Advert

Caruana Galizia case: Asst Commissioner denies Magistrate's claim

Assistant Police Commissioner Michael Cassar has denied part of the testimony Magistrate Consuelo Scerri Herrera gave on Monday when she said he had bought her drinks at a popular restaurant.

"It wasn't me. I don't even know where this restaurant is. I never bought a drink for a magistrate or any other citizen. My life is spent at work, at home and at the beach in Marsascala," he said when contacted.

Columnist Daphne Caruana Galizia, who is accused of defaming the magistrate in a series of blogs, posted an entry yesterday saying that, in the circumstances, the public expected the police to take action against the magistrate for giving false testimony.

For Mr Cassar, however, this was probably a question of "mistaken identity".

When asked whether the magistrate could have mistaken him for somebody else given that he was such a prominent figure, the officer said that, since the incident happened seven years ago, he gave the magistrate the benefit of the doubt. But, he insisted, he was never involved in such situations.

In her first in a series of blog entries accusing the magistrate of inappropriate behaviour, Ms Caruana Galizia described an episode in which she and the magistrate were at a ladies' lunch when some "sleazy policemen" sent drinks to their table.

"The rest of us wanted to send the drinks back but the magistrate accepted them... "

In her testimony on Monday in the defamation case instituted by the police acting on a complaint by the magistrate, Dr Scerri Herrera said the men at the table were far from sleazy and included Assistant Commissioner Michael Cassar and an official of the American Embassy.

Ms Caruana Galizia was yesterday questioned by police for allegedly swearing at the magistrate and calling her a liar on her way out of court.

Ms Caruana Galizia denied the claim saying that she said the word liar in private and was not, at the time, even looking at the magistrate on Monday.

cperegin@timesofmalta.com

Advert

31 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

CVella

Mar 12th 2010, 14:49

There is only one weight and one measure on every point in this case.
Behaviour may be correct or compromising
Identity may be mistaken or falsely represented
Redress may follow correct procedure or the alternative route of attempting to influence a witness and to obstruct the course of justice.
Policemen who offer drinks to magistrates place those magistrates in a compromising position.
Magistrates who accept drinks from policemen endorse that compromising behaviour; their sleaziness is only an aggravating factor.

Advert
Advert