City Gate project: The final judgment
The fate of Valletta's entrance will be sealed tomorrow when the planning board votes on the controversial City Gate project that has been recommended for approval.
According to Italian architect Renzo Piano's plans, the €80 million project will incorporate the redevelopment of City Gate and a new Parliament elevated on "stilts" in Freedom Square.
But the most controversial proposal has been the redevelopment of the Royal Opera House site into a space that would incorporate the bombed ruins hosting a 1,200-seat open-air theatre.
Widespread dissent was expressed by artistes and the public on the idea of a roofless performing space but the government said it would rely on the advice of Mr Piano and intended forging ahead with its plans.
The heated national debate over the future of the opera house had led to the shelving of Mr Piano's City Gate plans when they were first proposed over 20 years ago. The revised plans, to be decided upon tomorrow, were unveiled to the public last summer for consultation.
Environmental organisations have maintained that the project violates the Structure Plan in that ministries and Parliament, according to their interpretation, can only be sited in an auberge or palace in Valletta. This is one of the reasons why eight organisations protested in Valletta earlier this month.
According to the Malta Environment and Planning Authority website, the project has been recommended for approval by Mepa's case officer.
Preparation works for the Valletta project were expected to start on April 1 when Freedom Square would be closed for demolition works on the shops under the arcades, Lands Parliamentary Secretary Jason Azzopardi had said.
Mr Piano's plans for Valletta's new entrance do away with the arcades built after WWII and the shops on one side of Freedom Square. The tenants have to vacate the premises by Saturday.
Environmental NGO Flimkien għal Ambjent Aħjar encouraged all those interested in the capital city, a World Heritage Site, to attend the planning hearing.
It will be held at the Mediterranean Conference Centre, in Valletta at 10 a.m. tomorrow.
16 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Joe E Galea
Mar 25th 2010, 08:03
@Joe Busuttil: It's just a waste of our taxes. A roofless theater is useless as not only the rain is a deterrant, but also the sun, the wind, etc. It's upkeep will be more costly due to weatherring effects and it constantly needs to be cleaned.
Valletta will be raped by Gonzi_piano starting 1st April.
Goodbye Valletta, welcome Babylon!!!
Joe Busuttil
Mar 24th 2010, 19:10
Now can anyone tell me what this is?
Is it an aquarium? No .Is it a tennis court ? No stupid. Is it a blown up greenhouse. Well,looks like one.
You,Renzo,can you tell me what it is ? I a-don't a -know.
Yes Laurence? Is it a roofless opera house ? Yes,clever boy. How did you guess?
Is it possible that you sleep tight at night when you think about the money (ours) you are spending on such a half baked idea? Why not have a roofless HP? After all as the one and only once said in the last legislature, as long as the Govt has a majority any motion will pass.
lgalea
Mar 25th 2010, 09:15
Pity the 20 questions programmes on radio and TV are no longer being made.
g.c.Forte
Mar 25th 2010, 09:20
Dear Joe, I am sorry to tell you that you are wrong in all guesses.................It is a (DIY) " DO IT YOURSELF " model, and you can buy it from any Model Shop. The price is negotiable, and it starts from, 100 million euros if you take the whole set, means a City Gate without a gate, a garden in a ditch, and a parliament on stilts, witch can be used as a tree house, and of course.....THIS. ..................This what ?
victor pulis
Mar 24th 2010, 16:18
The poor showing at the NGOs' protest doesn't prove that the majority is in favour of the project. It proves that the majority are indifferent to Malta's cultural and historical heritage.This is evident whenever there is some correspondence regarding art. You hardly get any comments.
Now call a protest against some tax or utility bill and you'll get thousands. Touch the people's pocket and you're in trouble. Demolish the country's heritage and no one gives a hoot.
Joe Azzopardi
Mar 24th 2010, 15:56
Please note that only SOME Environmental organisations have maintained that the project violates the Structure Plan. The reasoning that Parliament can only be sited in an auberge or palace in Valletta is pathetic and to say the least myopic. This is one of the reasons why eight organisations protested in Valletta earlier this month got such a poor public turnout.
“Environmental NGO Flimkien għal Ambjent Aħjar encouraged all those interested in the capital city, a World Heritage Site, to attend the planning hearing.” to do exactly what? Make noise and a fool of oneself as has happened to often in past few weeks. Arguments, if there are valid, are won by reasoning not noise.
victor pulis
Mar 24th 2010, 15:50
Last Sunday Gozo produced the biggest gbejna. Tomorrow Malta follows suit in producing the biggest kawlata!!
lgalea
Mar 24th 2010, 22:09
Don't insult kawlata my friend.
victor pulis
Mar 24th 2010, 15:46
It has been stated that St. james cavalier will not be obstructed by the new parliament. Try as i might i can't figure out how, a building the size of the new parliament will not hide the best part of the cavalier. The fact that it is being built on 'stilts' does not solve the problem. At best the only part of the cavalier which will be visible will be a strip of bastion at ground level. As for the 'gate' no one seems to be interested that the city of valletta will no longer have a gate but a breach in its fortifications. When entering valletta It will be like passing through a stone quarry.
vincent a galea
Mar 24th 2010, 15:24
Excuse me! What do you mean, "The fate will be sealed tomorrow" ? The decision has been taken ages ago! Have you been fooled as well?
See my contribution in yourL ETTERS page today !!
Karen Zammit Manduca
Mar 24th 2010, 14:55
I think we all know what the outcome of this meeting will be unfortunately - a very sad day for many.
From past conversations I have realised that this will happen, come what may, just because it is considered prestigious for a country to have a Piano designed building. Whether it looks good where it will be situated is irrelevant to those who want it at all costs.
It is like buying an Armani suit and flaunting it at any time, whether you actually like it or not, and whether it suits you or not - just for the name and what you think you will gain by it!
lgalea
Mar 24th 2010, 14:15
The VANDALIZATION of our Capital City by the GONZI-PIANO duo will be approved tomorrow. Piano, you will long be remembered in our history as the one who like JUDAS choose money to betray our Capital City's heritage, a city built by gentlemen for gentlemen.
gxuereb
Mar 24th 2010, 13:46
Piano, piano MEPA before it is too late!!
P.Cassar
Mar 24th 2010, 13:17
SHOW THE ABOVE TO A MILLION F0REIGNERS AND I AM SURE THAT NOT ONE SINGLE INDIVIDUAL WOULD GUESS THAT THIS REPRESENTS MALTA'S FUTURE OPERA HOUSE.
POOR MALTA
Phil Humphries
Mar 24th 2010, 12:08
What an ugly, inappropriate (yet doubtless expensive) piece of tat. How can anyone with a shread of taste and common sense think this is a suitable design for a theatre, let alone a theatre in a World Heritage site?
And how long before the screens in between the permanent scaffolding poles are rented out as advertising hordings, or before they bear statements declaring GonziPN's genious and generosity in bestowing this project to the nation ? - Not long, I'll wager !
This proposal is not only an insult to the Maltese people and the wider cultural world, it is an insult to the memory of all those that perished along with the Opera House in WW2.
Any doubts about Mepa's supposed independence will be clarified tomorrow - I just hope that its members will not allow ego and political ambition to turn this proud city, built by gentlemen, re-planned by vandals, into a cultural sick joke. Mepa must defy the puppet-master and listen to the people for once.
chris borg
Mar 24th 2010, 20:31
"it is an insult to the memory of all those that perished along with the Opera House in WW2. "
How is it an insult? leaving the evidence of the ruins (As Piano is doing), in my opinion, serves as a reminder of those who lost their lives during the war; reconstructing the opera house is only covering up one of the few reminders of what past generations had to endure