Advert

University election valid despite low turnout - KSU president

The re-elected president of the University Students' Council (KSU), Carl Grech, said today that the council was prepared to hold talks with students on the university electoral system.

The electoral system was one of the major controversies in the run-up to the election, held yesterday. The Christian Democrat Students were re-elected for the fourth time to form the council but only 1836 students voted out of a total student population of 13,000.

Mr Grech said that despite the low turnout, 'democracy had worked' and since there were no irregularities, the election was valid.

Stefan Balzan, SDM president said that the election result was clear proof that many students believed they should trust SDM.

PULSE REACTION

Student organisation Pulse said the elections turnout was less than 15% of those eligible, the lowest ever.

"This is a clear indication that the current first-past-the-post system is not being democratically effective enough and consequently it is limiting student participation and representation."

Pulse said it was surprised at SDM’s reaction on this year’s result, when 85% of the University student population did not bother to cast their vote under the current system.

"Pulse positively notes that it seems that now SDM, after the elections are over, seems to be willing to accept Pulse call to discuss the electoral reforms needed. In the coming period Pulse will further its campaign in favour of a Proportionally-Representative electoral system."

Advert

43 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Abigail Muscat

Mar 27th 2010, 13:26

I do not think it is about SDM and the anti-SDM. You are right in saying however that if students truly did not want SDM in KSU, they would have simply voted for the independent party. However, I would refrain from congratulating SDM since clearly both MI's and SDM's campaigns failed. (Granted of course to MI that they had less time to produce a serious campaign) It seems the only people who voted for SDM were the SDM die hards and thus SDM failed to reel in and persuade any new students. I for one am saddened by the fact that student life at UoM is so apathetic, arid and vacant. I consider this election a victory for nobody.

lara cardona

Apr 22nd 2010, 11:54

i agree with you daniel............ it is not sdm's fault that people did not give care about going to vote, anyone attending university and junior college could vote, , yes democracy was practiced, it was those people who did not vote who did not practice one of their democratic values, eventually the most fundamental one... that of voting. it's is not carl's fault or any one's fault that people did not vote... sdm won because it deserved to win .... because of the hard work it had carried throughout the times... congractulations sdm and keep it up!

Nicky Azzopardi

Mar 26th 2010, 17:36

They should not be ashamed for people who didn't bother voting. Moviment "Independenti" should be disappointed at their failure to attract anyone. SDM got more than double of their votes.

And people DO trust SDM, which is why they've been elected for the past 4 years.

Annette Camilleri

Mar 26th 2010, 16:50

Because Pulse decided not to contest following disputes during a KSU meeting...duh!

Christian Sciberras

Mar 27th 2010, 02:16

BZZZT Correction:
"Democracy proved how it can fail..."

Seriously, this is the worst outcome I would have imagined.
...I lied I couldn't imagine such a worse outcome.

And people have the guts to call it democracy? Where the heck did they learn about the term "democracy"?

By "majority" we mean "a considerable amount from total" not the "largest possible fraction".
In fact, if it were the later, the students that didn't vote would have won.....!!
Success indeed!

Advert
Advert