• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

National exams to replace Junior Lyceum, Common Entrance exams from 2011

Social Studies has been removed as a requirement for the Junior Lyceum, Education Minister Dolores Cristina said today.

Speaking at a press conference, she said that pupils will still have to sit for Maltese, Maths, English and Religion exams as part of their Junior Lyceum and Common Entrance examinations. They will also still be examined in Social Studies, but not as an entry requirement.

The last set of Common Entrance and Junior Lyceum exams will be held in May 2010.

As from 2011, the concept of the Junior Lyceum exams will cease, and the current examinations system for progression from primary to secondary schools will be replaced by three national exams - Maths, Maltese and English, and the pupils will then move to secondary schools within their area colleges.

Church and Private Schools will be invited to join the new system.

The minister said that streaming was this year removed from all Grade V classes in government schools, and it would also be removed from Grade VI next year. Students would be assessed for their abilities and grouped according to the support they needed.

For example, the minister said, a pupil who was strong in Maths but weak in English would be placed in a group of the same level. This concept, she said, led to mixed ability classrooms.

She said the reforms were being accompanied by the training of support professionals including teachers, psychologists, youth workers and counsellors. Two special units were being set up in primary and secondary schools, called nurture groups and learning support zones respectively, where children could receive emotional and educational support where needed.

The minister also spoke on the government's commitment to improve the schools environment and said a new school is being built every year.

CHURCH SCHOOLS EXPANDING

The minister said three Church schools - St Paul's Missionary College,St Augustine College, Savio College and the Minor Seminary were planning to each open a primary school while Theresa Nuzzo school would expand to also have a secondary school.

Entrance to Church school junior classes will remain by ballot.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

jessica borg (on 28/11/09)
x'hawn fil-hajja minghajr ezami?
dan kollu dahk fil-wicc...biex min hu tajjeb jinzel u min hu inqas tajjeb jibqa' kif inhu...
no stress minghalina...pajjiz jibqa' niezel
konsulta mal-ghalliema????
gvern kollu l-istess ....u-turns ta' zmien il-comprehensive system li falliet....
grazzi lil kull min qed jahdem ghal min ghandu l-ulied u hu ma ghandux amment ta' xi jfisser
u ghaziza ministru...int lil uliedek u lil ulied uliedek fil-kullegg tal-imhalltin bghatthom bilhaqq??
Rachel Theuma (on 27/11/09)
Ballot..the UNFAIREST system ever. PLease refrain from preaching to us that playing the Super 5 on wednesday is not good for us. How bad is playing on a ballot your education?? Think about that. We had one last chance to do it the right way: Ghin ruhek biex Alla jghinek. .How can we do it now??? Pray ?? Go to Lourdes?? Thanks for making us feel unworthy !
ncaruana (on 27/11/09)
nixtieq nistaqsi :allura it-tifel tieghi bhalissa qieghed year 5 mhux ha jkollu cans li jidhol go skola tal knisja?
Joe E Galea (on 27/11/09)
This reform is another recipe for a well blended soup.
J ATTARD (on 27/11/09)
Is it true that all who by ballot now enter church schools will automatically proceed to church secondary schools with the same principal being applied to public schools?

If so, is this not discramanatory, since before it had been that any student could take exams preceding their entry into secondary school. If the above is true, then any options that the parents had regarding the schooling of their children is now being taken unjustly away. This is even truer in Gozo since (always,if the above is valid) the options for children are even more constrained.

I would appreciate if anyone could clarify the above matter for me.
Larissa Portelli (on 27/11/09)
Hello? can't you read? Social Studies will not be removed!! It is just not a requirement for the Junior Lyceum. Students are still going to keep on learning Social Studies.Why does it have to be an exam anyway?
joanna farrugia (on 27/11/09)
all this is unfair for boys of year 6 who cant now try to go to a church school.this system mean one thing saving money from the public school.

@Klaus M. Pedersen its simple you apply for your kids to attend church primary school and after primary they go straight to a secondary school.there are already church schools who done it this system from this year.st aloysius usually takes 4 new entrance for form1 but this year only 1 class cos of stella maris school were included.thats why i say all this is unfair for every boy who attends public school.everyone must have a chance!!!
simone aquilina (on 26/11/09)
Why is social studies being removed and religion left when children in year 6 still attend cathecism classes especially if they want to obtain their confirmation. Social studies is an interesting subject, important for their education and furthermore children actually enjoy it. ....and it boosts civi pride which unfortunately we sorely lack on this island.
Daniel Vella (on 26/11/09)
Why remove social studies (a subject that teaches children about the historical and cultural aspects of Malta and other VERY useful knowledge), and keep Religion?
Granted - Religion, specifically Roman Catholicism, IS part of Maltese culture, but personally I'd rather see that done away with than Social Studies.
GovDeMartino (on 26/11/09)
Nehhu l-ezamijiet, nehhu l-istreaming u se tiskumnikaw kollox!
Klaus M. Pedersen (on 26/11/09)
"Church and Private Schools will be invited to join the new system."

What does that mean? How will entrance to Church schools be decided under the new system?

Mark Farrugia (on 25/11/09)
One can notice a contradiction about education system that whist Social Studies [incorporating Science and Maltese History] will not be a requirement at Primary level so as not to demoralise students; Systems of Knowledge at Tertiary level is being imposed on students [especially with an overloaded A level Sciences Syllabus] to hinder them from qualifying for University Science Degree Courses. Why are the authorities lamenting of lack of scientists, nurses and doctors?
Another issue which totally overseen is the physical skill issue. If our educational system has the aim of producing a wholistically developed person why aren't physical skills being assessed and developed at such sensitive neurological developmental ages as those at Primary school ages in parallel with the skills of Numeracy and Literacy.
Nobody has ever wondered why our stressed students at Tertiary level let off steam at illicit parties rather than by using physical exercise? As a nation we are loosing a number of academic talents because of this.
Whilst it seems politically ideal to care for the mases of lesser talents, I feel we should not give less attention to those who are more gifted.
Massimo Borg (on 25/11/09)
i think they Religion should be removed as well; It doesn't make sense to be tested in Religion to advance into a new school; What does religion has to do with it? They're not being tested to go into seminary, are they? Actually it's even better if religion is no longer part of our children's curriculum in schools; They simply don't need it;
A.Scerri (on 25/11/09)
Whilst welcoming this long awaited reform to remove the unnecessary stress being endured by our 10 year-olds, I beg to differ with the decision to remove Social Studies (SS) and retain Religion. My child is in Year 4 and I am bewildered by the amount of material they have to study by heart in both Religion and SS. The BIG difference between the two subjects is that SS is much more practical and logical and provides the children with skills needed in day-to-day activities. From what I can see, Religion all boils down to learning by heart sometimes irrelevant material which not even we as grown-ups have any interest in learning! Furthermore, our children are already taught Religion at the MUSEUM centres...so regret to say that the decision to remove SS and retain Religion smacks of ecclesiastical over goverment authority.
N Caruana (on 25/11/09)
@ j Ciantar there is a difference between 'streaming' and 'setting' ! when students are streamed they spend the whole scholastic year... probably ALL their school life stuck in the same stream. In setting children just spend a number of hours in a particular class and for a particular subject.
Research shows that children who are taught in mixed ability classrooms benefit much more than those who are taught in ability grouped classes. (Ref to PISA reports 2003, 2006 )
Teaching a mixed ability class requires much more preparation from the teachers and the need to use more resources (especially human resources).
This reform also asks for a serious rethinking of our assessment system! we should try to assess understanding rather than the reproduction of material taught!
i am totally in favour of the proposed reform as an idea but i have my sincere doubts about it's full success first and foremost because lots of teachers are still in favour of streaming and secondly because unfortunately this reform was built on a political agenda. such a radical change is impossible to be carried out in just 2 years AND without it being 'tested' through a pilot study!
Joe Sciberras (on 25/11/09)
I hope the removal of the Social Studies exam does not mean that this subject will lose its importance. Apart from teaching our children the history and major events of our small island, it is also teaching them how to respect our environment.
It seems that we are gradually moving away from streaming and towards mixed ability classes. This is something to encourage but I cannot see it working when you have a class of students whose abilities are extremely varied.
Gerard Cassar (on 25/11/09)
Before the last amendment to the entrance to the Lyceum, secondary school examination only 3 subjects were required Maltese, English, Artithmetic. That was so for tens of years. Now that Socuial studies has been witdrawn, it appears that also religion has no place in the entrance examination so that everything reverts to former requirments.
It does not mean that religiious studies are eliminated but just as Social studies remain so will Religion. Perhas it will remain for entry to church schools.
It is to be remembered that there are pupils who are exempt from attending religion lessons.
Maryanne Azzopardi (on 25/11/09)
Jiena ghandi tifel qed year 6.Kont diga ghaddejt minna din tal junior lyceum tlett snin ilu. It-tfal kissirnihom bl-istudju.Ikollhom xorti ma jaqbadomx depression kemm ghandhom sillabu tqil.Kull suggett fih tieghu. Allura jekk ser jitnehhew l-ezamijiet ghalfejn ma nehhewhomx mill ewwel jew almenu nehhew ir religjon ukoll. Nixtieq inkun naf jekk il ministru hux qeda thares mill aspett tat tfalax jiena veru jiddispjacini specjalment meta nara li certu tfal jigu ezentati milli jaghmlu xi ezami.
Joseph Ciantar (on 25/11/09)
Streaming will not be radically eliminated, for better or for worse. It is being removed temporarily from the primary section. "Setting" , which is much the same as streaming, is being introduced later in the secondary level. Setting, which, of course has its pluses, is being introduced at a later stage, that is, in the forms at the secondary. Streaming and setting are, educationally speaking, much the same. By the way, we have been carrying out setting methodologies for a very long time already, at least in some schools.
Saviour Sam Agius (on 25/11/09)
Xi trid tgħid biha li għas-subien u għall-bniet se jkun hemm programmi edukattivi differenti? Ma nafx riditx tfisser biha hekk imma hekk tinftiehem. Mela se nżiduha iżjed id-differenza bejn is-sessi fi żmien meta suppost qegħdin naħdmu għall-ugwaljanza.
Suzanne Zarb (on 25/11/09)
What a pity. Why wasn't Religion removed instead of Social Studies ? What about those students who do not sit for the Religion exam ? These will surely benefit more now as they have to study only for 3 exams. I am a Year 6 teacher and really feel sorry for my students. Social Studies is far more interesting than Religion and the students definitely enjoy the Social Studies lesson more. Another case where the teachers weren't consulted.

Maybe this is the reason why the Social Studies syllabus was revised this year ........ again... and the teachers being informed of the changes a week after school started this September, when the planning for the 'old' syllabus had already been done.

What a shame !
Reuben Zarb (on 25/11/09)
Obviously the students who are exempt from Religion will be at an advantage again. If a pupil who participates in Religion lessons does not pass the JL exam then it's bye bye JL for him. Not so for the ones exempt. Is this fair ? To say it all this is also true for children exempt from other subjects. I know of a child who was exempt from...........wait for it..........Religion, Maltese and Social Studies because she did not speak Maltese (she was a foreigner)...........and she was in an 'A' class, taking the place of another student (Maltese). Incredible but true. And, I forgot to mention that she was also given a prize during Prize Day for her reading skills.

This and many similar cases are what the authorities should take note of. Unfortunately the truth is that the people on top do not have much experience in schools and in classrooms.................if at all.
joe camenzuli (on 25/11/09)
The Minister said that for this year religion will be retained for the Junior Lyceum entrance examination. What we want to know ...those pupils that are excused from sitting this exam because they are of a different belief, are they being examined in an extra subject instead.
Damian Fenech (on 25/11/09)
Remove Social Studies but keep Religion ?????

Back to the middle ages, or do I hear Fred Flinstone reversing his car?
Eric Gahn (on 25/11/09)
No Social Studies???? Is this a joke??
kevin scicluna (on 25/11/09)
La ir-riforma hemm bzonn issir ghax is sistema prezenti mhix tajba il ghala ma bditx issehh min din is- sena? u xi trid tghid biha li thalla obbligatorju l-exami tar religjon meta x`hin rajt il past papers veru huwa tqil? Mela is-salib jitnehha imma l-exami le?? Xi trid tfisser meta tghid li l-istudju socjali ser isir l-exami pero mhux bhala bzonn biex jidhlu mela x`ser isir jghamel? Nixiteq nara risposti. Grazzi
Christian Sciberras (on 25/11/09)
[sarcasm]

Sure! We need Social Studies back!

We want our children to recognize the difference between plants, birds and fish (to the least detail)!

We're talking about Malta, you know, the tiny country with it's commerce based on fish and agriculture, and island where 95% are fishermen, hunters or farmers!

[/sarcasm]
G. Portelli (on 25/11/09)
Dear minister,

Quote "For example, the minister said, a pupil who was strong in Maths but weak in English would be placed in a group of the same level. This concept, she said, led to mixed ability classrooms."

I ask mixed ability in the subject or in overall profeciency of subjects. How can this be done in all schools??? Does this mean that small schools will have more teachers employed so that classes can be divided??? What abou church schools dear minister? Are they also going to have more availability of teachers so that this new form of streaming can be applied -as many are too small to afford it. This sounds like a half baked cake dear minister and those who eat from this cake might get an indigestion. Let' s see and hope that time will not show us that this will be a repeat of history!!!
nmifsud (on 25/11/09)
@DOLORES CRISTINA
Ghalfejn ma nehhux ir religion ukoll? it tifel tieghi qieghed yr6 u meta nigu biex nistudjaw ir religion insibu li fih hafna affarjiet li lanqas jien qatt ma kont studjajtom meta kont izghar u li kont imurr fi skola tal knisja. mhux qed nghid inehhu il lesson tieghu, ghax kollox hu mportanti, izda jitnehha l-ezami tieghu ghax ghandom 3kotba x'jistudjaw u mhux xi sugett li jistaw ikomplu jistudjaw fuqu. u dan sena ohra xorta ha jitnehha allur jista jitnehha din is sena bhal ma tnehha is social studies!!
Ray Buhagiar (on 25/11/09)
At last common sense prevails. One examination is more than enough for our students and please If have a look at the JL Year 1 statistics and you will see that the Junior Lyceum entrance examination is not really measuring knowledge.
E. Vassallo (on 25/11/09)
The church school ballot porocess is one of the most unjust that exists. It is like playing super 5 or the lotto. How is that for equality???
c mizzi (on 25/11/09)
The only subject that thought Maltese history and culture was removed. But religion(aka christianity) is still mandatory .... :(
c. camilleri (on 25/11/09)
This new system, the removing of streaming was tried many yrs ago and proved a complete failure with many promising children having their school career ruined. Hope history will not repeat itself to the detriment of the children involved. At that time the N. P. in opposition opposed the new system.
Aimee Fenech (on 25/11/09)
I think relion should be removed as well, what they really need to make sure of is that all pupils are literate and numarate to an agreed standard. What you know about religion shouldn't come into it as its irrelevant.
john Micallef (on 25/11/09)
Dear Grace,
with same mentality soon you will end up removing the religion. And after the millions of Euros spent in this issue, we will end up with 3 exams as originally use to be!!

I this value for moeny minister??
Edric Micallef Figallo (on 25/11/09)
Overall this seems positive, but the removal of Social Studies is inappropriate. There should be some subject which tests pupils on their (basic) understanding of the State, history, civic virtues et cetera, and yes it should be an entry requirement. This doesn't mean that Social Studies should necessarily remain, it would have been ideal for it to be changed in content and if need be in name in order to instill a sense of citizenship and belonging to our Republic in our youths, our future. Leaving a vacuum in such an area is not commendable.

As for the removal of streaming, I have my reserves if this is not accompanied by an increased sense of discipline in the classroom and beyond. An undisciplined classroom is to the detriment of the studious student, who now would end up with students who aren't bred up to be true to their designation, students.

Finally, I hope this reform yields positive results.
J.Tanti (on 25/11/09)
It is about time we exclude students, teachers, parents and the rest involved in childrens' education the stress that such examinations bring about and allow far more time for self expression, creativity, arts and a natural need to learn and develop. Why has it took so long to realise that streaming was never a success when compared what pupils really need to develop? On the other hand one must not forget that some form or mainstream in relation to one's strengths and also reasonable competitive situations help motivation unlike total streaming. I hope that this may keep developing forward to a better long-last future towards a positive education.
U. D'Amico (on 25/11/09)
so the change is:

change of name
removal of religion and social studies (to help students have LESS idea then they already have about the world around them)

well done! (this took us almost 2 years to compile! )
Joss Galea (on 25/11/09)
Social Studies removed....goodbye to general knowledge!!

Poll

Do you agree with the compensation that is being given to the bus owners?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku