• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Pandora's Box is opening

The Labour Party's decision to provide a home for Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transexual groups (LGBT) comes as no surprise. The setting up of an LGBT Section within the PL has been ostensibly done in the name of tolerance and inclusion. Unfortunately, this move, which follows the traditional socialist pattern, makes a mockery of individual rights for these are not there to be enjoyed by virtue of an individual being a "member" of a particular group.

Far from being inclusive, the end result will be divisive. Traditionally the begetter of socialism, Marxism has thrived on envy and class warfare. Since it can no longer seriously claim to be fighting for the working class, Marxism now seeks to survive by identifying other perceived victim groups in order to justify its existence and founding principles. And where victims do not exist, the Left simply creates them.

The end result is to divide society into distinct and fragmented groups, each lobbying for their vested interests, which many a time are in conflict with, or detrimental to, society as a whole. This is a deliberate strategy because a divided society cannot function effectively and the resulting contradictions would always necessitate the intervention of the state. In the weak position they find themselves in at the moment, progressives all over Europe are seeking new ways to bring in the old, all-knowing, controlling state through the back door.

A free society, however, is built on the concept of natural justice and inalienable rights irrespective of race, sex or creed. By bestowing extra rights on real or imaginary victim groups, the Progressive ideology therefore completely undermines natural justice by bestowing extra privileges that are based entirely on race, sex and creed. It is a complete inversion of values.

If the PL set up an LGBT section within its structures, why shouldn't it create sections for illegal immigrants, drug addicts who insist on seeing themselves as victims of society, criminals who claim they were driven to crime by poverty and every other group that, rightly or wrongly, believes it is a victim?

We, at Azzjoni Nazzjonali, see this as the thin edge of the wedge. We have repeatedly warned that with the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty and the enshrinement of the so-called charter of fundamental rights, these alien, undemocratic and unchristian tenets will be imposed on us whether we like it or not. The European Court of Human Rights has just ruled against the use of crucifixes in classrooms in Italy. It said the practice violated the right of parents to educate their children as they saw fit and ran counter to the child's right to freedom of religion.

Everything that Azzjoni Nazzjonali claimed would come in on the back of the Lisbon Treaty seems about to happen.

We are already witnessing the mushrooming of posters such as those found in Mosta and Naxxar espousing so called alternative families, posters depicting a child with two parents of the same sex. It is a subtle strategy propaganda paid by tax payers' money to condition the population to accept the inevitable imposition of progressive Marxism. The PL, true to its calling, has espoused it. Will the PN follow suit?

Dr Muscat is leader of Azzjoni Nazzjonali.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

M. Xuereb (5 days ago)
Re. Josie Muscat's concluding paragraph: Do you seriously think that such a campaign would be funded by taxpayers' money?? Note that we have just been reminded that there are no public funds for a long overdue sexual health policy! So you can rest assured that this campaign was privately fund. And that is the pity. We seem to forget that hundreds of taxpayers head same-sex families who remain in limbo while their tax money goes to finance other families and other causes, including anti-same-sex-families propanganda. The taxpayers' money argument is really the wrong tree to bark up in this case!
Joe Xuereb (5 days, 23 hours ago)
2) As humans we inherit this terrible legacy, the demon we have to deal with all our lives. It's called the animal instinct that is our sexuality - a very necessary 'evil' for the species to survive. It transcends gender and orientation. We are all in it, all in the same boat. Even J.Muscat and Micallef what's-his-name. And Franco of course. And myself. And presidents and prelates. No way out. Of course many seek consolation through holy books and pamphlets. And live in denial. At a terrible price. Not least scapegoating homosexuals, and women, and foreigners, and other religions, and their wives/husbands. It's called denial. Marxism lives. And Pandora's box, once opened, the contents therein must to be examined. And dealt with. What an ill-chosen title for an article. Nothing to do with me. I can only sit back and laugh at man's folly. His name may as well be Pan d'Oro - dark and foreboding.
I know who I am and I am well pleased. Thanks to my work on myself. Certainly not unhappy society's and its unhappy, self-seeking members. Who would like to find themselves but know not where to start. So they scapegoat instead. Altogether - Ahhhh!!!!!
Joe Xuereb (5 days, 23 hours ago)
1) I read elsewhere that the PL was castigated for creating an LGBT section the rationale being that LGBT people are mainstream. But are they? No they are not. If we - I say this as a homosexual with a big axe to grind - are lumped together with mainstream electorate, congregation, etc. then we become/remain, invisible. If we belong to a separate section, then we are visible. We are a strength to be reckoned with. We are here. And we're staying. And anybody who sympathises with J.Muscat's take on the matter had better ask themselves, what do THEY think of homosexuality. If you are married, childless and paying taxes, that is hardly my fault. You think I don't pay taxes for other people's shambolic marriages and dysfunctional offspring? We all have to deal with whatever nature throws at us. Get to grips with reality. And get over it. And move on.
Long experience has thought me that mainstream society finds homosexuality disgusting. Because it's just too different. Homosexuals are scapegoated. Anyone who feels revulsion at what is natural to me had better look at the state of THEIR personal lives. Not a pretty sight from what I understand.
continued1)
Franco Farrugia (6 days, 11 hours ago)
You call MY letter 'morose'? Just because I showed how conversant you are in things European? You don't have any idea what the EU institutions are and you persist not only in your errors but in your disgusting messages that you share with Josie Muscat.
And I don't need to answer any of your questions: take a course in EU studies and all will be revealed.
John Spiteri - General Secretary AN (6 days, 16 hours ago)
@Franco Farrugia.

For your information, i sent a response to the Malta Independent on Friday 6th November 2009 as a right of reply. It is not my fault if they are yet to publish it.

You are not correct when you say that the ECHR has nothing to do with the EU, for had you bothered to read the fundamental charter of rights you would no otherwise. Let me quote from the said charter:

“This Charter reaffirms, with due regard for the powers and tasks of the Union and for the principle of subsidiarity, the rights as they result, in particular, from the constitutional traditions and international obligations common to the Member States, the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the Social Charters adopted by the Union and by the Council of Europe and the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and of the European Court of Human Rights”

EHCR case-law will be considered case-law by EU institutions including ECJ.

QED

My reply to your morose letter is printed in full here:
http://www.centrulemin.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=640&catid=36&Itemid=152

perhaps you will care to answer my questions.
V. Aquilina (6 days, 16 hours ago)
Although unfortunately we already have many damaging social problems, I feel that we would be aggravating the situation if we continue to shed the values that formed our society.

Let us make our effort to support measures which enhance the values of work and family unity.

Let us keep Zapatero's misguided legislation away from our country!
wally vella-zarb (6 days, 18 hours ago)
@ E,Muscat:

Stating that "Dr.Josie Muscat is right that the Labour Party is trying to garner votes from minorities" does not mean much. Most of what ALL the parties do is precisely with that aim in mind: to garner votes from minorities, to the maximum possible. That simplistic stance may even be extended, if you will, to Dr Josie's own party by stating that it was set up to ride the bandwagon of anti-illegal immigrant sentiment that is ever gaining momentum.

Whether one agrees or not, the Labour Party has deemed it necessary to set up a specific section for LGBT people; the motivation is immaterial. The LGBT section now exists; it does not deprive anyone else of any rights, real or perceived. If you don't identify with that group, fine; just don't enroll in that section.
E.Muscat (6 days, 20 hours ago)
@wally vella zarb:it is well and good that the political parties have a women's and a youth 's section but it would be wrong to divide further (such as having a lesbian section in the women's section or a homosexual/lesbian section in the youth's):people should not be classified according to their sexual orientation.
Dr.Josie Muscat is right that the labour party is trying to garner votes from minorities as in fact has been happening in Spain(acceptance of gay "marriage",gay adoption,abortion,etc) and the UK(3 million immigrants since 2001 to keep the tories out!).We might even see an immigrant section since apparently even a well known trade union is considering one.
Where will all this lead us?: to the majority of maltese having to fight for their democratic rightsand their christianity .
wally vella-zarb (6 days, 21 hours ago)
By largely the same 'logic' the parties ought to dismantle their sections for women and for youth on the grounds that even they may be construed as being 'discriminatory'. While we're at it, why not also do away with the parties themselves since they are, by their very nature, 'divisive'? Perhaps this too makes sense to Dr Josie...?
JCMICALLEF (6 days, 21 hours ago)
@franco farrugia - then we must be saying the same things using different words, as I agree with most of what you just said.

what we need in this country perhaps is enough maturity to accept everyone for what/who he is and for what s/he can do.

yes, I am a taxpayer too, and i am fed up paying for the 'benefits' of those who choose to lead a passive life. but i do not think twice about helping those truly in need.

as for myself as a married person with no kids, I see that I fork out in taxes much more than I will ever get back. Moreover, ppl with kids at work 'enjoy' many more 'benefits' than myself, to start with. Perhaps that's a positive descrimination after all!!

The fact that everyone should be the same before the law is somehting I've been arguing for ages. But it's not and probably never will be.

All the best.

JCM
Joseph Vella (6 days, 21 hours ago)

Of course we need an LGBT section in Labour because IGNORANT and INTOLERANT people are causing homophobia in our "democratic" country. The only reason for setting up this group is to create discussion within a progressive party which is hoping to govern this country. The LGBT community pays taxes like everyone does, (probably makes use of your hospitals as well!) and is giving important contribution to our country so it doesn't deserve any less.
I am a proud Christian, I am a proud Maltese citizen and I do believe a liberal economy...(so I don't think that does make me a socialist or a Marxist but yes it does make me a LABOURITE).

Thankfully a very small proportion in Malta share your ideas.

Franco Farrugia (6 days, 22 hours ago)
@ JCMIcallef: I never said that positive discrimination is good and kindly do not put words into my mouth. And I do not, no, agree with such 'benefits' and 'rights' because we all pay our taxes and the State should be lay - hence, everyone is equal in the eyes of the law ... which is an ass, as we know.
jcmicallef (6 days, 23 hours ago)
@franco farrugia - perhaps you may wish to inform us of the existing positive dicimination and how these lobbying groups can solve such a situation.

I am against all sort of discrimination. I've interviewed scores of people in my working career and have employed all sorts - as long as they could do the job well enough. But that is just one example.

Of course, for you, perhaps, that heterosexual and married couples should have 'benefits' or 'rights' is discrimination.

Franco Farrugia (6 days, 23 hours ago)
And what is this Alleanza anyway? How can we even bother listening to what they have to say about the Lisbon Strategy IF THEY CAN'T EVEN MAKE OUT WHERE THE EUROPEAN INSTITUTIONS ARE, ANYWAY? The other day in another English-language newspaper, I took the Secretary General of AN to task over such mistakes as making out that it was the COJ of the EU that issued the decree on crucifixes. He didn't have the guts to write back to rectify his error. What do you expect from right-wingers?
Anyway, let's continue hugging the crucifixes on the walls, keep them there, at the same time trying our best to nail down any neighbour swho don't live the way we want them to do!
Franco Farrugia (1 week ago)
@ JC Micallef - Well, I have news for you: we DO have 'positive discrimination' in other areas, so, what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Or not? When it suits us, we want discrimination, when it doesn't suit us, we don't. It's about time we made up our minds.
JCMicallef (1 week ago)
I am glad to read Dr. Muscat's contribution.

I hope others that share the same beliefs speak up as well.

Last thing we need is 'positive discrimination' - being unable to refuse a member of some lobbying group as it would make you look like you are making a discrimination against him/her.

Franco Farrugia (1 week ago)
@ Dr Josie Muscat: 'bestowing extra rights on real or imaginary victim groups' ... 'these alien, undemocratic and unchristian tenets will be imposed on us' ... what are you on about, man? It is so disgusting to read these words coming from a man who makes out to be one of the more intelligent people - and accomplished! - on the islands! You speak like that because you don't have a son or daughter who are part of some 'imaginary victim group' or you would sing a different song, as you did with the building of Eden Foundation, which was spurred on by a personal event that was close to you! Shame on you, Josie!

Poll

Was the budget good for Malta?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku