Advert

Malta starts issuing 'Malta only' visas for Libyan visitors

Malta has started issuing Malta-only visas for Libyan citizens, while it has formally called on four other EU countries to join it in issuing Limited Territorial Validity (LTV) visas for as long as the visas stalemate between Schengen Area countries and Libya persists.

The Foreign Ministry said today that Foreign Minister Tonio Borg had over the past few hours had meetings with ambassadors of EU countries resident in Malta, where he briefed them about Malta's position and his talks in Tripoli last week with the Libyan Prime Minister.

Dr Borg said he would again raise the issue at the EU Foreign Ministers' meeting on Monday.

Malta, Dr Borg said, is proposing that the EU Mediterranean states should issue visas limited to their territories until the current dispute is settled.

He also formally made the proposal in letters to the foreign ministers of Spain, France, Italy and Portugal.

Dr Borg told the ministers that the current situation was leading to a serious rift in relations between the EU and Libya which would undermine the process of negotiations for an EU-Libya Framework Agreement.

It was in the EU's interest to continue to strengthen relations with Libya, particularly to safeguard progress achieved so far in areas such as the fight against illegal immigration and trade arrangements, Dr Borg said.

While Malta and other countries were continuing to seek a solution to the issue between Switzerland and Libya, an interim solution was urgently needed.

Dr Borg quoted from various provisions of the Schengen Agreement under which party states could issue visas with limited territorial validity "on humanitarian grounds, for reasons of national interest, or because of international obligations" .

He told the ministers that given the exceptional circumstances in which the citizens of their countries had found themselves in when being denied access to Libya, Malta was proposing cooperation between the five EU countries in the form of limited territory visas.

He said that his talks in Tripoli showed that Libya would consider the issuing of such limited Schengen visas as a satisfactory solution.

Advert

48 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Joe Mifsud

Mar 18th 2010, 11:20

I sympathize with you and with those who are in your situation. I hope it all works out for you.

Although it is true that Malta has substantial employees in Libya, does this imply that we are dependent on Libya? Should we just allow them to bully us into putting pressure on Switzerland when it has nothing to do with us? What sort of signals will we be giving to the rest of the world? That whenever you want Malta to do something just threaten us with job cuts (or some other dependency) and Malta will buckle under the pressure? I say, leave it to Switzerland and Libya to deal with their problems, but do not let Libya bully us!

As for schengen, I guess we might as well get out of it... what are the benefits honestly? No passport queues? UK seem to be doing fine without it.

Joseph Ellul - Sydney

Mar 18th 2010, 04:59

The fact is that the Swiss took a decision that affected the rest of Europe because Europe wants the Swiss banks to name and shame the tax avoiders who have illigal money there.
Swiss banks are full of American dollars and will try to help US oil companies to regain contracts in Libya. This will work well for Libya too and the Maltese if they are crafty enough to manage the situation. Not all is what it seems.

Denis Catania

Mar 16th 2010, 19:37

J Martinelli I'm proud of the U.S.A for taking over 300 illegals from Malta and turned them legal, I wish the U.S.A would take all 12,000 of them from Malta. The U.S.A have the room, resources and just as important, illegals have a better chance in the U.S.A once they get issued a green card by our homeland security. Maybe Canada can take one. Well since you brought up the PN and PL as usual. What would have been the reaction of PN supporters, had Mintoff been in this situation and went against an agreement with a number of European countries and opened the door for Libya. Is Malta's utilities cheaper than anywhere in Europe because we give in to Libya on a daily basis. Maybe Malta should include oil exploration to this deal. I'm not totally against this deal, but I would need to bargain and get what's due to Malta. Giving 12,000 illegals Libyan visa's to go back to Libya is another thing I would demand.

Joe Mifsud

Mar 16th 2010, 17:17

Nicely put Chris! The Swiss had all right to do what they did. If the Libyans had done what they had done (in Switzerland) in Malta, you all would be speaking differently!

Besides, it is not ALL Libyans that are being denied entry, but just the culprits. So, why is it that ALL Schengen passport holders are being denied entry to Libya? Why can't the Libyan Government just deny entry for Swiss Government officials, or all Swiss passport holders?

Instead of Malta putting pressure on the Swiss they should instead put pressure on Libya.

C.ZARB

Mar 16th 2010, 19:19

Europe's unity is a myth. Take the illegal immigration problem as an example. We are left to fend on ourselves while mainland Europe hides behind the Dublin treaty which forces immigrants to stay in our country, even if there is no future for them here. Even the US was more helpful then them. Solidarity is a myth in Europe.

Chris Borg

Mar 16th 2010, 19:59

Exactly Joe. I was under the impression that in all only 180 libyans were on the black list. Is Gaddafis action justified? Why all this brown nosing to him??

lgalea

Mar 16th 2010, 21:12

Joe Mifsud Including a 3-year old child that's on the list?
And a previous Minister for Foreign Affairs?
Is this the Swiss diplomacy that you are approving?

lgalea

Mar 16th 2010, 21:14

Joe Mifsud Why did Switzerland involve all the SCHENĠENN countries?
Why did it not limit the ban to Switzerland only?
So should expect Libya not to retaliate in a similar manner?

Chris Borg

Mar 16th 2010, 21:40

I Galea, do you know what schengen countries have no border checks between them?

How can Switzerland not involve all the schengen countries if it has no border control?

Do you have the details about the crime commited and by whom?

From what I can gather, had it been commited by an ordinary person they would have kept him under arrest.

Joe Mifsud

Mar 17th 2010, 10:15

@Igalea
Like Chris has pointed out how else can the swiss keep them out due to schengen borders?

Irrespective. My main point was that 1. they only banned 180 people (culprits + perhaps family etc - I am not commenting on the ethics behind this). So, why can't the Libyan government do the same and ban the Swiss Government officials and their family? Why do they have to ban all schengen countries? I know why... because they want to bully other schengen countries to put the pressure on switzerland... and that's exactly what they have achieved!

Take the analogy, three kids Sara, Luke and Mark. Luke owes Mark money and Sara owes Luke money. However, Luke and Sara fought, so Sara decided not to pay back Luke. Luke then told Mark (who has nothing to do with the quarrel) that he will not pay Mark back unless Sara pays back first. Now, isn't that childish! What does Mark have to do with the quarrel?
Replace Sara, Luke and Mark with Switzerland, Libya and Malta respectively; and replace owes money with 'has to grant access to'.

Alfred Cassar

Mar 16th 2010, 20:22

Pat, there's a 'small' difference. The PN government does it very diplomatically and Mintoff used to do it 'ala salvagga'

Denis Catania

Mar 16th 2010, 15:26

And why can"t we do the same when it comes to the refugee treaty and consider Malta full up.

Advert
Advert