Crucifix ruling to be revised
States have right to decide
The European Court of Human Rights yesterday agreed to hear Italy's appeal on a controversial ruling given last year banning crucifixes in state-run schools.
A panel of five judges at the Strasbourg-based court yesterday said it took note of an appeal filed by the Italian government last January and the court's Grand Chamber "definitively" will rule on the matter.
Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini promptly expressed satisfaction that the Court had accepted Italy's arguments for an appeal.
"I would like to underline that the Court has accepted our numerous and articulate motives, which Italy presented to the Court," Mr Frattini said.
Last November, the court, which has nothing to do with the EU, ruled in favour of an Italian mother who complained that crucifixes were a religious symbol that did not belong in state-run classrooms because that would violate the way in which she wanted to raise her two children.
The Italian government, backed by the Vatican, defended the presence of crucifixes in public schools as a traditional symbol that extended beyond the country's Christian roots.
While Catholicism is the dominant faith in Italy, the 1948 constitution specifies that there is no state religion.
Following the Strasbourg-court's decision, the European Commission defended its member states' right to keep deciding freely on such issues, adding that according to EU rules issues related to culture and religion were up to member states to decide.
A Commission spokesman had explained that the ruling had no effect on Malta as the Court did not form part of EU institutions. "The EU has nothing to do with this ruling of the Court of Human Rights and we respect the liberty of every member state to decide on these issues," the spokesman said.
The Court decision had sparked a controversy in Malta with many opining against the decision.
7 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Joseph Aquilina
Mar 7th 2010, 22:22
@Ian Grech
What I suggest is that all who believe start reading the Bible not history books. That is the most important priority.
Joseph Aquilina,Ontario, CANADA
Ian Grech
Mar 5th 2010, 14:32
"God won't hurt anybody": May I suggest all who believe so buy some history books.
Joseph Aquilina
Mar 5th 2010, 02:21
@R Grima,
Try to do the same thing in their country. Take Muhammed's picture off the walls to please outsiders with different beliefs and then watch for the results.
I remember when I was in school in Valletta, we had a Jewish student, and when it was time for religion classes, he was excused, but we did not have to change anything to siut anyone else. So, if they don't like it they should get on a plane or a ship and ship out..
Joseph Aquilina, Ontario, CANADA
R Grima
Mar 4th 2010, 06:48
An agreement to hear an appeal does not mean the original decision will necessarily be reversed. Surely an example of miss-reporting ,for want of a better description.
Religious symbols of any kind have no place in a State school which by necessity must cater for to all of it's Citizens regardless of Religion and beliefs(or non)
Emanuel Scicluna
Mar 4th 2010, 06:46
@Gerry Cowie
I just Agree with you 100%.
Joseph Aquilina
Mar 4th 2010, 00:54
@Gerry Cowie,
Well said Gerry. God is a good God and He is Awesome. Why are people attacking a good God when He wishes all that is good for all people? Smarten up people and see what is good for you.
Joseph Aquilina, Ontario, CANADA
Gerry Cowie
Mar 3rd 2010, 19:38
A victory for common sense and nothing for secularists to worry about.
God won't hurt anybody, by being up on a wall in any public place.
You can ignore him but He won't ignore you!