Stricter law for bouncers
Plan to set up security authority
Bouncers at entertainment outlets will have special obligations placed on them under a new Bill to be published in the coming days.
New licences would be issued to both security guards at entertainment establishments and private guards protecting valuables, government sources said. However, a net distinction would be made between the two types and the new licences would outline their specific duties and obligations.
The new law will amend the existing Private Guards And Local Wardens Act, which already establishes that private guards have to be licensed. However, the level of regulation has been deemed to be insufficient following a spate of incidents involving security personnel at clubs.
The latest incident, last Tuesday, saw two men - 41-year-old Stephen Catania and 25-year-old Bernard Briffa - being accused of the attempted murder of two Italians early on Sunday morning and of working as private guards without a licence. Both pleaded not guilty.
According to a spokesman for the Justice Ministry, the Bill would be published in the Government Gazette in the coming days.
The government is in the process of introducing regulations for bouncers and security officers employed in bars and night clubs. The draft was modelled on the UK's Private Security Industry Act. The plan is to set up a security authority similar to Britain's Security Industry Authority.
Sunday's incident comes less than a year after Sudanese illegal immigrant Suleiman Abubaker died from a blow to the head. Duncan Deguara, a 29-year-old bouncer at Footloose Bar in Paceville, was charged with grievously injuring Mr Abubaker.
Soon after Mr Abubaker's death, representatives from the Chamber of Small and Medium Enterprises - GRTU met Justice Minister Carm Mifsud Bonnici to suggest regulations for nightclub security staff.
13 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Joe Genovese
Feb 22nd 2010, 14:55
Mr Micalllef, please bear with me awhile, in the hope that it will emerge who's not getting the point.
"Condemn" is as familiar with schoolboys and grown-ups as unlicensed bouncers are common in Malta's clubs.
Then comes a time when the schoolboy comes across the more erudite-sounding "condone" and, in the mistaken belief that sounding almost the same must mean also meaning the same, frowns upon that which is common and elects for the rare "alternative".
So, for the schoolboy, the pedestrian is consigned to the lexical garbage can to be replaced by the esoteric, reinforcing the misconception that using it shows one possesses more grey matter than the average mug.
Without further putting too fine a point on it,.......do you get the point now?
John Micallef
Feb 19th 2010, 08:12
A typical example of how things works on this island.
More than the minister for this, i feel more comfortable to thank the italian embassy in Malta!
Luigi Tomassi
Feb 18th 2010, 22:34
@ J Micallef. You do have a point. And I don't think Joe Genovese derided you for your spelling mistake as such, because you spelt the word correctly in fact, but the word itself was wrong. Since your English was perfect, the word 'condone' might have been a bit of a shock, because that means that you 'support' violence.
MIchael Muscat
Feb 18th 2010, 18:51
So it takes two Italians to be almost beaten to death for the government to finally introduce proper regulations! I wonder when the government will decide to PROPERLY regulate the nightlife industry in its totality once and for all. May I point out that this incident in particular took place partly due to the fact that the nightclub in question was closed down at 4 am.....
J Micallef
Feb 18th 2010, 17:40
@Joe Genovese
Oh sorry...I guess you have a higher standard of education and you judge people by their words and spelling!!!!!!!!...........well you got the point!!!!
c. camilleri
Feb 18th 2010, 17:13
Greece has taught us a lesson how to treat bouncers who go over the limit with resultant death. Malta is still pondering what to do while people are being beaten up with occasional deaths.
Joe Genovese
Feb 18th 2010, 16:05
"I condone all sort of violence ....."
Mr Micallef, then it's little wonder you wrote what you wrote
"Condemn", perhaps. But condone.....?
J Micallef
Feb 18th 2010, 15:52
I condone all sort of violence but if one or two people commit a crime it does not mean all bouncers are the same....Its the same like when a magistrate is corrupt it doen not mean all the judiciary is corrupt. If a policeman is caught dealing in drugs it does not mean all the police force do the same. And using the same yardstick, if a bar owner should be held responsible for the wrongdoing of a bouncer, then the minister of justice should have resigned when the corrupt magistrate was found guilty, and the commissioner of police should have resigned when a police constable was caught dealing in drugs.....food for thought!!!
T Mifsud
Feb 18th 2010, 14:01
Security Authority is the wrong name! It should not indicate something to do with National Security, Homeland Security, Border Control, Public Security etc.
I would suggest the following: Private Security Authority, Security Licencing Directorate, Security Personnel Authority
Joe Genovese
Feb 18th 2010, 12:34
The law should draw the GRTU in this, in that its members undertake on signing up not to take on unlicensed bouncers.
This would apply to all members, not just to the wannabies.
Infringement of such a rule should make the member liable to breach of a legal contract as well as instant expulsion.
As a self-regulating body with the community's general interest in mind and at heart, that wouldn't be beyond its remit.
Ramon Casha
Feb 18th 2010, 11:16
The venues must be held liable for damages caused by the actions of the bouncers they employ. A nightclub owner is more likely to choose bouncers carefully and keep an eye on their behaviour if they know that they can lose half a year's profits when their bouncers beat up someone.
Vince DeBono
Feb 18th 2010, 10:18
I don't know about the old law or the draft amendments, but if today we get people working illegally as Security guards and they are not stopped by the authorities, what good will extra legislation be? ... without enforcement?
Why not go this evening and cull all the illegal bouncers ( and underage drinkers, unlicensed establishments and employees without a workbook ....) instead of wait until a new law and potentially another '''incident'''.
J Oatmon
Feb 18th 2010, 10:07
Well I really hope these proposed laws will impose high fines and/or withdrawal of licenses on the club/bar owners and/or the premises, in the event of illegal activity caused by their bouncers.
If it is just the bouncers who get fined - they will just move on to something else, like driving a minibus with schoolkids or a taxi with tourists.