Ramblers urge Mepa to stop Baħrija works
The works taking place on the contentious site in Baħrija. Photo: Matthew Mirabelli
Environmentalists have upped the ante in their quest to stop ongoing works to rebuild a Baħrija farmhouse owned by former Nationalist Party president Victor Scerri, insisting they are not satisfied with the planning authority's handling of the matter.
The Rambler's Association has written to Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi, Rural Affairs Minister George Pullicino and to the chairman of the Malta Environment and Planning Authority, asking them to put a stop to the works.
Late last year, the association had asked Mepa to stop ongoing "abusive works" on the site after a permit for an extension of the farmhouse was withdrawn in August.
At the time, the association had filed an objection with Mepa saying "heavy equipment was back on site with uncontrolled works perpetrating the ruination of the valley".
The reason for the withdrawal of the extension permit was that an environment screening process had been ignored. However, the original building permit remains valid because it was granted before the screening process was introduced.
Work on the controversial site started again in November after Mepa gave its go-ahead to the method restoration statement supplied by Dr Scerri's architect.
The development had sparked controversy before the European Parliament elections last June and subsequently led to Dr Scerri's resignation. He had insisted he wanted to defend his case as a private citizen without dragging the party into the controversy.
In its letter, the association said Mepa had not addressed all the points it raised back in December, insisting other answers were unsatisfactory.
It requested that works be stopped on grounds of a commitment Mr Pullicino gave in 2005 when he was responsible for Mepa.
The ramblers accused Mr Pullicino of misguiding people and civil society when in an article published in The Times on June 4, 2005 he said: "I am confident the planning system is sufficiently robust to provide important countryside areas such as Baħrija and Fomm ir-Riħ adequate protection from insensitive development."
The association said that at the time of the above declaration, three applications filed by the same person had already been approved in Baħrija, which meant the minister never sought information from Mepa or was given incorrect information. Alternatively, they added, Mr Pullicino was knowingly concealing the applications and thereby making a false declaration.
On these grounds, the association called for the revocation of all permits issued in the Baħrija area before June 4, 2005.
The charges were rebutted by the ministry, which, in turn, accused the association of distorting the truth.
The minister, it said, had been referring to the development of a five-star resort and golf course among other developments that were supposed to be built in Baħrija. Mr Pullicino never spoke on the proposals the association was addressing.
7 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
a attard
Jan 12th 2010, 09:31
When one considers that a third of the Maltese Islands are under some form of construction (not considering the amount of tarmac cover and quarries!) few remaining gems such as those of Bahrija (Oasies in Arabic) Valley, Mistra Valley and other few remaining areas would have been treated with great respect, care and protection and any development would have only be in relation to compliment its natural environment (especially since it holds a type of crab that is only to be found in the Maltese Islands) or for educational purposes.
Jon Vercellono
Jan 12th 2010, 08:54
@ c. camilleri - Principles stand for something given (even your's); but don't impugn someone else's either. The Ramblers have principles as well; expand your mind and look at all the pieces in a big picture concerning this PARTICULAR scenario.
P.Cassar
Jan 11th 2010, 18:21
SHAME SHAME SHAME What astonished me is that the Prime Minister keeps a straight face when he talks about the environment.
Corey Attard
Jan 11th 2010, 16:51
When you in power you could do whatever they want .
c. camilleri
Jan 11th 2010, 16:14
The go ahead for work to begin has been authorised by Mepa and we heard the Chairman say on our TV that there is nothing illegal. So pls stop this persecution and try passing the time in something that make more sense. You ramblers have never said anything about the two stop notices served to the labour candidate. Or is a trip to Gozo too much of a fatigue to old pensioners.
Joe Azzopardi
Jan 11th 2010, 15:52
The planning system will never be “sufficiently robust” until a political will that allows it to administer itself through its professionals is made manifests, and until its enforcement arm is shaken out of its lethargy and made to act in the common interest. That is what the MEPA reform should achieve. But sadly these issues seems to be at the very bottom of the reform agenda.
J.Bonnici
Jan 11th 2010, 15:41
When the Nationalists lose the next election they will commission a report to identify reasons for the defeat and topping the list would be Victor Scerri's Bahrija case.