MEPs vote for tuna trade ban
The European Parliament yesterday backed a resolution calling for a total ban of international trade in tuna fishing, reflecting the stand adopted by the majority of EU member states.
A counter proposal tabled by five MEPs from the EPP, including Nationalist MEP Simon Busuttil, proposing controlled fishing rather than a total ban, was defeated as the majority of Socialist MEPs voted against the amendment.
Malta's four MEPs present for the vote - Labour's John Attard Montalto, Louis Grech and Edward Scicluna and Dr Busuttil - adopted the same approach against a total ban and voted in favour of the EPP amendment. Alas, this was not enough because the majority of Socialist and Liberal MEPs voted in favour together with a few MEPs from the EPP's side.
Nationalist MEP David Casa was not present during the voting session.
Although the EP's resolution does not have any legal consequences, it piles pressure on the European Commission to support a ban in view of the crucial UN meeting to be held in Doha, Qatar next month.
The Commission could so far not agree on a common position due to divergent opinions between outgoing Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas and Fisheries Commissioner Joe Borg. Now that both have been replaced, the Commission is expected to recommend its support for a ban in the coming days.
Malta, together with another five EU member states, last year managed to block a similar Commission initiative supporting a ban.
Since then, France and Italy, key allies with a stake in the tuna industry, changed their stand against a ban and said they would support one.
This means the coalition against the ban is not big enough to block the proposal.
In a debate preceding yesterday's vote, Dr Busuttil took the floor urging fellow MEPs to take a more lenient approach on the issue.
"We cannot destroy the tuna industry once and for all with a total ban," Dr Busuttil said.
"There is a middle and moderate road, which we should take. Annex II of the Cites Convention provides for more controls without a need of a total ban. I urge fellow MEPs to choose this way. We shouldn't destroy the livelihood of fishermen," he argued.
Labour MEP Edward Scicluna tabled a speech calling for bluefin tuna to be placed on Appendix I of Cites. He said the EU should apply "common sense and proportionality" rather than back a ban that would cause huge damage to the Maltese economy.
6 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
lgalea
Feb 11th 2010, 15:09
C Cassar The situation is not due to the Maltese fishermen but to the greedy Spanish, French and Italian fishermen Mr Cassar. So why should the Maltese fishermen who use lines to catch tuna and not drift nets etc be penalized for the other fishermen wrongdoings? Your reasoning means that because a criminal has committed a criminal act then all the people should be condemned.
adrian aquilina Don't eat anything Mr aquilina.
C Cassar
Feb 11th 2010, 14:00
The ban is coming years too late. Due to the greedy fisherman you simply take as much as they can of which isn't theirs in the first place. They have no respect for nature or the environment whatsoever.
Theres plenty of other work to be done on the Maltese islands, so no shortage of work for "ex" fishermen. Cleaning up the country side, keeping the promenades clean for example.
Just take a look at the "fishermen" in Spinola bay, regularly throwing whatthey don't need into the sea and leaving loads of rubbish lying around when they are "refurbishing" their boats. They seem to think they have a right to take over public footpaths and any piece of land that borders the water.
adrian aquilina
Feb 11th 2010, 13:32
great result..well done to the countries that voted for a ban....lets ban all trade that is harmfull to enviroment and living creatures..time for a new way of doing things in this world that does not involve ruining nature and all that live alongside us...doing things because of money must now stop and malta must adapt and stop being so ignorant and selfish
N.Lawrence
Feb 11th 2010, 11:35
Just how much are we paying David Casa to be "not present".
Charles Caruana
Feb 11th 2010, 11:25
Shame on David Casa. Where was he when Malta needed him?
An important vote where he let us all down on an issue which endangers the future of a thriving industry.
Who polices our representatives?
Michelle Gauci
Feb 11th 2010, 10:27
Why wasn't David Casa present for a vote on an issue that is so crucial for the Maltese fishin industry? Could he do anything else to further prove that he has done absolutely nothing since getting reelected last June? Oh sorry no I'm mistaken: he managed to ask the sillest question to a Commissioner designate during the hearings.