30% of Christmas lights are a "serious safety risk" - EU
30% of Christmas lights present an obvious and direct risk of fire and electric shocks according to a new report published today by the European Commission.
The report presents the conclusions of a joint market surveillance project involving authorities from five Member States - Hungary, Germany, Slovakia, Slovenia and the Netherlands - as well as the European Commission. Testing was carried out between November 2007- May 2009 at different intervals on 196 random samples of lighting chains across the entire price range. The samples were checked against over 20 administrative and technical requirements. Many lighting chains failed multiple tests.
The main results
Serious non-compliance problems leading to increased risks of electric shock, fire hazard or both were found in 30.4% of investigated lighting chains.
Generally, serious non-compliance problems mean failing technical safety requirements relating to the construction of, for example: plugs, cord anchorages, wiring, insulation, protection against electric shock. Less serious problems with non-compliance, i.e. deficiencies which do not immediately jeopardise the safety of the user were found in an additional 40% of lighting chains tested. These include certain labelling, instructions or administrative deficiencies.
The three main problems found were:
-
1. 25% of lighting chains failed the safety tests for the cord anchorage. Insufficient cord anchorage can lead to the electric wires coming loose with a high risk of electric shock (serious non-compliance).
-
2. 23% of lighting chains failed the requirement for "cross sectional area." This means that the wiring is too thin for the electric currents it is carrying, which increases the risk of overheating and fire (serious non-compliance).
-
3. 28 % failed the safety tests for cables. This means the insulation and construction of the chain is such that there is a risk of electric shock (serious non-compliance).
In addition:
-
A number of other technical requirements are also regularly not met, though less frequently, for example basic mechanical problems that can result in an injury from sharp edges.
-
Nearly 15% of samples did not carry the correct "technical markings" required. More importantly, warnings were lacking in 41% of the samples and proper user instructions in almost 35% of the samples.
-
Lighting chains regularly fail more than one of the safety tests. Some lighting chains failed nearly all the technical tests and many failed 4 to 7 tests.
-
The level of non-compliance varied from one Member State to another. While in Hungary, 95.7% of chains tested showed serious hazards to consumers, only 56% of those checked in the Netherlands showed any type of non-compliance. This is partially because the Netherlands has been carrying out market surveillance on lighting chains for 8 years and through these efforts has managed to halve the number of dangerous products destined for the market.
-
With regard to origin of the dangerous products, China accounted for approximately 41% of the 196 samples tested.
Advice for consumers
The European Commission said consumers must be vigilant and take basic precautions to minimise risk. There is strong pressure on manufacturers and retailers to produce Christmas lights as cheaply as possible, as consumers often do not want to spend much money on what are temporary decorations. This can lead to gross violations of safety standards.
-
Buy Christmas lights from reputable dealers where basic safety standards should be assured.
-
Never leave Christmas lights on when you are out of the house or at night when people are asleep.
-
If you suspect there is any kind of electrical or mechanical problem, with new lights or lighting chains you have already been using, don't take a chance. Stop using them and bring them back to the shop and complain.
6 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Dave Alan Caruana
Dec 3rd 2009, 02:14
Mr. Philip Cortis,
before typing away did you take a moment to think why we do not use 12v/5v in the first place? A TV that consumes 150 watts would go from circa 0.6 Amps on the 240v supply to 12.5 Amps on 12v, 30 Amps on 5v. That would require heavy conductors, and even heavier plugs / switchgear. Would the 12v home wiring be designed to run 100 Amps? 200 Amps?
Andrew Cumbo
Dec 2nd 2009, 18:50
I am not going to be exposed for this risk, since we are not going to decorate our home. The most serious safety risk of a shock for us, is when we are going to receive the WATER & ELECTRICITY BILL with the new costly tariffs imposed on us as from January 2010.
Paul Vassallo
Dec 2nd 2009, 17:19
Xmas lights and decorations on and about road ROUND ABOUTS are of distraction and might cause traffic accidents.
E.Muscat
Dec 2nd 2009, 14:35
Obviously the EU should have spoken about this a long time ago, as Malta should have spoken about the 2-pin plastic adaptors of 13A sockets after long years of usage:these electrical gadgets are made in China where safety is not of prime importance,only price!
Philip B Cortis
Dec 2nd 2009, 14:16
I see 2 problems
1) Safety as rightly highlighted in this report
2) Most light when a bulb or 2 not working, the whole set will fail. There is the option to use the LED but these are not so bright.
The solution, which actually will work for most small electrical appliances is to include a central, high eficient PSU feeding a second set of wiring 12V and 5V. Electronics that coan work on such are Radios, mobile phone (chargers), LED lighting, cordless phones, computers, TV decoders, satellite receivers, Internet modems and routers.
Benifits include
1) Such devices and wiring will be much safer (virtually eliminating the risk of shock)
2) We will consume less electricity (lower bills and less carbon) (a saving of around 30%)
3) In the long run the devices will be cheaper since the PSU in each device is eliminated
4) LED lighting will become much cheaper (the main cost of LED light is to lower the voltage is a small space inside the light housing).
All the EU had to do is
1) Create a single standard for the whole EU
2) Set a changeover deadline
EU think
John Micallef
Dec 2nd 2009, 13:17
Can the EU advise what percentage of non Ce aproved products are being circulated in the EU trough EBAY, with all risks to users & treath to busniusses pls?