Utilities to cost families €4m more
Government paying €34m in subsidies for tariffs
Malta's families will be forking out an additional €4 million for their water and electricity next year after a €14 million overall rise in their bills is countered by €10 million in government compensation.
The €14 million figure was revealed by Finance Minister Tonio Fenech yesterday, just over a week after the government announced that households and commercial consumers would be paying higher water and electricity rates from January 1.
Despite the hike having been announced, the new tariffs have not yet been published, pending review by the Malta Resources Authority.
However, Mr Fenech yesterday let slip the government's overall estimate for families - perhaps the most politically sensitive group - when he argued that the government was making good for the impact of this rise through the €10 million one-time compensation announced in the Budget.
Roughly divided among the 148,000-odd households, the €14 million increase would mean that in 2010 each household would be paying an average of €95 more than they did this year.
However, this would be slashed to €27 over a 12-month period when taking the compensation into consideration.
Speaking at the Nationalist Party general council, Mr Fenech said "every spare euro should be given to families" to counter the impact of the tariffs, adding that the compensation fund would be spread among 97 per cent of families.
"We could have helped fewer families, and given more to those most in need, which would have been closer to our values," he said, in reference to criticism by Nationalist MP Jean Pierre Farrugia, who on Friday questioned the suitability of the one-off energy allowance for families with children insisting that €130 for a family of four was not enough.
Earlier Investments Minister Austin Gatt said this year the government was paying €34 million in subsidies for the tariffs, and this would have to be increased because the price of oil was going up.
Dr Gatt said for tariffs not to go up the government would have needed to use more tax money for subsidies. "To date nobody from the Labour Party has said how much tax money should be used to subsidise water and electricity consumption."
New higher tariffs were introduced in October last year and caused uproar in the country. They were cut by 22 per cent for households and by up to 26 per cent for commercial and industrial consumers in April.
But yesterday, Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi said the tariffs would be revised to the same levels they were around a year ago. Oil prices reached a high of $147.27 per barrel in July 2008.
Last May Dr Gatt admitted that the increases in the utility rates should have been introduced from January.
Yesterday, the Labour Party criticised Dr Gonzi for creating uncertainty by not putting figures on the new tariffs. It said that although oil prices this year had reached a low of $40 per barrel, the government was saying that the tariffs would be the same as last year.
8 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Nigel Lawrence
Nov 17th 2009, 07:32
NO, the €14 million IS paid in full by the consumer. Where the devil do you think the government gets that €10 million compensation? From the consumer of course. So, in this respect, no matter how careful one can be with one's own utilitirs consumption we are STILL paying this €10 million extra.
maria curmi
Nov 16th 2009, 19:56
Give 1 take 7 = WSC bills smart meters or smart minister who was so proud not to to hedge because it was done by PL before and now we have to pay and can anyone explian how Enemalta is in red and spending 70 milions on smart meters next year it will be bankrupt like the dockyard
G .Mangion
Nov 16th 2009, 18:39
@ Nigel Lawrence Please be a bit clearer in your comment, Are you saying that, families in need, Should not have a mobile phone or a car ?? if so, What is going to happen to many hundreds of people are going to do when the rent reform will be implied by next Jan 2010 ? you wait till then Mr Nigel Lawrence, and we are gonna see People not only without mobiles & car's, But homeless Families with no roof on their head's too no ?? ...........
Joe Vella
Nov 16th 2009, 18:20
@ Lino DeBono To hedge there have to be sellers. Who would sell you at a loss? Why do you think You read in the press that there are tankers carrying oil anchored all over the world, including just about 20 kilometers off the Maltese shores?
Steve Atlamyob
Nov 16th 2009, 18:00
Why are we burning expensive and highly toxic imported fuel for energy when we have all the wind, waves, and sunshine we need and extra to provide clean environmentally low impacting energy as do other forward thinking countries? Why are we burning our trash and other waste when all of it can be recycled or turned into compost? We could certainly do with more soil! Does any of this waste get burned and turned into power? We are a Third World Nation and have a fourth World mentality. It's so frustrating. Let’s turn the “filthy rock” as it’s known world wide, into the cleanest. “If you plant the seeds (clean and healthy life style) they (tourists/visitors) will come”.
Nigel Lawrence
Nov 16th 2009, 14:31
It would be interesting to speculate how many of these "families in need" have a couple of cars parked outside their front door and all their kids are using mobile 'phones.
Lino DeBono
Nov 16th 2009, 13:54
Sir,
What I do not understand is why the Government or any of its Authorities did not hedge oil for the coming 2 years when the price for a barrel of crude oil was in the region of $40.
I find it hard not to think that any serious and efficient authority did not impliment this.
Lino DeBono
Xewkija.
laurence schembri
Nov 16th 2009, 13:10
I keep saying, there`s no money in the kitty.