Divorce should be in Labour’s manifesto –MP
The position that the Labour Party should include divorce in its manifesto rather than leave it up to the leader to personally push the issue is gaining ground, with a senior MP being the latest to voice his agreement.
Speaking during the television discussion programme Bondiplus on Monday, Labour MP Evarist Bartolo said he expected the party to go to the polls with a clear proposal to introduce divorce if elected to government.
His declaration contrasts with the pledge made by Labour leader Joseph Muscat to personally table a divorce Bill and give a free vote to his parliamentary group if the party was elected to government in the next election.
Dr Muscat’s position means the introduction of divorce would depend on his personal commitment rather than the party’s.
When asked whether he agreed with Mr Bartolo’s stand, a spokesman for Dr Muscat said the leader’s position “remained unchanged”.
However, he added, Dr Muscat “positively viewed” the fact there was an internal open debate within the party.
“Dr Muscat is following this debate closely. All views expressed freely within the party are being given due consideration,” the spokesman said, criticising the Prime Minister and “his coterie” for “unilaterally” deciding the Nationalist Party will stand on an anti-divorce platform.
“This is not surprising given that 12 years have passed since the PN promised to recognise the rights and obligations of cohabiting couples but nothing has happened. These families continue to suffer,” the Labour spokesman said.
On Bondiplus, Mr Bartolo was reacting to a question by the programme host on how it was possible to reconcile the anti-divorce position of some Labour MPs with the pro-divorce views of others.
Mr Bartolo replied that prospective Labour candidates would know what the party was proposing in its manifesto before deciding to contest on its behalf, adding he expected divorce to be included in the manifesto.
Mr Bartolo’s statement was not unique because it followed a motion approved during the PL’s youth forum annual conference in December urging the party to include divorce in its electoral programme.
Labour youth forum president Daniel Micallef had said that gone were the days when the party remained a step back from saying what it truly believed.
“As a progressive party, one of the crucial issues for us is civil rights. In a country that has been part of the EU for five years, we can no longer have a situation where, when discussion arises on certain rights, such issues are sidelined, swept under the carpet or gagged by the conservative authorities,” Mr Micallef had said.
3 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Joe Zammit
Feb 11th 2011, 16:20
BORG IN-NADUR: 17 ta' Novembru, 2010:
Uliedi, illejla tajtkom prova ċara. Iva wliedi, għalhekk Ibni Ġesù qed jibgħatni hawn, fuq dil-gżira. Għalhekk għażilt dil-familja kważi ħames snin ilu. Għalhekk ridt lil Angelik u lil Catherine. Iva wliedi, Ibni Ġesù ma riedx jara żwieġ imfarrak. Għalhekk ħames snin ilu bagħatni hawnhekk, nerġa’ ngħidilkom. Ġejt inħabbrilkom minn qabel x’se jseħħ fuq dil-gżira. Kien hawn min fehemni u oħrajn lanqas biss taw widen.
Ftit taż-żmien ieħor se jkollkom għażla f’idejkom intom stess. Oqogħdu attenti x’tagħżlu wliedi. Iġġibux il-gwaj fuqkom.
Fejnhom fil-familji l-imħabba, l-għaqda, il-maħfra, is-sinċerità u t-talb flimkien? Fejnhom? Għalhekk illum kulħadd qed ifarfar minn fuq spallejh mal-ewwel intopp li jinqala’.
Iva wliedi, il-qalb tiegħi u l-qalb ta’ Ibni Ġesù muġugħin minħabba fikom. Jiena muġugħa għax jiena omm li nħoss għalikom.
Akkost ta’ kollox uliedi, jiġri x’jiġri, ibqgħu għidu: “LE GHAD-DIVORZJU, LE GHAD-DIVORZJU!"
U għidu r-rużarju u ġiegħlu lil ħaddieħor jgħid ir-rużarju.
Grazzi talli smajtu s-sejħa tiegħi.
John Smith
Feb 4th 2010, 22:53
If this party intends to put divorce into its manifest for the next general election, you can be assured that I have meet many who told me that if this would be on the manifest they won't be voting to new Labour, but would be ready to give their vote to gonzi-PN.
This means that if the Labour Party intends to use this to get some votes, be sure that he would loose double if not more from prospective voters who where of the opinion to vote labour. Therefore, this is a point that can work to some, but misfires into one's face. I do suggest not to use this as a vote catcher, as it would 100% works against the Labour Party.
Lino Apap
Feb 4th 2010, 02:25
About time some politicians showed some guts to tackle this issue and finally taking into Caesar's realm what is Caesar's. I wonder if Joseph Muscat will show the same gumption though. Although you are not usually my cup of tea, well done Mr. Bartolo.