• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Climate

Chilly reactions to a heated climate summit

'A flimsy declaration'

Protestors at the UN Climate Change conference in Copenhagen yesterday. Photo: PA

While the United Nations recognised an accord on climate change between a US-led group of five nations in Copenhagen as "an essential beginning", local voices merged with those of other countries in expressing their frustration.

The failure of global leaders to reach an ambitious and legally binding agreement during the climate summit raises pressing concerns for Malta.

As a small island state, the country faces multiple threats, the major one being rising sea levels that will affect low-lying residential areas, flood beaches, affect the country's ports and tourism facilities and seep into the water table, devastating agriculture.

Resources Minister George Pullicino said the summit was almost a total failure: "The so-called Copenhagen accord falls considerably short of EU expectations.

It neither provides binding emission targets for US, China and other emerging economies such as India and Brazil, nor does it provide a comprehensive package of financial aid for adaptation by the most vulnerable countries."

Labour Party spokesperson on climate change Leo Brincat said the deal is striking only for what it left out.

"It was evident from the beginning that there would be no legally binding document at the end of the Copenhagen summit, but no one expected a document that fell so far short of expectations," he said.

On Friday evening, the US, China, Brazil, India and South Africa - the biggest emitters of greenhouse gas emissions - reached a last-minute agreement. Most other delegations had not even seen the declaration, when the White House announced the accord, prompting some leaders to describe it as a "coup d'état".

The declaration failed to secure unanimous support, amid opposition from some developing nations which felt it failed to deliver the actions needed to halt dangerous climate change.

The accord has no long-term global targets for emission cuts or a timetable to turn the agreement into a legally-binding treaty.

It promises to deliver $10 billion of aid for developing nations for the next three years, with a goal of providing $100 billion a year by 2020 to help poor countries cope with the impacts of climate change. This money falls short of the $75-100 billion a year the UN says is needed now.

Friends of the Earth (FOE) said negotiations must now become even more intense to reach a just and effective climate agreement. "Politicians cannot call this outcome a success when nothing meaningful has been agreed," said chairman Martin Galea De Giovanni.

FOE dubbed the five-nation accord "a flimsy declaration", saying US President Obama's take-it-or leave-it ultimatum was shameful.

"We are disgusted by the failure of rich countries to commit to the emissions reductions they know are needed, especially the US," Mr De Giovanni said.

Birdlife said the way in which the no-deal was reached by the US and a handful of other countries goes completely against the UN charter.

"It also proves that radical action needed on the most important single issue for the future of our planet cannot be reached within the current global economic and political system. The Copenhagen summit has sealed the end of thousands of species and millions of poor people in developing nations," BLM executive director Tolga Temuge said.

Alternattiva Demokratika's spokesman on sustainable development Carmel Cacopardo said: "The impacts of climate change should lead us to consider whether Malta will be capable of supporting a population of 400,000."

In Copenhagen, Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi recognised the grave consequences of climate change on Malta, including the potential increase flow of immigrants. Africa is already feeling the impact of increased droughts and food scarcity, leading to larger numbers of refugees.

Before global leaders at the climate change conference, the Prime Minister pledged Malta's support, and said the country committed itself with credibility and transparency by applying to be recognised as one of the Annex I countries - a list of developed countries, including all EU member states except Cyprus.

The Prime Minister added that Malta's dedication to climate change has been constant, despite fighting back criticism at home on the choice of heavy fuel oil for the Delimara power plant extension.

Pressure is now on the government to create a plan to prepare the island to deal with the impacts.

Mr Brincat said it was positive for the Resources Minister to represent the EU on the summit's climate change adaptation committee but then one must recall that Malta does not yet have its own adaptation strategy.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Alex Ellul(on 21/12/09)
Peter, God has ensured that no human can ever destroy His creation, but G.O.D. is the next thing after the great CO2 scam/debacle. End-of-the-world pseudo-scientists have already mentioned that we 7 billion humans are breathing in too much oxygen into our lungs, thus causing Global Oxygen Depletion, or G.O.D. for short. Thus they will be able to secure millions of euros/dollars/sterling to make 'scientific' research and generaly come to the conclusion that THE END IS NIGH and the only solution is to collectively do a Hara-Kiri and 6 billion humans fall on our sword and thus save the planet. This is what the looney-left has been preaching, including Obama's chief scientific adviser John Holdren. Extract from one review:
Forced abortions. Mass sterilization. A "Planetary Regime" with the power of life and death over American citizens.

The tyrannical fantasies of a madman? Or merely the opinions of the person now in control of science policy in the United States? Or both?

These ideas (among many other equally horrifying recommendations) were put forth by John Holdren, whom Barack Obama has recently appointed Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy
The following is shocking to read: http://zombietime.com/john_holdren/
Peter Sammut(on 20/12/09)
Here we go again, "scientists" who have been caught altering facts, in order to fool people in believing their pseudo science, are still being defended by those who have a financial interest in keeping the convinced that the end of the planet is nigh. Now that the rising sea theory has been debunked, a new theory of acid carbonated sea is being floated . They ignore the number of volcanoes erupting in the depths of the oceans that for thousands of years have not made an iota of difference in causing carbonated soda seas; This Planet is a living entity and nature ensures its survival as long as the sun shines its healing rays on it.
It seems that no matter what these doomsters preach,Earth will only die when the sun`s fuel gives out, and there is nothing we can do to alter this fact. God has ensured this.

Poll

Do you agree with proposals made to the European Parliament for maternity leave to be extended to 20 weeks?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku