
Sunday, 24th January 2010
Sea Shepherd heading to the Mediterranean to protect tuna
Crew of the Japanese ship Shonan Maru No. 2 sprays water at the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society's high-tech powerboat Ady Gil during a collision between the two vessels in the Southern Ocean. (Reuters)
The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society will not be getting much rest after the Japanese whaling season as it announced it is heading to the Mediterranean to oppose the illegal operations of Bluefin tuna poachers.
Both Sea Shepherd ships, the Steve Irwin and the Bob Barker, will head for the Mediterranean from the Southern Ocean. The organisation said this is a crucial year in the battle to save the species, adding that it will not cave in to threats and violence from the fishermen.
The organisation has a long-standing campaign against Japanese whaling, a saga at the centre of Animal Planet's Whale Wars series.
Announcing their venture into the Mediterranean, the organisation's founder and president, Captain Paul Watson, said: "We need to bring to the attention of the international public that one of the most unique fish species in the world, the Bluefin tuna, is on the brink of extinction due to the illegal fisheries driven by Japan's insatiable demand for this expensive fish."
Two weeks ago a single Bluefin tuna sold to Japan fetched $177,000 (€125,230). As the fish becomes rarer, the prices paid for it will become higher.
"This is the economics and politics of extinction," the organisation said, insisting that corruption, and the rising market value of the Bluefin was preventing any real conservation efforts.
The Sea Shepherd said its campaigns against Japanese whalers equipped it with the experience and resolve to tackle the violence of poachers. "We may lose a ship, but the loss of a ship is preferable to the loss of the Bluefin as a species. Ships are expendable, species are not," Captain Watson said.
While it is unlikely the group will come into contact with Maltese vessels, any success for the organisation will affect local trade. While Malta's fleet is small compared with other Mediterranean countries, thousands of tuna are brought to Malta in cages by foreign fishermen to be fattened and exported.
Last year, Malta exported €86.3 million worth of Bluefin tuna in 11 months, according to figures released in Parliament. A report produced by the Federation of Maltese Aquaculture Producers (FMAP) states that the industry has doubled its turnover over the two-year period to 2007. Tuna is now the third most exported commodity, according to the federation.
Last September, the European Commission recommended that the EU should support a temporary suspension of the global trade of Bluefin tuna.
But the recommended ban was shot down by Greece, Cyprus, Malta, Spain, France and Italy - all countries with a stake in the trade.
Conservationists are now hoping for a better result at the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (Cites) to be held in March. The EU has to take a common position on whether Bluefin tuna should be included on an international list of hundreds of endangered species that require protection.
But the EU's stand is not yet clear because Stavros Dimas, the environment commissioner who favours a temporary ban, is at loggerheads with Joe Borg, the fisheries commissioner, who opposes it.
Last Tuesday, Malta came under fire in the London Times, which said Dr Borg was protecting the country's interest to the detriment of the species.
Dr Borg believes new measures introduced last November are enough to protect the species, a view not shared by the Greek Commissioner. Neither of the commissioners has signalled any willingness to compromise and, so far, the Commission's president, José Manuel Barroso, has preferred to leave the two commissioners to sort it out between themselves.








RSS
Comments
This was also referred to in a letter to the US President by the Deputy Secretary of State in which he also mentioned Korea as engaging in large-scale driftnet fishing.(Leich Marian Nash, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law by Deputy Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger, dated 13 May, 1991, AmericanJournal of InternationalLaw, Vol85 1991 p668-671.
Australia also expressed its disappointment that Japan and Taiwan did not consider an immediate ban on driftnet fishing in the south Pacific. (Answer to a question in the Australian Senate by the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, 24.05.1990, Senate Debates 1989 Vol 139 p955-6, Australian Yearbook of International Law Vol 13 1991 p283
Australia also included Korea. (Joint press release by the Minister for Foreign affairs and Trade and Minister for Primary Industries and Energy, 28.11.1991 in Australian Yearbook of International Law Vol 13 1991 p284-286. There were also the Castries Declaration and Wellington Convention on driftnet fishing. Spain is also a great destroyer.
I do not condone the raping of the seas to hasten the demise of Euro Med countries. My issue with the quoted material from Mr Watson is that before he has even begun a campaign, he is predicting the loss of one of his ships. Not only that, but he deems it to be an acceptable loss if tuna are saved. One has but to look at the history of his Southern Ocean campaigns to see how this will turn out. Before his current Antarctic campaign, he said that a collision was inevetable. Well, it certainly came to pass didn't it? The man goes into areas where he has no jurisdiction or authority in hopes of creating international incidents to force governments into action.
I commend Sea Shepherd for taking an interest in protecting a threatened species. It is a refreshing change from his Antarctic effort to protect a species, minke whale, that is neither threatened nor endangered. My issue with them is that they appear to intend to bring their violent tactics to the Med. Maybe they could clean up the problems with southern blue fin tuna in their home waters surrounding Australia first.
Have you ever wondered why Sea Shepherd doesn't do direct action in Canada, Costa Rica, Mexico, South Africa, Iceland and Norway anymore? Why doesn't Watson stop the JARPN research program? Here's why:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUIaB76NBIg
St-Pierre fishermen chase anti-sealing ship from harbour
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2008/04/04/stpierre-watson.html
At a later date Canada confiscated the SSCS vessel Farley Mowat arrested the crew for interfering with their annual state sanctioned seal hunt. Canada later sold the Mowat for unpaid berthing fees. Canada did what most states do when you refuse to retrieve your property they gave written notice of their intent and followed through. This is like having your car towed and then refusing to retrieve it because you thought the cops were wrong. The state will just serve you notice and sell your vehicle at auction to cover their costs. Let's hope Malta shows the SSCS the same hospitality St-Pierre did.
I suggest he stays home too. He will quicken the demise of the euro med countries once they have finished raping the sea. Just watch end of the line - malta is shown in the documentary.
So, what with major water scarcity issues, depleting aquifers, climate change, crop failure, more brackish water, over fishing, very expensive oil coming to an island like Malta, keep on fishing!
Paul Watson bases his ships out of Australia. The Southern bluefin tuna needs protecting and Australia catches 42% of the total world quota, most of which they export to other markets. I suggest that Sea Shepherd save fuel, stay home, and clean up your own backyard before bringing aggressive violence to the Mediterranean.