PBS airtime given to Siġġiewi home 'was against the law'
Dar tal-Providenza, the Siġġiewi Church home for people with disability, raised a record €617,585 on New Year's Day but the annual fund-raiser should not have been given airtime on state TV, according to the regulator of the voluntary sector.
"This clearly went contrary to the law," the Commissioner for Voluntary Organisations, Kenneth Wain said.
This is the second organisation to have come into Prof. Wain's line of fire.
Last week, he criticised the Malta Community Chest Fund, which organised L-Istrina, for not enrolling as a voluntary organisation before the Boxing Day charity event, despite his repeated appeals.
Prof. Wain has threatened to resign over the matter if his office is further undermined.
The dispute arose because a number of organisations - including those run by the Church and the MCCF, chaired by the President of the Republic - opted not to enrol as an NGO under the Voluntary Organisations Act.
Enrolling as an NGO is not compulsory but it makes registered organisations eligible for state benefits and grants, including, for example, free airtime on the state broadcaster, PBS.
Prof. Wain said that while the MCCF was granted a concession by the Social Policy Minister to organise L-Istrina, the organisers of Dar tal-Providenza had no such dispensation.
It was therefore unfair and technically illegal for PBS to grant free hours of airtime to the charity marathon, which was mostly aired on private stations Net TV, One TV and Favourite Channel but had some hours of airtime on PBS too.
The home's director, Fr Martin Micallef, said the Curia was discussing the issue with the Office of the Prime Minister and the commissioner's legal adviser. This was confirmed by a Curia spokesman.
Fr Micallef said that as Dar tal-Providenza always did, it had applied for the required police permit.
Prof. Wain said a police permit had nothing to do with the issue at hand. "A police permit simply enables you to collect money. It does not qualify you for state benefits, which includes airtime on PBS. That is what the law says," he insisted.
His argument is that such preferential treatment makes it unfair on the 350 other organisations that have enrolled and it also renders the law, and his role, redundant.
PBS chairman Clare Thake Vassallo said she was "comfortable" with the police permit.
"PBS has been instrumental in helping organisations raise the public money they need and will continue to carry out the public service as far as we can," she said.
Neither the Curia nor the MCCF have yet explained what is hindering them from enrolling as NGOs.
The MCCF said it did not need to enrol and had advice from the Attorney General, the state's legal adviser, on the matter. When asked for a copy of such written advice, a spokesman for the MCCF refused.
Lawyer Max Ganado, who drafted the 2007 law to regulate the voluntary sector, has said that although the MCCF published its accounts, it should go a step further and make use of the system in the law to lead by example.
The Attorney General has not yet replied to questions for his advice to better explain his advice in terms of the law.
Last year, similar problems arose when PBS was in charge of distributing the funds of L-Istrina. Several selected beneficiaries were not enrolled with the NGOs Commissioner, namely those run by the Curia.
Prof. Wain said that "as far as I know" all beneficiaries that ended up receiving funds were made to enrol before getting the money and in some cases this was done at the very last minute.
However, since the law was still very new, the MCCF was not forced to enrol at the time.
9 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Joe Azzopardi
Jan 7th 2010, 08:39
With so may issues needing to be addressed in the voluntary sector did Prof. Wain really need to pick on this? Besides the usual resignation threat is pathetic!!
Carmel J. Caruana
Jan 6th 2010, 18:25
Dear Prof Wain please do NOT resign!
It is a good thing that you are pointing out certain issues. If you do resign they will just put somebody else whose only qualification would be an ability to keep his/her mouth shut!!!
The law is for everyone to respect. Just hang in there and keep the public informed. The Malta Community Chest Fund and Church should set an example.
Joe Tabone-Adami
Jan 6th 2010, 15:46
It is amazing how some persons make demi-gods out of themselves, given half a chance, when wielding 'power' of sorts!
Let us all give thanks to Providence who, through the foresight and efforts of that holy priest Mgr Michael Azzopardi, affords a decent, loving and caring livelihood to some of our disabled brethren. Ask any family whose members have benefitted from the good work at Dar tal-Providenza during the last four decades.
As for the Malta Community Chest Fund, ask any charitable organization - particularly if run by the Church - about the benefits received, year in year out, through the Fund.
Ramon Casha
Jan 6th 2010, 12:00
This is a typical case of much ado about nothing.
louise vella
Jan 6th 2010, 10:50
The MCCF’s audited accounts are accessible on:
http://www.maltacommunitychestfund.org/mccf/Pages/Accounts.aspx.
I’m not expert so I invite commentators to see if I’m right or wrong. The accounts for the year ended March 2008 say 13 organisations received up to €1000, 10 received €5000 each, and 2 more than €5000 each. The organisations are not identified. This is unsatisfactory. Maybe they should be identified.
The accounts for the year ended March 2009 say Individuals and entities together received about €900 000. The individuals are not identified and this is reasonable. Neither are the entities: I think this is unreasonable, they should each be identified with the sum given to each one of them.
C Sullivan
Jan 6th 2010, 10:25
I have been following this controversial issue and agree 100% with Prof Wain. Nobody is above the law and preferential treatment should be a thing of the past. There are many organisations in need of funds and it is unfair on organisations that do not carry as much clout, to be marginalised in such ways. We are arriving at a point once again, where the big win. Instead of formulating a co-operative structure, we are creating a competitive one.
D Vella
Jan 6th 2010, 10:12
Once again Prof Wain is right. Either we have a law which is equal with all or we have a free for all, as is the case now which is open to abuse in many cases .
I look forward to all these charities publishing audited accounts sans creative accounting.
Galea. L
Jan 6th 2010, 10:11
So should PBS not grant free air time to charities and simply present rubbish programmes to the viewers?
louise vella
Jan 6th 2010, 10:04
So we made a new law with a lot of fanfare and we thought it would introduce legality, transparency, accountability - in brief, a bit of order - into a disorderly system that had existed for ages. Now we find that the Curia was not keen to abide by the law, because the absence of the law had never prevented the Church from collecting money, often without transparency and without giving an account for it. The President thinks it is only a whim that his MCCF should abide by the law. Maybe the government should just scrap the law and we go on without it as we did before.