Advert

Front Against Censorship asks MEPs to take Malta's case to the EP

The assistance of Malta’s MEPs for the removal of censorship is being sought by the Front Against Censorship which in a letter to the country’s representatives in the EU said it was very worrying that the Maltese were still not enjoying some of the most fundamental European freedoms.

The Front said that 2009 would be remembered as the year when the supposedly modern and European Maltese State escalated its actions against freedom of speech through draconian actions such as the punishment of carnival revellers for dressing up as Christ, the ban of the play Stitching, the threat of a prison sentence to a newspaper editor for publishing an erotic story and the suspended prison sentence to an artist for a visual which criticised the Catholic religion.

The Front was set up in reaction to these events and now had more than 3,800 members.

The Front said censorship on arts and entertainment went against the core European principles of liberty and freedom of expression.

“This, however, does not mean that we believe in a lawless state. On the contrary, we wholeheartedly believe that laws should be there to protect citizens, and not to be used as a force that restricts criticism and/or punishes innovative artists.

“We are humbly urging you to present this case of affairs to the European Parliament in order to raise the alarm on a European level regarding Malta's repressive and outdated censorship laws.

The Front said it was not in favour of any form of discrimination, exploitation or hate speech as defined by law and neither did it believe that the removal of censorship would allow such acts to increase unregulated.

It believed that punishing artists for being critical of the Catholic Church or banning plays for what moralists may perceive to be 'bad taste' were totally unacceptable in a European country in 2010.

Advert

13 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

M Agius

Mar 30th 2010, 20:26

But that 'rubbish' was going to be read by adults, or university students don't classify as adults? Do they need parenting?

D Phillips

Mar 30th 2010, 22:40

No need for it to be censored. As an adult, you are free to choose to read what you want to read and not to read what you don't want. Simple.

David Caruana

Mar 31st 2010, 09:18

Tista' jekk jogħoġbok iġġibilna eżempju? Din li titfgħu t-tajn mingħajr ma tkunu speċifiċi hija viljakkata grassa. Mela jekk int daqshekk ċert ta' dak li qed tgħid, nitolbok tkun raġel biżżejjed u tatina l-ismijiet ta' min iċċensura, min ġie iċċensurat u l-okkażjoni fejn twettqet ċensura nġusta.

Robert Agius

Mar 30th 2010, 18:52

No Joe, lack of responsibility and lack of tolerance are bringing about the fall European civilization.

I mean is it only who feels that the whole Muslims Vs Christians just shows a lack of tolerance by the...erm...lack of tolerant (that includes many, fortunately not all, Christians and Muslims).

'Do you want divorce?' What do you mean by that? - Who are you to judge people (tolerance) who do want a divorce and have sensible reasons for doing so (this is the responsibility part)
'Do you approve of grown ups abusing of minors?' - Now that is just plain stupid. Not to be able to read a text such as the recent one which created such controversy, i repeat reading, without being able to restrict oneself to actually acting it out is IRRESPONSIBLE. I can carry on forever but will stop here...

Is that such a hard thing to agree with Joe? Responsibility for your actions, and being tolerant. They see simple enough to grasp, and to see the beauty of what people have gained through reason, and bloodshed, - Freedom

God rid us of conservatives...ooops, perhaps they are not :P




wally vella-zarb

Mar 30th 2010, 19:25

"Do wish to have a play like Hair running for months on end just to be able to see some nudity? "

Evidently, sir, you have never been to the theatre to experience Hair. Only a boor would say that it was about nudity. Only a boor would fail to appreciate that it epitomised the anti-war movement that was the hallmark of the sixties!

Advert
Advert