Advert

GWU says government ignored agreement for new dockyard operator to retain workers

Happier times - a busy scene at the dockyard.

Happier times - a busy scene at the dockyard.

The GWU has called on the government to urge new dockyard operator Palumbo to give preference in recruitment to workers who had stayed on at Malta Shipyards to the end.

Union General Secretary Tony Zarb told Finance Minister Tonio Fenech in a letter made public by the union that the GWU was disappointed that the government had not made it compulsory for Palumbo to retain the workers who were still on the dockyard's books.

He said that according to the agreement reached between the union and the government on September 5, 2008, the remaining dockyard workers were to be retained by the new operator.

Mr Fenech said earlier this week that Palumbo did not want to be obliged to retain the workers and it wanted to start with a clean slate, and new working conditions. He said the 60 remaining dockyard workers were being offered early retirement or employment with state-owned IPSL.

Mr Zarb said the GWU was also disappointed that the government had ignored former dockyard apprentices, who were now unemployed.

The government had also not laid down the minimum number of Maltese who would be employed by Palumbo. Nor had it insisted that current work and safety arrangements be retained. It seemed to be acceptable to the government that the workers would only have the minimum conditions laid down by law.

Mr Zarb regretted that the government had not been able to attract major operators to manage the shipyard. The government had also ignored suggestions for the setting up of a workers' cooperative, a suggestion made following advice by, among others, former minister John Dalli and former University Rector Peter Serracino Inglott.

Advert

16 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

lgalea

Mar 25th 2010, 09:07

Anthony Castillo Your pn government will be remembered as being the one who monkeyed Thatcher and speaks highly for its perpetual stance against the workers and the lower classes of society.

M Cassar

Mar 24th 2010, 18:54

J Farrugia so first you let a company go bankrupt without trying to be efficient and finding alternatives so that then you will have an excuse to sell it. Why don't they just sell the entire country. Ofcourse they wouldn't otherwise the people would realise what's going on, but sell it bit by bit.. Banks, sea malta, Airmalta maybe next? (I invite people to give us a list of every public entity sold by Pn in 20 years)..make some money for yourself, and then claim that it was making a loss. With this strategy the people will not realise that they have slowly sold everything that was ours. It's called inefficiency and deceit if you ask me. If a company is not sustainable then an alternative should be found immediately instead of giving subsidies for years so that later you can justify selling out.

Advert
Advert