Escaped migrant makes it to Brussels
An illegal immigrant who was repatriated to Malta after he escaped and managed to make it to Brussels was this morning jailed for six months, the minimum allowed by law.
Belo Akilu, 24, who used to workas a house-keeping assistant at the Hilton Malta, was repatriated by the Belgian authorities three days ago.
Legal aid lawyer Renzo Porsella Flores asked the court to take into consideration that Mr Akilu was very sorry for committing the crime, however, his intention was never to land in Malta but to visit relatives on mainland Europe.
Magistrate Lawrence Quintano said that while he appreciates the circumstances in which Mr Akilu found himself, the court could not ignore Malta's international obligations.
58 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
sean grima
Feb 17th 2010, 11:36
if at all, anti-immigrant (read dark-skinned) comments are destabilising. our politicians have always stated that whatever action is taken must respect malta's legal obligations.
Joe Xuereb
Feb 15th 2010, 22:33
2) Some people - Tanti, Matthew? - go through life blaming their misery on their location. They try London and hate it. They dream of Jamaica but not really viable. So they are stuck wherever it is they are stuck. They need to know that 'happiness' comes from within and has nothing to do with location. Except that, like in the marriage/divorce debate, if you are in a destructive one, marriage ie. you must out. Happiness, like location, is not another person. But another person can surely destroy you, especially if you fall victim to the Stockholm Syndrome.
Malta has more than enough of its own home-bred illegals. When an alien one escapes, let him go. Good riddance to destabiliser (unfortunately internation obbligations dictate otherwise). This means that said destabiliser returns to Malta. No mercy. One piece of destabilising influence back on MY doorstep. Malta, deal with it. If only there were a way, with a little help from your children, not to fall victim to the Stockholm Syndrome.
Meanwhile, nobody ever called me shameful. alhamdulillah - or something.
I think we should all shut up and entrust the solution to our woes to our political leaders
Joe Xuereb
Feb 15th 2010, 22:28
1) I have been told in no uncertain terms that, as an ex-patriate, I have no right to pontificate. Nice one. And I say, I will fight for anyone to express their opinion. This gives them all the rope they need to hang themselves. And I will recognise them by the colour of the shirt. As for pontification, I leave that to the pontiff, he who refuses condoms to black africans so they can multiply, be indoctrinated and replenish a dwindling catholic poplulation in Europe. Not unlike a healthy lawn being destroyed by an alien weed.
I am an atheist (I see Opus Dei for what it is, in other words) and a homosexual to boot. Those are insufferable disclosures to many. But such disclosure make me untouchable (as in 'disarm' your attacker in you're OK). Anyone who is stupid enough to attack me on those fronts is only damaging themselves. But will they listen? Some people MUST have something to hate in order to justify their miserable existence. Meanwhile, I just sail on, sails billowing, the wind behind me. An untouchable.
cont./
sean grima
Feb 15th 2010, 19:17
i wonder which political party will be winning it mela, given that none of them advocates such a policy!
Trevor Lorenzo Mizzi
Feb 13th 2010, 18:26
@sean grima,
Any political party in the next election that does not put Malta and the maltese first and is not willing to repatriate these illegal economic migrants will not get elected.
sean grima
Feb 12th 2010, 13:53
it seems that joe xuereb (like most of the African migrants, according to some commentators here) has nothing better to do all day. anyone who visits the link he posted will realise how people of all races and origins have commented positively, except for him.
@TL Mizzi: perhaps you may indicate which party you will be electing which shares your vision? It will be a big surprise, since neither PN, nor MLP nor AD do.
Joe Xuereb
Feb 12th 2010, 00:06
2) Pari passo, of course, many African nations - they too attained independence. Large, vast, resourceful countries But, bar few exceptions, their independence was not our success story (keeping in mind too that Malta never colonised anybody - our country is just too tiny and fragile but a dear people, alas not all! more than make up for that). Rich origins or not, for religious reasons or not, many, too many want a piece of Europe. I wonder why? Europe, and indeed everywhere, to be sure, is apt to change. It has happened/evolved in the past, often bloodily. It will/has too, again. That is the natural order (if bloddy as I said). It's happening now. Some seem unruffled by this unfolding chain of events. Personally, I do not approve of the way it is happening. I do not approve of change by stealth. At the end of the day, Europe will change and I won't be here. I just don't want what I've loved and been enriched by, imperfect as it was at times, to change so. Gradual change is acceptable and normal. Anything more drastic is sinister. I'm European. And proud of it. And can't help it. That's all.
Joe Xuereb
Feb 11th 2010, 23:46
1) I've said this before but it bears repetition. Malta was colonized since forever. The last time by the British. Malta's resource, its only one, its strategic position/people. This is what I've always believed. The British gone, the strategic position went with them.. Malta was on its own, built a tourist industry and investment facilities with British knowhow. Facilitated by an British style education system and a common religion. Integration with our colonisers was considered but came to nought. Malta was on its own. And Malta made a go of things. Tourism/investment and willingness for honest work saw us through. We had not first hand knowledge of high mountains and mighty rivers. We used our imagination as decent people emerging not so long before from a devastating war that cost us everything and gave us nothing bar a cross and recognition. We felt no need to call conferences to proclaim that so-and-so's daughter/son down the road was reading at age two. No need. But we did produce stalwarts of world magnitude. Malta was independent and decent by its own effort. Tourism became our mainstay and grew. Until recently, when it had a setback. I wonder what went wrong?
cont./
Joe Xuereb
Feb 11th 2010, 19:12
3) This is a wily tactic but no more. Politicians are expert at it. But it is worthless because it is so transparent it's laughable).
I enjoy writing these, and other, comments. As pieces aiming to convince they are worthless (the hurdles are not so much high but cemented to the ground). But it is amazing how others' shallown ess inspires, formulates, and consolidates, one's thoughts, ready to be shot from the hip. So to speak. Much thanks.
Grima. What an interesting take! You don't know me other than what I write here and elsewhere. Yet you are not ashamed to make these sweeping accusations. Very telling if I may say so. Scrub that - I DO say so. For all you know I have done missionary work in five continents and speak severnteen African dialects including Maltese. But your imagination would not stretch to that I guess. With such paralytic paucity, I can only wish you luck. You, like many, sound fearful of your future and you are trying to shore up that fear somehow. As I said, I wish you luck. And projecting whatever it is you are about onto others won't help you any. That I promise.
Joe Xuereb
Feb 11th 2010, 18:58
2) I get the feeling that MANY Maltese are undergoing various levels of fear for their future. Some fear may be overblown, depending on personality. But fear, like stereotyping, is based on something and that something is there, visible and tangible. I would hazard that there are considerably more than the fingers I have on one hand of this sort of Maltese.
In the other camp I sense (and see/hear) the Maltese who are determined not to be stirred and shaken. That is up to them. But they do have their followers.
Malta is a Catholic country, steeped in dogmatic indoctrination. As in 'if you behave, nothing will happen to you' sort of thing, an attitude often, too often, an infantilism carried over into adulthood. They are trained to hope against hope that if they sit quietly and pray hard enough, somehow the bogey man will be gone when they wake up in the morning. A blanket term for this is what we call 'the tactic of denial' (most visible among those who tend to respond to an interlocutor by picking on what they deem to be a chink in his/her armour, a weak link).
cont./
Trevor Lorenzo Mizzi
Feb 11th 2010, 18:55
@ sean grima,
"in terms of maltese and international law, and you can do nothing about it."
We can elect a decent government that will stand up to the vatican/EU/UN and start to repatriate these illegal economic migrants, which is 98 % of them for starters.
Joe Xuereb
Feb 11th 2010, 18:47
1) I note some 'mistakes' in my previous comment. No problem. I speak/like I think/like I speak. Touch type. And submit. No deliberation, no consultation, what you see is what you get. No convolution. But experience a-plenty. That's it. Cogitation and experience. Proffers dignity and gravitas. And ensures against appearing stupid. And agenda-ridden. Look at this little wonder: http://www.ted.com/talks/chimamanda_adichie_the_danger_of_a_single_story.html
Self-congratulation of course has no limits with some ambitious people. That apart, 'one swallow does not a Summer make'. Let us say that, in this instance, this is a very good swallow. But damn my country on this one swallow (with respect to this swallow and countless other good ones)? So, I would be very naive to insist that if there is a good swallow, the rest must be similar siblings. Especially when I know - and admit, very important this - that many of the siblings swallows are migrating via, let's say, unusual flight-paths.
Now for some statistics. No, not ones that statisticians cook, but real ones. Social observers are good at this even from afar. Call it sixth sense.
cont./
I
sean grima
Feb 11th 2010, 18:01
joe xuereb: seeing that you left malta ages ago, you have no right to pontificate. it is said that travel helps to open the mind. if that is the case, your state is indeed sorry, seeing that you should have learnt, living in such a cosmopolitan city, to learn about other people before judging them.
Joe Xuereb
Feb 11th 2010, 17:43
2) It would be nice to think that some could make some effort to understand what they read (level of communication skills in Malta do not stand up to scrutiny, maybe?) Not my fault. Nothing to do with me. I left when I was just this high) Reassuring like, that Malta - my country going down the drain - may, perhaps, maybe, get on its feet. One day. With a little help from its own. But agendas - deliberate, misguided or merely sinister - can be tough hurdles to overcome I regret to say. And self-serving ignorance too. I almost self-serving ignorance.
I can understand why none of my pointers are picked upon. I cannot make things clearer. But these these, the inarticulate whichever way, have a ruse, a copout. 'You're entitled to your opinion' they say. And they walk away, refusing to engage. Because, really, they are incapable of real engagement. Sign of the times? General insecurities? I've seen it happening.
That's it. Sign of the times. That what it is.
Joe Xuereb
Feb 11th 2010, 17:33
1) The problem with debates between two kinds of debater, on the one hand a lateral-thinking, three-dimentional character PLUS EXPERIENCE (and living abroad only counts if one is intelligent enough to absorb - applies to any travel, touristy or residential) and the other an obdurately (agenda?) two-dimentional cardboard cutout - never the twain shall meet.
Mattew, London is a tough city, these days especially. People who are willing to give a decent day's work for a decent day's pay will survive. For this reason many drift and seek some sort of comfort in futile day-dreaming.
Judging by comments on treads such as this, I' wouldn't say that patriots are in the minority. A patriot is, by definition, somebody who gives a damn for his/her country. How could it be otherwise in the face of the current situation? Commonsensical to anyone able to see beyond two inches in front of their nose. Of course one can dream and hope that in the distant future, there will be a Maltese culture etc. for foreigners to inherit. What WHAT?! As likely as me flying to the Bahamas or to a safari in Kenya. Not my cup of tea as we say.
cont./
sean grima
Feb 11th 2010, 16:18
messrs mizzi and xuereb. you have a right to your opinion. you may quarrel all you want. fact remains that your opinion is shared by a small minority, and the law is what it is.
sean grima
Feb 11th 2010, 15:47
you can quarrel all you like, because the point is that these people are here legally, in terms of maltese and international law, and you can do nothing about it.
matthew tanti
Feb 11th 2010, 15:43
joe xuereb: "as long as there is at least one sample of whatever it is one is steretoyping then stereotyping is justified": stereotyping is never justified, precisely because one swallow never makes a summer.
btw, i have visited AND lived in london.
Trevor Lorenzo Mizzi
Feb 11th 2010, 15:33
@mathhew tanti,
You can say what you want, the point is that Turning Malta into an afro culture filled with africans or people of african descent like Jamaica, Haiti Nigeria , Ghana Somalia Eritrea etc( and BTW,I will quarrel with anyone who wants to sell my nation of birth).
is a step down as seen by the turmoil in those afro cultures. Go ahead , be my guest go live in Jamaica and we will see how long your white face will survive in Trenchtown Jamaica.
Joe Xuereb
Feb 11th 2010, 13:05
Mattew. quoting your so untypical good self: 'one might as well choose not to live in london!' - but visiting is OK it seems. Don't tell me you come all the way to stock up on cheap stuff from Petticoat Lane (if you'll pardon the stereotype, but there you are!)? Make up your mind for your own sake. Talking of stereotyples, as long as there is at least one sample of whatever it is one is steretoyping - stereotypes not usually materialising from limpid air - then stereotyping is justified. The stereotyper of course hopes that his reader is intelligent enough to read between the lines. It is as simple as that. Works like a charm. According to my mayor Boris Johnson.
I thought that homosexuals fighting off stereotypical images of themselves - which exist, see above - died the death yonks ago. But some people are stuck in the past. But that is there funeral, their outlook. What am I, a funeral director, looking out for clients? Hahahaha. You make me laugh.
Mattew, do you often call total strangers 'mate'? You must have eaten a lot of kirxa in your time.
matthew tanti
Feb 11th 2010, 12:22
1. thankfully you are away from malta. your comments are an insult to the country and its hospitable people.
2. since you are not the mayor of london, i will come and go to london as and when i please.
Joe Xuereb
Feb 11th 2010, 12:17
@ Mattew tal-Karabew. Mattew, is this all you can muster to defend your tarnished - as in bronzed - reputation by the, no, not alas the Jamaica sun, but the paler Maltese version. Have another rum (another stereotype, maybe). One must indeed not fall into the stereotyping trap. That said, I am hardly your typical anything. In Malta I would make few friends. But that is Malta's loss, Malta's funeral. How's the beach this morning Mattew? Lazing under a plastic palm-tree in a pot are you? Have another rum. And stop dreaming of London. You are not welcome. I do not pay taxes to feed the likes of you.
Go to Djerba dear. It's the nearest you'll ever get to Jamaica. And cheaper to get to. And the cous-cous ain't half good. Preferable to Cajun chicken any time.
simon.saliba
Feb 11th 2010, 12:04
Any clue on how many crime (and I mean all types of crimes including murdering) committed per hour in the USA? Is the USA a corrosive culture?
matthew tanti
Feb 11th 2010, 10:51
what a wonderful stereo typed image of jamaicans. same as with africans. quite strange coming from a homosexuals, given that homosexuals have rightly been battling for years against stereotyped prejudice in their regard!
Joe Xuereb
Feb 10th 2010, 19:19
2) That said, in Jamaica you could survive by borrowing or nicking or fasting (not really an option for a beach-bum idly peddling his bum on an empty stomach, ekeing out his days), stealing would be a serious crime. In London, because you are Maltese, a citizen of an EU member country, we will feed you for free, called Unemployment Benefit. If you still decide to top up your income illegally, there are prisons and fines). A sort of 'sunny Jamaica' in some countries would, of course, see your hand chopped off and other accoutrements too if you really misbehaved. So really, the choice is between Jamaica (and its ladies) and London. In Malta of course, if you misbehave you'll get the best deal of all - a suspended. And mama's minestrone when youre hungry. Methinks I see Mattew in comfy Malta for the foreseeable future. Maybe I'll see you when I get there if I can ever get away from this big freeze we're having. Ah! for a platt of mum's minestra to warm the cockles of my heart!
Moral of all this Mattew. Be careful what you wish for. It may come to pass.
Joe Xuereb
Feb 10th 2010, 19:14
1) @ Mattew (Tanti, I think). If you fancy Jamaica London can offer its food, music, colourful enclaves, the lot. And more if that's your scene. If you see what I mean. But not much sun. Hey! you can't have everything. Not forgetting of course, depending on your religiosity on any given day, the plentiful women, many v. beautiful, some available for one's money, or free, for one's Maltese charms (nudge! nudge!). I am assuming here that you are a hot-blooded Maltese heterosexual. No apologies if you are homosexual like me although I wouldn't have you anywhere near my club.
Jamaica. I can imagine you as a beach-bum in Jamaica. With all that London has to offer plus sun, sun and more sun of course. Jamaica wins hands down. But wait a minute. Man does not live by bread alone. He needs bread (food), bread (money) for bread (aka ganga) - if that's your scene. After so many hours bumming on a Jamaican beach, the stomach starts to rumble. In Jamaica they MAY have a S.S System but I doubt it would be as freely given as in London.
cont./
D Phillips
Feb 10th 2010, 18:40
"These apologists for the illegal invasion of european lands by corrosive cultures, are all tools of the New World Order."
"turn Malta into a Jamaica with its afro culture of 5 murders per week, that is corrosive!"
Do me a favour!
sean grima
Feb 10th 2010, 17:17
I think that everyone should watch this inspiring and educational video which puts prejudice firmly in perspective:
http://www.ted.com/talks/chimamanda_adichie_the_danger_of_a_single_story.html
Joe Xuereb
Feb 10th 2010, 17:07
@ Matthew Tanti. You disappoint me. By 'hot' I meant anything that one finds unpleasant. If I meant it literally, I would have continued by saying, 'why would they come to a COLD country?'. But I didn't because in this instance, hot means uncomfortable whatever. Read it again and you will see what I mean. In fact I'll do it for you and quote myself to save you the trouble of having to stretch you brain unduly. Please try more to comprehend what you read (you're not alone in this so I'll forgive you - are you there Sean Grima?). I will not call you 'unbelieveably stupid' seeing that English is not, after all, your first language. But then nor is it mine. Hurry along now. And watch your step. And do not forget, we are not the depository of any of the planet's unfortunates - not I, not you, not Sean (the Maltese guy with the un-Christian name - a misfortune often self-inflicted as is obvious to any agenda-less realist. And nothing to do with numbers either. One or two would rock Malta's rickety boat (ironic that).
matthew tanti
Feb 10th 2010, 16:46
ma kulhadd jaqbad dan mizzi, whether it is africans or jamaicans....hey, i wouldn't mind living in jamaica mate :) well, seriously one might as well choose not to live in london!
simon.saliba
Feb 10th 2010, 16:02
What if St.Paul were to arrive today to Malta?
Most probably St. Paul would be heavily fined and quite possibly jailed if he set foot in Europe these days with his support for slavery!
Reading the comments one may come to believe that the European culture and Christianity are the monopoly of civilization and the beacon for mankind. Ironically, we often forget that Christianity along with Judaism and Islam were born in the Middle East and were occasionally imported to Europe as one coin. The very simple fact that Christianity was born in the Middle East by default aggrandize this region of the globe.
To all those who forget I would like to ask, have they ever had a 20th or 21st century conversation? Do they really know their own history or where they originated from?
The Times of Malta
Thursday, 25th June 2009
Friday 12 June 2009
The first Europeans were cannibals, say Spanish archaeologists
By.Virginie Grognou, AFP
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20090625/world-news/the-first-europeans-were-cannibals-say-spanish-archaeologists
Trevor Lorenzo Mizzi
Feb 10th 2010, 15:51
@ mathhew tanti, Blasphemy is neither here or there, if you are an atheist it is meaningless. Now, you wanting to turn Malta into a Jamaica with its afro culture of 5 murders per week, that is corrosive!
matthew tanti
Feb 10th 2010, 10:28
one of you mentioned "corrosive" cultures. i wonder how superior you people think our culture is. you demonstrate a lack of knowledge about african culture which leads to your prejudice. precisely which aspect of maltese culture is so superior? blasphemy?
lgalea
Feb 10th 2010, 10:14
Francis Bellizzi
Agree with you.
And the eu is targeting Malta specifically as was stated by Franco Frattini who said that he wanted Malta and Cyprus to be illegal immigrants open centres. This is another negative aspect of eu membership.
joe camenzuli
Feb 9th 2010, 17:19
The problem is that we the tax payer had to foot the bill for this court case. No wonder! Is it the reason why I haven't received my tax rebate yet?
Francis Bellizzi
Feb 9th 2010, 16:57
The more I read about illegal immigrants being returned to Malta from other countries in the EU the more I start to believe in conspiracy theories. I believe the only reason the EU accepted Malta as a member was to use it as a detention centre for illegals. After all it`s easier to have as many illegals in one place than spread all over the EU. I agree wholeheartedly with S Koludrovic.
T.gauci
Feb 9th 2010, 16:55
Europe can deport them back to our country but we can't deport them back to Libya. that's nice!
Charles Sammut
Feb 9th 2010, 16:46
@ Ron Saliba
Most African nations have enjoyed independence longer than Malta has. Most of them have some form of democracy, so the people choose who governs.
Even if there were teething troubles, and of course there were, after a couple of generations it should have been ironed out. In any case importing Africa's problems to Europe is going to make two unstable continents.
Africa is going through a painful process, but this is necessary for it to find its feet. Europe was in a similar state as well. For centuries, European countries were constantly at war with each other and famines and pestilence were the order of the day.
It is unfortunately a necessary phase, but it will be better in the end. Look at Angola, after so much bloodshed, it is now finding its feet and prospering. The West must let this natural process run its course otherwise it will never end.
However well intentioned, the do-gooders are not helping in this natural healing process.
s.koludrovic
Feb 9th 2010, 16:37
Ours is not to reason why,ours is to obey and shut up. So says the EU
Ron Saliba
Feb 9th 2010, 16:31
The main problem of all this is that in the Past ALL Africa was colonies of european countries. When these were granted independence, the former colonies gave control of the countries to whoever they deemed fit, which of course is the reason why Africa is in such a sorry state.
Now, unfortunately no one in europe mentions this (the main culprits being france,belgium, uk), and people with no knowledge blame the immigrants, when in fact they should be blaming the the other european countries who created this mess in the beginning.
Muscat D
Feb 9th 2010, 16:18
Sean grima
@john micallef
1. on what basis do you assume he could have flown from his country - we do not even know which it is?
---------------
Even somalia has scheduled flights out of the country and internal flights to major cities in somalia itself. don't you think that if a failed state has scheduled flights out of the country others would have too?
Trevor Lorenzo Mizzi
Feb 9th 2010, 16:13
@Charles Sammut,
I agree with what you said 100%
These apologists for the illegal invasion of european lands by corrosive cultures, are all tools of the New World Order.
Charles Sammut
Feb 9th 2010, 15:56
@ matthew tanti
"millions continue to die as a result of war, malnutrition and disease."
In spite of the billions of dollars in aid which they receive. In spite of the widespread vaccination programs (more Western oppression). Because of endemic corruption and incompetence. Because they have murdered or expelled white farmers who had cultivated the soil and provided food for millions (western colonisation).
You only have to look at Rhodesia - Zimbabwe to see what they are capable of.
No thanks, we don't want these people here. We are doing them a dis-service allowing them to stay. They have to learn to fend for themselves because the do-gooders have reduced the African to the state of the eternal beggar.
Charles Sammut
Feb 9th 2010, 15:47
@ sean grima
The lifeboat is already dangerously overloaded.
We cannot and do not want any more illegal immigrants. No matter what so called international law or Opus Dei say, we will not destroy our social fabric to accommodate those who have a huge, rich continent where to stay. We have a right to protect ourselves from this invasion.
And, it is by now clear to those who have imposed themselves on us, that they are not welcome and should take the same route they took coming here.
lgalea
Feb 9th 2010, 15:43
sean grima
Again disgusting how you try to excuse everything done by ILLEGAL immigrants including the breach of all laws instead of defending your own country and brethren from the massive illegal immigrants invasion sean. How about stopping from encouraging them by telling them how to get round obstacles and the law when they come to Malta on your immigration website sean?
As for flying from his own country it is none of our business whether there are flights from his country to Europe or not. What interests us is that he should NOT be here and that he should be expelled back to his own country or Libya from where he came sean.
As for the media reporting these facts, are you now insinuating that the media should not report these facts because they happen to be illegal immigrants?
Trevor Lorenzo Mizzi
Feb 9th 2010, 15:33
@ sean grima,
It seems that a high percentage of your buddy sub saharans are criminal to the core.
Keep defending them sean, it will be a never ending chore.
matthew tanti
Feb 9th 2010, 15:28
joe xuereb's comments are unbelieveably egositic and simplitic! man, do you really think they are leaving because it is hot? the "i'm ok jack, i could not care less about the rest" attitude he adopts is precisely the reason why millions continue to die as a result of war, malnutrition and disease.
sean grima
Feb 9th 2010, 15:23
@john micallef
1. on what basis do you assume he could have flown from his country - we do not even know which it is?
2. the magistrate applies the punishment according to his discretion, on a case by case
basis. of course, he would know more about the law than the people commenting here!
unfortunately, it seems that there seems to be a penchant for reporting every one of these cases, which is giving an exaggerated impression of the number of immigrants.
john micallef
Feb 9th 2010, 15:11
it is becomming common practice that these 'unwanted illegals' use the phrase 'very sorry for committing the crime'. he said he did this to visit relatives in mainland europe.
1 if he wanted to visit relatives he could have taken a flight from his country to anywhere in europe
2 he used to work with a local company, is he illegal or legal in malta?
3 why was he jailed 'the minimum required by law'?
sean grima
Feb 9th 2010, 15:02
i am sure that by now everyone is aware that the fact that one enters a country without a visa does not necessarily imply s/he is illegal staying there. the reason is that the interest of protecting refugees or people in need of humanitarian protection eclipses the requirement for a piece of paper!
Joe Xuereb
Feb 9th 2010, 14:57
I do not know this guy's country of origin. So I cannot assume that he is an illegal immigrant or not. That is not up to me to decide. That he claims to be visiting relatives in mainland Europe - well, that is as good an excuse as any. Unfortunatly, the situation is now such that Malta, and countries all over, are now bound by international obligations. If these were not in place, and he was an illegal itinerant, it would be a simple case of throwing him out plus his relatives if they really exist. It could be doing him and his country of origin a favour believe me. Why is everybody wanting to leave their country because it is hot? Surely it cannot be more uncomfortable than being in Europe with no rights to one's name, other than some dubious internation obligation. No way to live. What am I supposed to do? Bleed my guts over anyone who decides to want to live with me in Europe? What am I, humanity's saviour? humanity's depository?
louise vella
Feb 9th 2010, 14:56
So Mr Belo Akilu used to work at the Hilton as a house-keeping assistant. Can those who keep saying that illegal immigrants do only the jobs that the Maltese do not accept affirm that no Maltese would like to work as a house-keeping assistant at the Hilton?
Muscat. Pat
Feb 9th 2010, 14:30
Kemm ihobbuh il-proxmu l-Ewropej; qalbhom perzuta sakemm dawn l-imsieken ikunu f'dar haddiehor u mhux taghhom! Nispera li l-agenzija tal-Gnuz Maghquada ghall-Immigrazzjoni tipprotesta ma EU; jew dawn jipprotestaw mall-pajjizi iz-zghar biss?
s.koludrovic
Feb 9th 2010, 14:23
It seems that by joining the EU Malta is fast becoming a detention centre for all the African immigrants that the EU does not want.
The words human rights and freedom of movment are just empty words only to be imposed on others.
Chris Mifsud
Feb 9th 2010, 14:16
"his intention was never to land in Malta but to visit relatives on mainland Europe."
It may have been his intention but not all intentions are legal and intending to enter a country illegaly without a visa or documents is most definetely not legal.
This individual should be deported back to his home country.
lgalea
Feb 9th 2010, 13:43
This is the solidarity of those who expect us to keep the illegal immigrants here.
Why don't they put their money where their mouth is and keep them there?
Why don't they give us an example of solidarity in the eu capital?
Charles Sammut
Feb 9th 2010, 13:32
He should have gone to the UNHCR or the JRS in Belgium and applied for asylum because he was unhappy in Malta and his human rights were being broken. You know, the potatoes are too white and they don't give you enough sauce with your chicken.
Keith D'Amato
Feb 9th 2010, 13:05
It seems that when something involves Illegal Immigrants the following are always used: "Granted ..., Minimun, Free, Granted Bail, Awarded, Freedom" .........