Families could pay €23m more in utilities
Compared to what? Sources - Target revenue: Infrastructure Ministry. Family revenue: the Deloitte Report commissioned by the Resources Authority earlier this year worked out that about 39 per cent of Enemalta's revenue came from households. Additional expense: this is what households will be expected to pay more in January compared to the October tariffs and the current rates introduced in April.
Families could pay an additional €23 million over their present bills when the new water and electricity tariffs are introduced in January, a far cry from the €4 million quoted by the Finance Minister.
An exercise undertaken by The Times shows that, in all probability, Tonio Fenech was comparing the January rates, which have yet to be announced, with the all-time high October 2008 tariffs rather than with what consumers are paying now.
Despite speaking about the new tariffs on Sunday and quantifying their impact, Mr Fenech was reluctant to elaborate on his statement even though he was provided with this newspaper's workings.
"The Malta Resources Authority is evaluating the requests that have been presented to it, so there is nothing to add at the moment," he said when asked whether he was comparing the 2010 tariffs with the present tariffs or the October 2008 ones.
When speaking at the Nationalist Party general council meeting, Mr Fenech said the higher tariffs in January would mean an additional expense of €14 million for families, which would be brought down to €4 million with the one-off compensation of €10 million announced by the government in the Budget speech.
However, analysing Enemalta's costs made public by the Infrastructure Ministry on November 6, residential consumers could be expected to collectively fork out an additional expense of €33.4 million over their present bills. If the one-off energy compensation is taken into account, families would have to foot a bill of €23.4 million in 2010.
Nowhere does it result that families would be paying an additional €4 million unless the figures are compared with the October 2008 tariffs.
In fact, the difference between the burden families will shoulder come January and what they had to carry in October 2008 works out at about €13.5 million. Deducting €10 million would see households shouldering an additional €3.5 million over the October tariffs.
The new tariff structure was introduced in October last year and caused an uproar. On April 1, in line with falling oil prices, tariffs were cut by 22 per cent for households and by up to 26 per cent for commercial and industrial consumers.
Meanwhile, on Monday, the recently-set up trade union confederation, Għaqda Unions Maltin, asked the energy regulator for a meeting to clarify a number of issues linked to the tariffs.
Confederation chairman John Bencini said unions wanted to know whether the government had consulted with the resources authority before announcing the energy compensation in the Budget.
It also wanted to clarify whether the tariffs would be introduced for a whole year and whether the regulator would be looking into Enemalta's inefficiencies.
6 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
R. Zammit
Nov 19th 2009, 07:54
Why bother?? With our pathetic mentality if the wind stops and the sun would not shine enough, the government of the day will take the blame!! :)))
We deserve a bit of humour this morning don’t we! :)
Jonathan Camilleri
Nov 18th 2009, 21:28
@pzammit
I hope the government implements alternative forms of energy; the earlier the better. So far I'm pleased to note their hinting at them, but I do look forward to seeing them materialize whilst we are happily signing cheques to make up for the increase in oil prices.
I also look forward to MRA actually releasing the real tariffs, and, to Water Services Corporation being more transparent when it comes to dealing with customers, typically:
1. Answering questions correctly and without a lot of red tape and playing the old trick of passing telephone calls around so that the "average joe" gives up.
2. Publishing the tariffs for residential and commercial utility rates, since it is only the customers' right to know (and double check if necessary) what they are paying for.
I have had a bad time trying to ask simple questions to WSC and was faced with a lot of replies quoting charges for everything, and, I've honestly had enough of this childish attitude that they have towards customers.
mgrech
Nov 18th 2009, 19:06
And how many millions do you think we would have to spend on windmills to power Malta?
And do you realize how much land we would have to dedicate to that? With the high cost of land in Malta multiply your current electricity bill by 8 for 9 years then they will have the money to fund such a project. The only feasible alternative is nuclear power
Mark Galea
Nov 18th 2009, 13:57
@pzammit
those millions cannot be spend on 'new technology' because
1) new technology cannot supply more than a percentage of our daily consumption
2) it would be much more expensive than it is alreay today.
laurence schembri
Nov 18th 2009, 13:39
I don`t believe it. Neither does Tonio Fenech.
pzammit
Nov 18th 2009, 13:26
Knowing that the price of oil is on the increase, and also that oil will become scarce as time goes on, I ask why invest millions of euros in old technologies which consume oil? Why not spend all these millions in new clean technology. Say install photovoltaic cells on the other side of Comino which is not visible from Malta, so that it's not an eyesore, but produces clean energy for part of Malta. Also we can invest heavily by installing wind turbines inland, on sites which are not frequented such as Dingli Cliffs, L-ahrax tal Mellieha and other sites.