The government's split second
Two years ago, the Nationalist Party came back from behind to celebrate a dramatic election victory by a mere 1,580 votes. Herman Grech takes a snapshot of the government's second year in office.
Nationalist supporters were still carcading on the streets celebrating a third successive victory at the polls when signs emerged that Lawrence Gonzi may face an uphill struggle.
With political heavyweights like Louis Galea failing to secure a parliamentary seat, former ministers upset at the way they were dismissed, and some new MPs demanding a bigger role in the government, Dr Gonzi was dogged with internal problems from the beginning - and all this amid a looming global recession.
Many said they were just teething problems until his wafer-thin parliamentary majority got to work - but the notion of dissent became louder during Dr Gonzi's second year in power.
The electoral motif 'Gonzipn' might have won the Nationalists the March 2008 election but the implications of this strategy have sometimes served as a noose around the Prime Minister's neck.
Dr Gonzi has consistently been accused of living in a self-imposed cocoon, lending an ear only to a handful of advisers. Internal party wounds, which festered through the many leaks, showed disgruntled backbenchers were upset that they were being kept in the dark - a dangerous state of affairs in a government with a one-seat majority.
Yet many said the backbench rebellion was a result of Dr Gonzi's reluctance to exercise his authority and put his foot down with undisciplined MPs seeking personal glory.
There was clearly a communication problem which created unnecessary rifts, including the well-known public fallout with outgoing EU Commissioner Joe Borg.
John Dalli, who assumed the self-given role of 'father confessor' for the disgruntled within the PN parliamentary group, is Malta's new Commissioner in Brussels, and Speaker Louis Galea has been nominated for the EU Court of Auditors. Inadvertently, midway through the legislature, the PN group is rejuvenating itself, though some wonder whether it has lost too much experience in one go.
The Prime Minister has seemingly cooled, at least for the time being, the simmering discontent in his group, thanks in particular to a proposal to 'twin' backbenchers with ministers.
Yet despite the internal problems and the worst international recession in 75 years, the government cannot be criticised for its handling of the the economy, and the number of reforms currently underway show it is delivering on certain fronts.
While the economic performance of countries like Greece and Spain have sent alarm bells ringing across the EU, tiny Malta has ventured on, despite the odd hiccup, without the need for tough austerity measures.
But while, on one hand, the government should be applauded for incentivising sectors that are producing jobs, it once again dealt them a major blow by hiking up water and electricity prices, making it impossible for some of the same companies it is assisting to prosper.
The economy
Dr Gonzi said he was putting jobs at the top of his agenda - and the results are clearly paying off.
The government should be credited for coming up with schemes intended to create jobs, even if the initiative came at a cost to the deficit. No less than €80 million was handed out in various investment schemes which benefited 2,194 businesses or individuals.
Along with Germany and Luxembourg, Malta has the lowest jobless rate in the EU, statistics show. During the last budget a record sum was allocated to education and more money was pumped into the Employment and Training Corporation, which last year found jobs for over 4,000 people.
Dr Gonzi said he expects the country to exit the recession by June, probably after most other EU states. The slowdown hit the island after other EU countries - but employers' associations have warned that the new energy rates can only serve to prolong the recession. In 2009, there was a decrease of €663.7 million in imports and a drop of €432.8 million in exports.
The deficit at the end of 2009 was 3.8 per cent for 2009 (above the permitted EU threshold) while government debt outstanding at the end of January was up €295 million compared with January last year.
The government insists it cannot loosen the fiscal belt if Malta is to avoid emulating Greece's economic haemorrhage.
Mepa reform
The long-awaited reform, which promises to cut down waiting time, inject transparency and streamline activities, is finally being discussed in Parliament.
Hailed by several organisations, criticised by other NGOs who felt it was not far-reaching enough, the consensus was that any reform to what had become Malta's white elephant had to be good news.
But after years of controversy, where it was accused of corruption and blamed for contributing to environmental disasters, it will take years for the public to trust Mepa.
Valletta project
Renzo Piano's proposal for the Valletta entrance was inaugurated with much ado last June. But once the celebratory fireworks settled, there has been mounting criticism of the plans - with artists in particular criticising the decision to locate the new Parliament building in Freedom Square and to turn the former opera house site into an open-air theatre.
Malta has the best chance to see Valletta's entrance being revived from the wrath of war and the architectural disasters of the 1960s. In the meantime, away from major controversy, St George's Square and St Anne's Square in Sliema were given a much-needed facelift.
Illegal immigration
The number of boat people fleeing Africa dropped drastically in the past year - not thanks to any EU intervention, but due to a pushback deal struck between Italy and Libya, through which Malta benefitted as a third party.
The deal was criticised by humanitarian organisations but the government decided to sit on the fence, fully aware it was walking a tight- rope amid calls for a suspension of Malta's international obligations. The government was right to ignore a proposal by the Labour Party to take a more radical approach with immigration in the run-up to the European Parliament elections.
As Italy questioned the size of the island's search and rescue zone, Malta entered into diplomatic spats with Rome over who should assume responsibility for immigrants saved at sea.
Warden service reform
Proposals for a reform of the wardens system, announced last week, include issuing warning tickets instead of fines for first offenders and incremental fines for repeat offenders.
The proposed changes are, of course, expected to be welcomed in a country known for its indiscipline, but if they serve to educate rather than fill local councils' coffers, then they would have served a worthy purpose.
Popularity
There is little doubting that the popularity of the Nationalist administration has nosedived in its second year. Hefty electricity prices, party in-fighting and a new Labour Party leader were among the factors which led to a PN trouncing at last June's European Parliament elections.
It is the norm for governments worldwide to hit a low ebb midway through the legislature. A survey in The Sunday Times in March 2005 showed 75 per cent of respondents were dissatisfied with the way the government was running the country. That was two years after a general election - and less than a year after Malta joined the EU.
Similar sentiments for the same party in government, two years after re-election, and in the midst of an unprecedented global recession, are therefore not surprising - though there is a growing feeling that the administration is creaking with age and that complacency has set in.
Environment
Government aid for alternative energy projects, such as solar water heaters and photovoltaic cells, coupled with more waste separation schemes meant environmental awareness is finally on the agenda.
But more drastic action is needed - and fast - to counter years of inertia. Illegal groundwater extraction remains rampant - and has the government's blessing - despite experts' advice that Malta could soon run out of this irreplaceable natural resource.
There have been delays to drawing up renewable energy targets, there are still no concrete measures to reduce air pollution, even if the phasing out of old buses should do wonders for the air we breathe.
And serious questions still hover over why the Delimara power station should be powered by heavy fuel. The list goes on.
Health reform
Waiting lists and bed shortages continued to dog the new Mater Dei Hospital.
The stories which made headlines recently did little to inject confidence - a patient was resuscitated in a corridor after suffering a heart attack, a woman gave birth on a stretcher in an examination room rather than in a delivery room, and parts of the Emergency Department and corridors were being used as a ward.
The health reform announced by John Dalli before his departure to Brussels was initially met positively. But as the details started emerging and questions were raised over a crucial proposal which would force people to go to their private doctor, it was MPs on the government side who threatened to derail it. New Health Minister Joe Cassar insists it is still up for discussion.
Water and electricity tariffs
No union lobbying and street protests could stop another hefty hike in energy tariffs.
The public, especially the working class, is right to feel resentment and say the increases will deal a major blow to their standard of living. In the midst of a recession, and with businesses warning of redundancies, it is probably the most ill-timed decision of the government in its second year.
Consumers should not be expected to suddenly pay for years of waste and inefficiencies - despite the high oil prices.
Public transport reform
The long-awaited proposals include a wider network, new hubs and penalties for misbehaviour.
Commuters are relieved that the notoriously poor bus service is finally being tackled - though they cannot be blamed for thinking why it had to cost the taxpayer €54 million, while giving a 10-year-job guarantee to the drivers who gave the sector such a bad name.
18 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
lgalea
Mar 8th 2010, 13:57
Anthony Briffa Dak li gara fl-1981 kien skond il-KOSTITUZZJONI u Mintoff kellu dritt jiggverna kif kien se jaghmel il-Partit NAzzjonalista fl-1971 kieku tella dak id-deputat l-iehor fuq id-distrett ta' Hal-Qormi kif wera li kien jaghmel minhabba n-numru ta' drabi li tabal biex jergghu jinghaddu l-voti ghax ma riedx jemmen li minkejj l-gerrymandering li kien ghamel ma kienx se jirnexxilu jerga' jkun fil-gvern, u dan kollu minkejja li kien gab eluf ta; voti inqas mill-MLP. Dik hija l-veriat' li hadd ma jista' jichad sur Briffa.
P. Schembri
Mar 8th 2010, 09:44
@Ray Sammut. 3 years is a long time in politics!
Raymond Sammut
Mar 8th 2010, 01:00
@ P. Schembri --"no.2 votes" are not "votes", as you keep trying to claim. They are preferences. Also, AD votes were just that, AD votes (not MLP votes). Oranges (AD) plus lemons (MLP) is a meaningless summation. And once more I need to say to you that the current PN government is a majority government. I have already explained to you why this is so, and you can confirm my explanation with the electoral commissioner.
The hard cold fact about present Malta's politics is this. If PN would (1) replace Dr Gonzi with a new leader, (2) dump, expel and disown all the pseudo-advisers Gonzi had been labouring under these past three years, (3) separate state from church, and (4) start getting serious about deporting illegal immigrants, then they would still be able to put themselves on track to winning the next election. It's up to them. If the PN want to continue to govern after the next election, it's up to them; they still have enough time left to sort things out --no matter what Dr Muscat will try to do.
P. Schembri
Mar 7th 2010, 19:26
@Ray Sammut. Doesn't matter what the no.2 votes were. Only thing certain is that the No.1 votes were not for the PN and that's what counts! No1 votes of both the PL and AD total to more than the PN had to win the election. Hence, the PN government is a minority government.
M Cassar
Mar 7th 2010, 18:52
Pn looks to the past to forget the present situation Pn has put Malta in. We are on the way to become another Greece, facts being hidden, the people fooled,robbed and deceived. The PL looks at the present catastrophic situation Pn has put us in and the future. That is the difference. One is melanchonic and a total failure:PN. The other the last hope for Malta: PL. You can keep mentioning the past as much as you like but we are living in the present and looking to the future. A very precarious future for our country after 20 years of incompetence and much much worse than simply incompetent. There is a deep stench of corruption here. I will once again ask all the Pn supporters. Where di all the money go. Please provide me with an online website were I as a maltese citizen can check where all the hard earned money paid in taxes for years on end went. Obviously they will ignore this and become melanchonic about the past.
Raymond Sammut
Mar 7th 2010, 17:01
@ P. Schembri
The MLP (not the PL) was not trusted. That's why the PL is in opposition. If the survey reflects the true political situation currently in Malta, then the PL is trusted and may win government at the next election. But no-one is going to know until then. I personally would continue to hold the view that the PL is a party not to be trusted.
Raymond Sammut
Mar 7th 2010, 16:54
@ P. Schembri
You are making an unfounded allegation. You can only prove what you are claiming if you can assert that AD preferences were firmly MLP. This is usually very difficult to do.
Normally we would say (with absolute confidence): "PN led over other parties in first preference votes". As far as I know, this was the case at the last election.
To prove your point (at least to some extent) you would have to look carefully (which is a difficult process) at how the AD first preference votes were distributed among PN and MLP candidates at the last election. Even if done correctly, it still would not be a very reliable measure of prevailing political sentiment among voters (this especially if many of the re-distributed votes belonged to floaters).
P. Schembri
Mar 7th 2010, 16:30
@R. Sammut. If the PL is not being trusted, how come that Joseph Muscat is 13% points ahead of Lawrence Gonzi in the Trust Survey that was carried out by another local English newspaper? PL is in the forefront in the survey, and the PN is very far behind! How's that for your information?
P. Schembri
Mar 7th 2010, 16:07
@J. Martinelli. Like it or not, the PL had every right to continue governing the country in 1981. But the power hungry PN, and EFA's last hope of continuing to be a PN leader, or eventually becoming a PM was hanging by a thread. Something had to be done to destabilise the legitimate government. So the result was boycotts, industrial actions, bombs, demonstrations and all kinds of political activities under the sun, provocations, and what not! At least that kept the people away from thinking what's the truth behind it all! Today, as I said before, the PN has no majority, save a relative one!
Raymond Sammut
Mar 7th 2010, 15:24
@ P. Schembri
It doesn't work like that. In a democratic system, if a party wins the largest number of seats, then that party has the right to govern and is asked to form a government. Only if the number of seats, after having formed the new government, is a minority, that government is then defined as a minority government.
In your case, adding the PL votes and the AD votes together would be useful only if the addition yielded more seats that would allow either the PL or the AD to form a government (regardless of whether it's a minority or a majority government).
In 1981, the MLP was a majority government because it had secured more seats than the PN. The political travesty emanated from the fact that due to gerrymandering, the proportionality rule --stipulated in Malta's constitution-- was violated; that is, more seats with less votes. As we say in Maltese, iż-żejt tela' f'wiċċ l-ilma. As a result, Labour in Malta became --and probably still is-- a party not to be trusted.
J Martinelli
Mar 7th 2010, 14:10
@ P. Schembri
But not like we had in 1981 !
P. Schembri
Mar 7th 2010, 12:53
@Lawrence Fenech. No the PN government hasn't got the majority of the Maltese Population behind him. If the PL votes and AD votes are added together, bye bye GonziPN's majority! We really have a minority government.
joe falzon
Mar 7th 2010, 11:55
@lawrence fenech....speaking of politics in general---- a majority doesn't give you the right to do whatever you like. it gives you the duty to fulfill your pre-election campaign promises which garners you the majority of votes
Raymond Sammut
Mar 7th 2010, 11:52
Dr Gonzi is not "sitting on the fence" in regard to the Berlusconi pushback policy. Dr Gonzi has, in fact, his hands tied up by influential church people both in Malta and abroad. Once the pushback policy in Italy ceases, Dr Gonzi will be once more channeling illegal aliens sent to him by smugglers back through Hay Wharf. If the Maltese people want to rid themselves of illegal immigration, and protect their national border, then they have to vote Dr Gonzi out of office. If, on the other hand, the PN want to retain government, then they have to replace Dr Gonzi with a new leader whose hands are free from the jaws of church influence.
leo attard
Mar 7th 2010, 11:51
VALLETTE PROJECT
when mommy is complaining that the household is in financial dire straits and has to take a chunk out of her children's pocket money, seriously effecting their standards of living --- it's a shame she uses that money to go to the beauty parlor
Anthony Briffa
Mar 7th 2010, 11:16
@ Lawrence Fenech
Lawrence Gonzi won the election in 2008 and has the right to govern. It was Mintoff and the MLP in 1981 who did not have the right to govern as they obtained the majority of seats with a minority of votes. They stole liberty from us Maltese for a further period of 7 years up to June 1987.
Lawrence Fenech
Mar 7th 2010, 10:54
Pero 1,400 vot ? mghandux dritt li jghamel li irid.
Louise Vella
Mar 7th 2010, 10:44
Illegal immigration
The pushback deal between Italy and Malta is the best thing that ever happened to Malta. Dr Gonzi should say a big Thank You to Berlusconi, instead of sitting on the fence. Without the pushback deal Malta would be getting thousands upon thousands of illegal immigrants every year, over and above the 10 000 that are already roaming the streets of our towns and villages.
Dr Gonzi should know that the vast majority of the common people of Malta, foremost among them Nationalists, approve of Berlusconi’s pushback policy. In an online poll by maltarightnow, 5721 answered the question: “What do you think about the fact that Italy is sending boats with immigrants back to Libya?” 90% said it was good, 7% that it was bad and 3% said don’t know. See
http://www.maltarightnow.com/?module=poll&mode=view&poll=119
By approving Berlusconi’s pushback policy Dr Gonzi would not be walking a tight rope at all but reflecting the strongly held views of the Maltese people, including Nationalists.