No explanation for U-turn on swine flu victim report
The health authorities are refusing to disclose what led them to issue an incorrect statement that a 32-year-old swine flu victim suffered from a condition that may have aggravated chest infections.
When contacted yesterday healthcare director general Ray Busuttil said: "We had information and due to our promise (to inform the public) we passed it on. After some time, more information came through that changed the position we had transmitted initially and we passed it on correctly. That was the situation - no more, no less. I have no further comments to make on the case.
"I am not hiding anything but protecting the confidentiality of the patient. It's easier for me to say what the exact case was but I'm bound by respect for the patient," he said.
Last Monday, the health authorities issued a statement through the Department of Information informing the public that Justin Chircop died of "complications from the A H1N1 (Swine Flu) virus". The department added that the victim suffered from a condition that could exacerbate chest infections.
But last Thursday the health authorities issued a second statement, seemingly contradicting the one circulated by the DOI.
Following an autopsy it emerged that Mr Chircop, the fourth person to die of swine flu in Malta, had no other illnesses and had succumbed to a severe attack of swine flu.
This meant that Mr Chircop, a popular radio deejay, was the first Maltese swine flu fatality not to have been in the "vulnerable group" because the other three all had underlying conditions that could aggravate the illness.
When contacted, Dr Busuttil said the health authorities had never said Mr Chircop had one of the conditions that would have put him in the vulnerable group - which include the elderly, pregnant women and children under five.
"He was never one of the people who fell within the vulnerable group... Our message is that the case of Justin Chircop shows that the influenza can impact people who are not in this group. This is not just in Malta but across the world and, as health authorities, we were expecting that we'd have such a death," he said.
He said Mr Chircop's death did not mean that swine flu had become more dangerous. The health authorities had always said that healthy individuals were also at risk. Worldwide, between 20 and 50 per cent of swine flu victims were perfectly healthy before they died.
Dr Busuttil added that complications due to swine flu could arise for several reasons. People could get a bad bout of the infection or develop more symptoms.
He urged people to follow the advice given by the health authorities to take the swine flu vaccine, stay indoors if they had flu-like symptoms and stay in touch with their doctor if symptoms persisted.
4 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Christian Sciberras
Jan 4th 2010, 09:52
Miguel Micallef - The vaccine is backed up by international parties, as long as it ain't "Made in Malta" it should be safe enough.
That said, (as usual) there's a lot of bad information out there. As I said in a previous article, the WHO and CDC are several months short of disease statistics.
Are the health authorities actually informing anyone *relevant* about the current situation. Sure, common citizens do not need the details of this disease, but the experts in this war, are they being notified?
Speaking of the ever-wise Maltese, "bniedem avzat nofsu armat".
Miguel Micallef
Jan 3rd 2010, 16:48
If there's anyone who's trying to influence others on what they should or should not do it's the authorities, not me. And clearly, they are lying about it. If you want to blindly trust the authorities that's up to you, but I feel it my duty to point out the authorities' failure in these critical issues. This is not a joke, they are totally in the black about a dead person.
Joe Zammit
Jan 3rd 2010, 15:07
I don't see your point, because clearly you don't have one. If you don't want to take the vaccine, then don't. But don't try to influence other people in not taking it.
Miguel Micallef
Jan 3rd 2010, 11:01
How can I "follow the advice given by the health authorities to take the swine flu vaccine" when "The health authorities are refusing to disclose what led them to issue an incorrect statement" about it?