
Friday, 27th November 2009
Balluta car park a health hazard
It now seems that the Balluta car park is destined to get the go-ahead in spite of local residents' objections.
Apart from vague references to "significant traffic problems" and "resident parking problems" in the Sliema/St Julians area, there seems little clear justification for this car park as both these problems are related to over-development. It is time that it is realised that Sliema and St Julians will continue to have traffic problems as long as apartment blocks continue to be built. Adding a car park in St Julians will serve to attract more development, attract cars to an already polluted area and divert people away from public transport through continuing to encourage increased car use.
As a result of growing awareness of the threat to health from traffic pollution, the attitude in other countries is to discourage car use in cities, towns and highly urbanised areas. By contrast, Malta does exactly the opposite by building apartment blocks in already over-developed areas and causing inevitable traffic congestion (i.e. those so-called "significant traffic problems") and increasing the need for parking space. At the same time there is pious talk of transport reform as a means of "getting people out of their car". This simply will not happen as long as car use continues to be encouraged.
A more important aspect is that of health. From a public health point of view, this projected car park is unacceptable. People residing in the built-up areas of Malta are all exposed to the double health threat of increased cancer rates and premature death from traffic pollution on the one hand, and from lack of physical exercise with resultant obesity, maturity onset diabetes and premature heart and circulatory disease, on the other. This is particularly so in certain highly polluted areas in Malta - including Sliema and especially St Julians bay.
The streets adjoining Balluta Bay are already overloaded with traffic. Even if the profit motive makes a car park irresistible, this simply cannot - and must not - override adverse health consequences. This car park will result in a serious traffic impact on the surrounding streets, especially the uphill, one-way Old College Street. This relatively narrow street carries a huge volume of outgoing traffic exiting from Sliema and is phenomenally polluted. Residents in this road are particularly exposed to the risk of lung cancer and shortened life span. Also, children growing up in polluted areas are susceptible to lung damage from traffic emissions. These are scientifically proven facts. An environment impact assessment of the Balluta underground project must include the impact on traffic congestion, pollution and health. If health considerations are not included in assessing the benefit of this project, then this goes against the health interests of local residents.
The bottom line is this: The vicious cycle of increasing traffic congestion and the need for parking space through permitting construction of more apartment blocks simply cannot go on in the Sliema/St Julians area. Encouraging yet more car use by building car parks is counter-intuitive in terms of health, even in the best of conditions. The health of local residents is paramount and encouraging any increase in traffic can only serve to intensify the significant existing threat to health from pollution.
If the Sliema/St Julians councils opt to go ahead with this and other car parks, the only interpretation is that there is a profit motive which is wrongly receiving priority over everything else - including the health of the very residents whose interests they are supposed to uphold. The emphasis should be on making our streets more pedestrian-friendly and improving the attraction of public transport so that car dependency diminishes - adding car parks is not the way to go about this.







RSS
Comments
AT last nights meeting at the Meridien Hotel, while discussing the proposed U/G carpark , I referred to the large 300/350 Open Parking Space at the end of the road off Bay Junction.
One of the residents had information that there are plans for the usual block of flats replacing this Hotel Parking ,an area larger than BALLUTA SQUARE and streets around.
It seems that this last remaining hillside piece of typical MALTESE COUNTRYSIDE is up for grabs .
This dead end street, already contains a number of APARTMENT BLOCKS , that once enjoyed the Bay View . Now cheekily SCREENED OFF by the hotel .
This area is only accessable through the steep , narrow Bay Junction that at the bottom end FEATURES a very ackward ,dangerous, hard to manouvre , even steeper BLIND Corner converging on a restricted , permanantly congested area in Main Street .
Then we are told that this proposed Balluta u/g parking is essentially part of Traffic Management Schemes for this locality !
The St. Julians Local Council unveiled this U/G CYLINDERICAL AUTOMATED (?) CARPARK ,but the plans presented only showed the lay-by of the rectangular lift platform at STREET LEVEL and a stereotype sectional diagram . This is not sufficient as the exact excavated area under the square and street is not defined at all . When I SHOUTED OUT to the architect to tell us the exact footprint , he ignored me and went on with his useless lecture !
To make matters worst , they also propose a link up to this by a WATER TAXI ( look like closed jet boats) to strategic points around the Bay . Swimmers beware .
I'd like to know the Master Mind behind all this fantasy !
To counter balance all of this against a maximum of 120 car spaces is beyong comprehension.
Either council lacks a conscience and has no foresight, or the lure of the Euro is too powerful.
If I could be there tonight to lend my support I would. I ask that those of you who can make it to the meeting do so, and lend your voice to opposing this project and to saving Balluta Square. The citizens of Balluta deserve better than what THEIR council is proposing.
It is absurd how local councils (e.g.Balluta and Sliema Local Councils) are inclined to give priority to the some residents' convenience (parking) probelms, rather than to residents' health (air pollution caused by motor vehicle traffic ) problems.
But perhaps we get the local and central governments that we deserve, don't we??.
It is so ironic that this letter appears on the same day as Perit Alex Torpiano, the Head of the Department of Architecture at the University is using the Graduation to call for more building in urban areas, bringing in thousands more cars which will need more car parks. This although he must know we have over 75,000 empty houses/flats.
It would be interesting to know what the Slimizi neighbours of his MIDI and Fort Cambridge projects think of his proposals.
Yet another very disappointing case of people using their top positions to push their personal interests.
The issues of health and environment must not be ignored - would the Maltese M.P. for Europe be able to shed light on any of these matters? I cannot imagine such a proposal would be given ANY air time at all in other European destinations .