Minister Borg 13 questions on the PN's problems.
3. The Broadcasting Authority is implicitly discriminating against Bondiplus, even within the context of similar programmes aired on PBS.
4. The Broadcasting Authority is inventing out of thin air a new rule on defining what a fact is. According to this new rule, a fact uttered by a politician, in this case the Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi, is no longer a fact but becomes an opinion which then needs to be “balanced” by some other utterance from the opposing party.
It is going to be a pleasure for me to take the Broadcasting Authority to court. We will see will laugh last.
lgalea
Apr 7th 2010, 17:03
Is it a fact because it is uttered by the PM?
The same as the guarantee he gave to the Dockyard workers prior to the last election?
The same as cousin Agostino Pio Lou?
J Tabone
Apr 7th 2010, 19:14
1. Irrelevant
2. 100% of Rachel's features were pure government propoganda, worse than a NET TV feature. I thought I was living in heaven for a moment. That is the problem LOU! You were only attacking the backbenchers but never at any point in time
3. Other programmes aired on PBS (Dissett ?) are balanced and well researched. I enjoy watching both Muscat and Gonzi hammered in these programs (as a good journalist should do).
Remember that you are being aired on the National Station, not NET TV!
"We will see will laugh last." Typical Bondi's arrogance and bullying at its best.
B Galea
Apr 8th 2010, 10:23
Please Mr Bondi,
Spare us the trouble and yourself the blushes. I felt embarrassed for you when I saw the edition in question. Sycophantic doesn't even begin to describe your 'performance'.
You used to be a half-decent journalist, once upon a time. But perhaps you've tired - certainly not mellowed - with age, and can't be bothered to even put up a veil of impartiality any more.
Either way, you've lost just about all the credibility you once had as a serious journalist. PL fanatics have always called you a party hack, but floating voters such as myself used to consider you an informed, erudite source. Used to.
J Martinelli
Apr 7th 2010, 13:01
@ Peter Korsten
Since you don't understand Maltese, your comments are totally useless. You rely on incomprehensible (to you) audio and body language which is normally synchronized to what is being said and which you, admittedly, do not understand.
You have to know that when a government Minister is questioned by Lou Bondi, his/her response is usually readily given, even if in politics, tinting one's answer is expected.
In contrast, when questions are asked to Opposition Labour, the answers, if given at all, are quite evasive, incomplete and aimed solely to justifying Labour's positions, which, time and time again were proven wrong.
I can assure you that most of the public shares Bondi's frustration at trying to get straight answers, let alone a semblance of a good policy plan from any representative of the Labour Party. You should also note that the way Labour declares 'victory' is when their man interrupts and out-shouts every opposing member of a panel.
The BA's decision to fine Bondiplus reeks to high heaven since Minister Tonio Borg recounted the government's achievements in the recent past and there was no direct reference to the Opposition's attitude which needed 'balance'.
r.camilleri
Apr 8th 2010, 13:23
@j.martinelli:
quote:"you have to know that when a government minister is questioned by lou bondi, his/her response is usually ready given, even if in politics, tinting one's answer is expected".
could it be that government ministers know the questions coming?
Peter Korsten
Apr 9th 2010, 09:02
@J. Martinelli: rubbish. Communication is only 7% or 8% the words being spoken; the rest is the intonation and the body language. So I'm actually missing very little of the gist of the whole thing.
Whether the answer is evasive or not is useless. First off, I'm yet to see the first politician in any country and any political colour to give the answer you like. Given Lou Bondi's well-known allegiance, it is not unreasonable to presume that either the questions with PN members have been rehearsed before, or that they're not nearly as 'hard-hitting' as he claims they are.
G Pulis
Apr 7th 2010, 12:47
Everyone seems to forget that we all have our own minds and can therefore form our own judgments and opinions. No BA, PL, PN, or any presenter can ever tell me what to think.
However one needs to have access to information. In this case I think BA s action doesnt make sense as it blocks my right to know. This especially stands since both Net and One present politically biased one sided versions, which makes them highly unreliable and an offence to our intelligence.
On the otherhand I enjoyed the programme in question and also the one where Dr Muscat got interviewed.
I am curious to see if action will be taken against this programme which featured Dr Muscat....even though I dont agree that such action should be taken.
Peter Korsten
Apr 7th 2010, 12:37
It's funny that you can get fined for having a strong political opinion in this country. The government may have uncovered a way to get rid of the national debt. :)
Seriously, though, even though I don't understand Maltese, it's very easy to tell what political affiliation the person being interviewed by Lou Bondi has. To me, he resembles a terrier whenever there's a Labour party member in the other chair: highly agitated and barking questions. More a Jack Russell than an Airedale, though.
Victor Laiviera
Apr 7th 2010, 13:09
Not exactly, Mr Korsten. Lou Bondi is not being fined for having "strong political opinions". The fine is for broadcasting highly biased and partisan programms on the national station, which is supposed to provide the people with impartial and factual information.
Peter Korsten
Apr 9th 2010, 09:12
Why yes, I understand that: that's why there is a smiley at the end of the first sentence.
Karl Abela
Apr 7th 2010, 12:11
Lou Bondi is the best political presenter on the island who has got a challenging but balanced style. Privately, he is politically biased as every individual has the right to do and naturally many people who dont share the same line of thought will hit at him hard and unfairly because they know that he is good at what he does.
On the other hand when Reno Bugeja interviewed Joseph Muscat on Dissett it was like they were having a chat about their favourite football team over a cup of tea.
Joe Cassar
Apr 7th 2010, 13:11
"a challenging but balanced style."?? You are joking, right?
C.Azzopardi
Apr 7th 2010, 11:56
It is a known fact, and not an opinion, that PBS and Where's Everybody are PN's biggest PR tools. This is why the PN don't attempt to improve their mediocre TV station. Why bother investing in Net TV when you have the two biggest TV programmes (Bondi+ and Xarabank) conducted by people with strong, if not colossal, PN inclination. There wouldn’t be anything wrong with Bondi and Peppi being super PN supporters if it weren’t for the simple fact that their programmes who are financed by everybody’s taxes are impressively impartial, especially during election times. Bondi+ is an excellent programme from a technical standpoint but given the conductor’s affiliations and political beliefs it is definitely not national TV material.
Mario Farrugia
Apr 7th 2010, 11:47
Mr. Bondi is right... the decision is totally unfair... in fact, it is HE HIMSELF who should pay the fine, not we taxpayers!!!
Hallina Sur Bondi!
J. Tabone
Apr 7th 2010, 11:45
Lou Bondi can NEVER be impartial. Can Jason Micallef ever be impartial ? You get my point ?
Brian Farrugia
Apr 7th 2010, 11:41
The decision is fully justified, Bondi has needed some sort of gagging for a while. A totally bias presenter and arrogant with it.
ALBERT FENECH
Apr 7th 2010, 11:36
Wonders will never cease. Is this an implication that Mr Lou Bondi is showing bias towards the Government and in turn the PN? I find that rather incredible. I always thought that as an interviewer and a person aspiring to present himself to the general public as an "investigative" journalist, he was always neutral! I hope this is not some kind of belated April Fool joke.....
C. Azzopardi
Apr 7th 2010, 12:09
I suggest you watch his last programmes before the next general election to see how "neutral", "investigative" and might I add "creative" he can get. Where's his programme on Enemalta's latest blunders???
T Camilleri
Apr 7th 2010, 17:11
C. Azzopardi or on the water and electricity tariffs, the Fairmount saga, the €4 MILLION COMMISSION, why the law was changed to allow BWSC to win the tender with the most polluting plant, all MEPA's controversial decisions and a lot of others that he and the other prominent presenter do not want to touch with a barge pole.
victor vella
Apr 7th 2010, 11:34
@ Victor Laivira#Listess nies li halsu id danni lill dak il gwardjan tal habs ghal hnizrijiet li saru fuqu, l istess nies li halsu id danni lill siehbek il paerit Mintoff ghal post mibni minnghajr permess f Dellimara, l istess nies li halsu ghal hnizrijiet u serq li saru mill public works,
Claire Bonello
Apr 7th 2010, 11:33
We must have all missed the hard-hitting questions. Tonio Borg looked like he was getting a feather-massage.
Peter Abela
Apr 7th 2010, 11:18
li kien hemm Joseph Muscat ma Tonio Borg dakinhar kien jaghmel gimgha jitkellem dwar il-missmanagement li hawn fil-pajjiz!!
C.Borg
Apr 7th 2010, 11:59
jien nahseb kien jaghmel aktar min gimgha! u kien jkollu ragun!!!! xi hadd jrid jitkellem fuq dil medjokrita ta pajjiz! xbajna naraw kollox ghaddej!
Karl Abela
Apr 7th 2010, 11:14
The labour party did not complain about the program but it would appear that strings were defintely pulled silenty.
G Bugeja
Apr 7th 2010, 11:03
Ijja Joseph Muscat had EXACTLY the same treatment as Tonio Borg.
BiasedPLUS.
All features were positive on government and questions were all on why the government is not promoting itself well. (So he did it for them).
38% on backbench. Hohohohoho don't make me laugh. If I remember correctly there was an instance when Tonio Borg said the 'apprentices' will not be paid. And Lou did not even challenge him on this.
Whilst he was a journalist (and a tough one for Joseph Muscat) he was a propagandist when it came to Tonio Borg.
Finally BA has taken a stand. Well done.
A.Rapa
Apr 7th 2010, 11:49
It's not anyones fault that L.Bondi is more than a pro gov than a pro PL. He is a bright and intelligent popular journalist/personality and no one can neglect that. Probably, Joe Muscat himself would have been a good competitor should he have not chosen to go from journalism to politics.
C. Sapiano
Apr 7th 2010, 11:00
@c camilleri
Did Xandir Malta ever get fines when they did not mention Dr.Fenech Adami by name? Now there is democracy.
Joseph Cauchi
Apr 7th 2010, 10:57
.
Is PBS going to lodge an appeal?
JC.
joanna farrugia
Apr 7th 2010, 10:51
@ r spiteri iva hu permess li jm kien wahdu ghax il pbs hu stazzjon nazzjonali u mhux tal pn biss ghalkemm dejjem kien forcina mal pn.
Victor Laiviera
Apr 7th 2010, 10:51
@ R Spiteri
It is not who is present that counts, but how the presenter (Bondi) treats them.
LP representatives are quizzed and harassed while their PN equivalents are treated with kid gloves and not asked any embarassing questions whatsoever.
J Galea
Apr 7th 2010, 10:47
Now this is Mickey Mouse....
This, in my opinion is non-sense. The discussion was about the government's activity in the past two years which was similar to the programme about the first year of Joseph Muscat's leadership of the MLP. I understand that none of these programmes was meant to be some kind of debate, so where was the impartiality?
J. Mamo
Apr 7th 2010, 10:46
Will PBS will be fined again from our taxes because Joseph Muscat was there last week alone promoting his ideas. Ara veru xej sew dal- pajjiz
J Farrugia
Apr 7th 2010, 10:43
mela l-awtorita' tax-xandir fejn kienet meta dardir malta qazzez lil kulhadd? U kemm kienet timmultah lil Dardir Malta fi zmien il-lejber, meta hlief hnizrijiet ma rajniex uma smajniex, u dak iz-zmien ma kienx hawn stazzjonijiet iktar tat-televisions u sa meta anke rajna Brigadier bil-mustacci jwerwer il-haddiema tal-Korp tal-Pijunieri b'dixxiplina militari fuq l-istess TV. Veru l-awtoritajiet lokali huma kollha korrotti.
Charles Micallef
Apr 7th 2010, 10:36
Finally jusitice for the common man (viewer) who is fed up with partisan politics.....
...a very welcome change indeed !
R Spiteri
Apr 7th 2010, 10:27
li kien hemm joseph muscat wahdu gimgha ilu, huwa permess?!!
stephen c sammut
Apr 7th 2010, 11:26
Jekk tara il-programmi ta bondi suppost ilek li indunajt il-fejn ixaqleb, jekk stieden darba lill JM wahdu il-gimgha l-ohra kien hemm drabi ohra fejn stieden lill-prim ministru wahdu, ftit tal gimghat ilu kien hemm Fr Joe Borg wahdu fuq il- programm, fejn ma seta imerieh hadd, kullhadd jaf ma liema naha ixaqleb dan il qassis. Infakkrek li din il-propoganda favur il-gvern qed issir fuq stazzjon ta l-istat imhallas minn but kulhadd u mhux minn nazzjonalisti u go pajjiz li suppost niftahru kemm ahna demokratici.
A.Rapa
Apr 7th 2010, 11:44
Insejtu iz zmien meta konna naraw l-emblema tal labor party u it torca fuq it TVM ? things have changed and a lot since that time of Mintoff's reign and dictatorial ideas.
Victor Laiviera
Apr 7th 2010, 10:26
Who will pay this fine? PBS (which means us, the taxpayers) or "Where's Everybody" who committed the offense?
Antoine Vella
Apr 7th 2010, 11:14
Since this decision is of service to the PL, it is fitting that the money should be forked out by the PL.
E.Borg
Apr 7th 2010, 11:48
Dear Antoine,
Your argument, sir, makes no sense.
Joe Fenech
Apr 8th 2010, 17:50
Dear Antoine - I confirm that your comment makes no sense and it comes out of someone's who sees everything through a blue filter.
What about non PL/PN people? Aren't does entitled to impartiality.
c camilleri
Apr 7th 2010, 10:26
Funny! I was under the impression that PBS and Bondiplus are constantly pro PL and not vice versa!
mario gellel
Apr 7th 2010, 10:26
Ironicly, it is not PBS (from our taxes) who should pay but BONDIPLUS himself. After all it is his and only his program. Even a mule can say which political party he adores.
M.Brincat
Apr 7th 2010, 10:15
Some things never change.
Dennis Debono
Apr 7th 2010, 10:26
.....well actually they are -- if PBS and Bondiplus are a government promotion machine; and the BA is a government shield then BA would not have fined Bondiplus!
Another note is...why was Bondiplus not fined when they decided to extend the time of the program when Tony Zarb decided to enter the program in its closing stages?
I'm starting to think that BA is a PL machine...
M. Spiteri
Apr 7th 2010, 10:29
Dennis Debono please don't be that blunt
Antoine Vella
Apr 7th 2010, 15:19
M.Spiteri
"Dennis Debono please don't be that blunt"
What do you mean, 'blunt'? Actually I think Dennis Debono is quite sharp in his perception.