Pro-crucifix petition presented to European Parliament
A 10,000 strong petition calling on EU member states to retain the right to allow religious symbols in public places was yesterday presented to the President of the European Parliament, Jerzy Buzek.
The petition will now be examined by the Petitions Committee of the EP, headed by an Italian MEP, who has already promised to take action on its content in a speedy manner.
Presenting the petition, Italian MEP Cristina Muscardini from the European People's Party criticised the decision taken by the European Court of Human rights banning the display of a crucifix in an Italian school. She said it was positive that the court had now accepted to hear Italy's appeal on the issue.
The petition urges the European Parliament to protect the right of EU member states to hold onto their traditions and values and decide for themselves whether or not to display religious symbols in public places such as schools, ministries, hospitals and other administrative edifices.
"Through this petition we want to defend the Cross not only for its religious value but also to defend our fundamental rights as EU citizens," Ms Muscardini told The Times.
"The right of millions of citizens who identify themselves with the Cross cannot be cancelled by a simple court case. The crucifix is also a symbol of our identity which we want to protect."
Last November, the European Court of Human Rights, which is not an EU institution, ruled in favour of a mother in Italy who complained that crucifixes were a religious symbol which did not belong in State-run classrooms and claimed they interfered with the way she wanted to raise her two children.
This decision caused a public uproar in a number of member states particularly those with a strong Christian background including Italy and Malta.
However, following an appeal filed by Italy and backed by the Vatican, the Court last week agreed to re-examine the ruling, saying there were sufficient grounds on which the Italian appeal can be heard.
Malta will be joining Italy's appeal case "on a point of principle".
Announcing the move in Parliament, Prime Minister Gonzi said a country which has upheld particular values and traditions for centuries should not be made to change them just because an individual objects to them.
A date for the hearing of the appeal and a possible decision has not yet been set.
The European Court of Human rights was set up 50 years ago to ensure that states comply with their obligations under the European Convention of Human Rights and its protocols. As an international court it has jurisdiction to deal with applications from individuals or States complaining of violations of the civil and political rights set out in the Convention.
The court's final judgments are binding.
6 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Gerry Cowie
Mar 12th 2010, 20:10
@Ramon Casha - So you finally admit that Christianity is indeed the leading religion in the EU member states - which includes Malta! @Nigel Lawrence - you could make it 10,001!
Nigel Lawrence
Mar 12th 2010, 11:38
10,000 out of so many millions hardly shows popular support.
Ramon Casha
Mar 12th 2010, 10:44
10,000? That kind of petition would merit some attention if the signatures were gathered in Malta, but for the whole of the EU? I'm surprised the numbers are so small, considering that Christianity is the leading religion in all member states.
M Cassar
Mar 12th 2010, 10:22
Especially if that individual is a foreigner...what cheek you go into a foreign country and demand that they remove their religious symbol. If it was me she would have been back in Finland the next day together with her son.
Raymond Sammut
Mar 13th 2010, 04:59
Is your suggestion what the Nazarene on the cross would have wanted? I hardly think so. This issue does not seem to be about the crucifix itself, but more about people feeling insecure. The Nazarene did not accept crucifixion, and all the humiliation that went with it, to create some form of "identity" to some people, and expel the rest. Most importantly, the Nazarene had no intention whatsoever to impose himself in public places. Those who go to Him must go to Him voluntarily and not because Caesar forces them to go. They can do what they like in Italy --it's their responsibility. But on my beloved Malta, Church authorities there should be among the first to insist with the Maltese government to stop misusing the crucifix, and remove it from public places. The Church in Malta needs to focus on its churches and chapels, and its catholic schools instead. Those who want to be in the presence of the crucifix, and embrace all that the crucifix stands for, know exactly where to look for it.
lgalea
Mar 13th 2010, 09:05
Agree with you. Perhaps she didn't know about the saying that when in Rome do as the Romans do. Such arrogance from a foreigner. No one had sent for her and she should be expelled back to her own country.