Advert

7,729 booked for ignoring smoking ban

A total of 7,729 persons were found smoking in public areas where smoking was prohibited since the ban was introduced in mid-September 2004, Home Affairs Minister Carm Mifsud Bonnici said in reply to a parliamentary question.

He said the police made regular inspections to curb the abuse.

Advert

40 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

M.Portelli

Mar 17th 2010, 00:23

Ok we won't nag...... Ps - when you develop asthma/emphysemia/COPD/a respiratory infection/lung cancer/pleural cancer etc etc due to smoking would you kindly not nag us or the health services as well and stay at home and enjoy your fatal disease

Thank you

The majority (non-smoking) taxpayers

Paul Barrett

Mar 17th 2010, 20:55

@ M.Portelli

Please remember that us smokers pay an extraordinary amount of money in tax for our bad habit, only a small fraction of the cost of a cigarette actually goes to the actual cost of producing the cigarette.
If we did not contribute so much in tax, other things would be taxed to ensure that the Government still had the same income - this of course would be taken from all tax payers.
The fallacy that stopping smoking would decrease the total health bill can be taken with a pinch of salt. Smoking is only one of the causes of the illnesses you mention - they would still be around with or without smoking. Additionally, as the survival age goes up, the pension bill gets higher which means the workers have to pay more and work longer to support us. Let us at least enjoy some freedom during our short lives - lets have smoking bars and none-smoking bars - I know which will do better financially.

M.Portelli

Mar 17th 2010, 00:18

The only problem I have with your rhetoric is that when you blow out your smoke you are contaminating other people's air. There are a large number of people who do not appreciate inhaling toxic and carcinogenic fumes thank you as well as a number of people with respiratory disorders that will have exacerbations due to your "fun" habit. Personally I think the sooner a blanket ban on public smoking is enforced the better and the healthier society will be for it.

J.Borg

Mar 16th 2010, 15:38

Very good idea indeed. Why should we pay our taxes for peoples health problems when they can be avoided by not smoking.

Joseph Galea

Mar 16th 2010, 18:47

But you have no right to impose your dangerous habit on others.

M.Portelli

Mar 17th 2010, 00:13

And why should I a non-smoker have to avaoid public places because somebody wishes to puff noxious fumes in the air. It is only right that people who wish to cause harm to others are barred from public venues and not vice-versa

Edward Vella

Mar 16th 2010, 11:26

should they impose harsher fines just like america does?

Joseph Galea

Mar 16th 2010, 18:51

So the bar owner said "I could ask them to stop smoke but if they continue I cannot do anything about it...." Of course, he can. He can show them the door. Why does this bar owner favour the smokers, who with their filthy habit endanger the health of his other patrons.

Advert
Advert