Editorial
Another alien idea?
One of the online comments to last week's editorial on the project entrusted by the government to Renzo Piano - which concluded by saying that if one of the world's leading architects is of the opinion that a national theatre should be located elsewhere, who are we to argue? - stated that the colonial mentality in Malta is "alive and strong".
There may be an element of truth in that person's statement - though one could argue quite convincingly that the shadow of colonialism is just a slither of its former self - but if there is, it was used in the wrong context.
We did not take that line because Mr Piano comes from the beautiful Italian port of Genoa nor indeed because he is based in the fashionable French capital. We did so because of the credentials he possesses as an architect with renowned artistic flair who just happens, at the moment, to be building an opera house in Athens. He could have come from Comino and it would not have made the slightest difference.
One can disagree with the concept of having a parliament building in Freedom Square. In that case, blame the government, not Mr Piano. And one can consider his designs to be as ugly as the Pompidou Centre, which many think is a blot on the otherwise pristine Parisian landscape. After all, everyone is entitled to an opinion.
But when an expert of such calibre has been brought in to advise on what can be done and vice versa - and that expert says an opera house there is not doable - one cannot question his judgment unless one is sufficiently qualified to do so.
However, now we have a real problem, because another man from a foreign land has decided to wade into the mire (see front page story). Theatre impresario Cameron Mackintosh does not believe it makes sense to turn the ruins into a closed theatre either, with arguments ranging from the area being too cramped to economic inviability.
He also thinks he has an alternative, which is to make the Mediterranean Conference Centre suitable for such a purpose.
Time will tell whether money will allow that to be possible - we can only hope it does - but Sir Cameron should have some idea of what he is talking about. He owns seven of London's leading theatres and, according to press reports, has amassed a £635 million fortune from the industry to boot. Also, crucially for some, his mother was of Maltese descent.
All these credentials could well add weight to his assertion that not only are Mr Piano's plans "aesthetically pleasing to the eye", but the venue as proposed would be suitable for open air summer musical theatre and performance.
Anyone who disagrees may do well to cast an eye towards the Italian architect's home country: At the arena in Verona every summer they hold a magnificent opera festival. Though it does not have a roof - perhaps some brave soul with a loudspeaker should walk into the city centre and suggest they add one - the audience do not care much for the surrounding noise and mind even less if drops of water land on their designer clothing.
Since the historic Italian city is several hundred miles north of Malta, and has weather that is habitually more inclement, their use of the arena in this manner can only prove one thing: that these damn former colonial powers never get anything right... Or are we the problem?
3 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
george farrugia
Mar 7th 2010, 19:18
I just want the building to be restored in its original format... imagine the beauty that beholds one's eye on entering our city...the impression it will provide to visitors and image that the Maltese do in fact appreciate fine architecture , not just in word, but also in deed. If modern theatrical requirements are not suited to the new building, then this can be used for other purposes, example a museum for fine arts etc... but the use is irrelevant... its the esthetic beauty that such a building creates that is important. What I cannot understand is that for the millenium project the nation spent so much money on the Cavilleri project that provided us with a theatre that houses about 50 people in all.... and now the authorities are being shy from investing in such a beautiful architectural works or art. If funds are a problem... I bet most Maltese will tell you to forgo the Parliament glass box and go for the theatre instead.
Wenzu Vella
Mar 7th 2010, 13:55
There is enough room to build the opera house on the same style as the old one, on a bigger scale on the original site.
As for the parliament house, this should either be build on an other site or better still should be located in one of the other historical sites in the city.
As for Sir Cameron Mackintosh, perhaps this wealthy gentleman would be very happy to make a small donation towards the building of this magnificent opera house, which I'm sure the people of Malta would forever remember him by honour him with a beautiful marble plaque expressing their gratitude for his generosity.
msciberras
Mar 7th 2010, 11:25
What people want is the original building being rebuilt............it need not be used as an opera house..............that is what everyone seems to be ignoring!!! Surly a rebulit Barry's building can be used to house a Parliament!!! How on earth can a fossilized relic with a canopy be considered as a replacement for such a beautiful building.........Have we not lost enough in Valletta thanks to the war....just think of the hideous GWU building that has replaced a bombed auberge, the lost Chapel of Bones......people do not care who came up with the idea be it Piano or the pope! People do not like it period, the negative reactions it has raised are too strong too ignore!!!! As Prince Charles has been brave enough to show in the Chelsea Barracks redevelopment controversy in London, the ideas of many architects, including Piano himself (a member of that consortium) are plain unattractive except to those who share the architects' own artistic tastes. And they seem to be pathologically opposed to 'restoring' as in restoring a buiding or urban environment to its original condition, as this would be the great 'travesty' of replacing the original with a 'fake'.