Same old, same old
Attentive readers will have noticed that I haven't been getting at the Lil' Elves' favourite politician for some time. Actually, it's the Lil' Elves' favourite politician's successor who I haven't been getting at because the Lil' Elves' favourite politician was actually Doctor Alfred Sant, if you remember him.
Dragging myself back from that convoluted little detour, it's Joseph Muscat at whom I haven't been getting, just in case you hadn't twigged it. Both here and in my blog, I've been discoursing on things other than the young hero of the Smart Set, that paragon of all squeaky clean virtues, the Leader of the Republic's Loyal Opposition.
But it occurred to me that I've been being a tad too kind with the dear chap, almost ungratefully so, he having been so kind on his part as to give me so much grist for my mill of late.
Where to start, such is the panoply of riches made available to me? Should I recall, with not a little disapproval, the lapse from normal standards of protocol and courtesy shown by leaving the King of Spain waiting for 15 minutes or whatever it was? In the good old days of Labour, it was Dom Mintoff, a less than couth type (when he wanted to be), who resorted to crassness to make his points, but at least he had the advantage of truculent Olde-Worlde socialism as his roots to fall back on. The current edition of the leadership of the Labour Party has nothing of the sort: on the contrary, he's trying to appeal to that segment of the population that prides itself on knowing how things should be done. Whoops, back to the drawing board.
Or should I gaze in wonderment on the sight of the shadow Prime Minister failing to take questions from the press after the Budget speech a couple of weeks ago? If there ever was a golden opportunity to show nimbleness and smart thinking, it was then and he ducked it. And then to make things worse, he didn't even speak in the House when the PM's own vote was on the agenda, giving horrid people like me the chance to ask snide questions on the lines of what was he scared of, then?
As if his star wasn't enough on the decline already (he's got many years to go and already the gloss is dimming badly) up popped the Data Protection Commissioner to kick the Labour Party's complaint about the Nationalists breaking the law well into touch. To give Labour their due, they've made quite a fist of spinning this reversal into not such a bad thing for them but, after having hauled so many people over the coals, the DPC's verdict was quite damning for them and there's no two ways about it.
And, of course, no hint of an apology for having been so hard on people who hadn't, actually, done anything.
Moving on, I was more than slightly confused by the way Dr Muscat's Labour Party tackled the BWSC/power station story.
First, they came over all sanctimonious about the spectre of corruption looming over the story and then it came out that what they were relying on were newspaper reports, of all things, and newspaper reports, to make things worse for them, which the Danish police had discounted.
Then, just to confuse me even further, young Joseph's bunch of genii got into a sputteringly high dudgeon about the way the government stuck up for the contractors. I mean, just what the heck did they expect, first they use BWSC as a stick with which to beat the government and then they come over all "shock horror" about the government defending itself.
Precisely what did they expect? Who is advising these people about how public perceptions are managed, for Heaven's sake? They just don't change, do they?
You'll have noticed my fair visage, of course, last Tuesday, with a burger on my bonce, in the middle pages of this estimable paper. I've had to answer the "why" question so often that I thought I'd better tell you all the story.
The thing is, the missus and a couple of artistic friends do portraits every week and one week, when the son and heir had already confected some rather delicious hamburgers, I was press-ganged into sitting, the booked victim having failed to show up. Such was the amount of bitchin' and moanin' that spewed forth from the Beckian cake-hole that Ms Caruana Dingli, a lady whose portraits are among the finest in the land, thought it would be a wheeze to depict me with that which was uppermost on my mind, viz and to whit, nosh.
And the rest, as they say, is history.
It's almost Christmas: you need to buy presents. This year it's easy: you've got Francesca Balzan's superb book on jewellery, which is probably among the best that Fondazzjoni Patrimonju Malti has ever produced and if you're feeling particularly generous, you can add Judge Giovanni Bonello's most recent book, which is a "goes without saying" as always.
9 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
mike turner
Dec 9th 2009, 14:45
"Same old, same old", yes that is a good description of your weekly offering of sad political bias, dear Bocca
J Martinelli
Dec 6th 2009, 18:16
@ laurence schembri
...because the way he behaves is embarrassing - because the policies he proposes are passé - because he misrepresents, makes invalid allegations, - because he is taking the LP back to the 70s, - because he seems so lost and out of place, wherever he is! Because he considers himself as 'unaccountable' by running away from journalists and absents himself from a Parliamentary debate which concerns him (in some future role)? Are these not enough reasons? Open your eyes and ears and maybe you will understand what I mean. Don't just read (Labour) papers - watch and hear!
There are many more reasons but I do not want to come across as having anything personal against the man. With a lot more grooming and a few more years of experience (if the LP can bear with him), then maybe he would be ready to assume more real responsibilities than just leading the Party.
The man isn't a 'nonentity' and hence the problem. But he cannot go on pretending what he isn't or acting as if he's on some sort of a charade.
You should comment on EFA - he gave you the freedom to do so.
J.Borg
Dec 5th 2009, 20:00
How come noone answered the question if this practice from PBO hasn't been put in place, so as to put us maltese people our mind at rest!!!!!!
laurence schembri
Dec 5th 2009, 18:31
Joe, just a friendly question. Why do you get so nigly about Joseph?
If the man is such a nonenity, why bother even to mention his name?
Follow my trend, I never comment about EFA.
J Martinelli
Dec 5th 2009, 17:16
@ Enzo Caruana
"Where were you when Joseph Muscat gave a fully fledged press conference about the budget"?
Is that when he refused to answer questions by the journalists?
"As regards Joseph Muscat's late arrival for his meeting with the King of Spain, you have to know that when a head of state visits many roads are blocked and traffic jams do happen".
Every time Joseph drives? How come others make it on time?
Read Beck's again - he already explained why his column is never 'same old, same old', but just in case, '...he (Joseph) having been so kind on his part as to give me so much grist for my mill of late' Kapish?
Oh! Joseph is so refreshingly naive!
Enzo Caruana
Dec 5th 2009, 14:07
A very apt title to your hackneyed article Dr Beck. Same old, same old nit-picking. Where were you when Joseph Muscat gave a fully fledged press conference about the budget.
As regards Joseph Muscat's late arrival for his meeting with the King of Spain, you have to know that when a head of state visits many roads are blocked and traffic jams do happen.
As regards the rest, nothing but the same old, same old hogwash from Dr Beck
J Martinelli
Dec 5th 2009, 13:22
" Who is advising these people about how public perceptions are managed, for Heaven's sake?"
Need you have asked the question, Bocc? I would have guessed - Marisa? Or perhaps, Anglu...Toni...? All stars in their own mind!
Muscat. Pat
Dec 5th 2009, 11:34
"There is so much good in the worst of us, and so much bad in the best of us, that it hardly becomes any of us to talk about the rest of us"
J.Borg
Dec 5th 2009, 09:40
@ I.M.Beck
it's amazing how you and all PN bloggers turn stories around to justify the PN side of things.
surely Joseph Muscat is getting on your nerves with his tactics......otherwise you want go round doing these things.
Please answer one question: Do you really think that if the data email wasn't sent by mistake, theprocess wouldn't have taken place?
Also, i would like to know as many maltese would like to know, if this process isn't actualy taking place!!