Trapping seminar irks hunters
An international seminar on bird trapping on Wednesday was being organised to "unjustly tarnish Malta and the Maltese internationally", the Federation for Hunting and Conservation said.
A Belgian ex-trapper, who shifted his hobby to captive finch breeding when Belgium banned finch trapping, will share his experience with the audience. Alternatives to bird trapping, finch migration and populations in the central Mediterranean islands, law enforcement relating to trapping and the legal situation on trapping in other EU member states would also be discussed, the seminar organisers said.
Organised by the EU LIFE+ Project on Bird Migration and Trapping, the seminar will be addressed by Bruno Massa from the University of Palermo and Patrick Wegerdt from the European Commission's Infringements Unit.
The hunters' federation said the seminar, to be held at St James Cavalier in Valletta, was part of the LIFE+ EU-funded anti-finch trapping project, the aim of which was to abolish the traditional socio-cultural passion of finch capturing, practised by thousands of Maltese.
But BirdLife Malta campaigns coordinator Geoffrey Saliba said the project did not aim to abolish finch trapping as this was already banned in Malta in line with the EU Accession Treaty agreement.
"This ban naturally created frustration among Maltese trappers as the reason behind it was not communicated to trappers by the Maltese government during the five-year phasing out period for the trapping of seven finch species," he said.
The federation said that, for the first time in the history of the Maltese Islands, the traditional socio-cultural passion of finch capturing, practised by thousands of enthusiasts, was not permitted this autumn.
It said the government took this step notwithstanding the fact that even the EU Accession Treaty specified that finch capturing could continue in a limited form after December 31, 2008 and the European Commission Representation in Malta last March publicly declared that Malta could, along with all other member states, apply a derogation to allow trapping to continue.
"Why should both the EU Commission and the government, which takes the final decision on what LIFE+ projects are selected in Malta, contribute public funds to abolish a practice the same government has opted not to allow this year anyway, despite the fact that EU regulations permit it through the application of a derogation?
"And, to add insult to injury, Malta's main negotiator over hunting and trapping in the run-up to EU membership is also involved in this campaign against trapping," it said.
The federation said that, just as it did in the case of traditional spring hunting, it would step up its efforts in favour of traditional and sustainable finch capturing.
It was aware that the government, through the Malta Environment and Planning Authority, had agreed to contribute €30,000 towards the project, on condition that trappers participated.
"As far as can be ascertained, this condition has not been met and Mepa has, therefore, refused to pay up," the hunters' federation said. For this reason, it refused an invitation to participate in the seminar.
Those interested in attending can book by calling BirdLife on 2134 7644/5.
7 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
V Falzon
Nov 9th 2009, 20:03
Thank God for the ban on finch trapping. Yesterday I saw four greenfinches, five linnets and 25 chaffinches, all in the space of an hour's walk. Mind you, this time last year I could hear many more, but alas they were all hopping about in tiny cages set around the infernal trapping sites. May the ban last forever.
r sammut
Nov 9th 2009, 19:27
@C Mallia About what agreement is the tantrum you are referring to? Why Malta need sign any termination of trapping when trapping is possible by derogation in other countries of the EU? Or is it this not the same EU we are mentioning here?
C Mallia
Nov 9th 2009, 17:09
This is just another public tantrum by FKNK. Malta signed this agreement about finch trapping prior to the EU referendum, so can these people for once respect agreements.
Jesmond Micallef
Nov 9th 2009, 14:27
What about the vast collections of birds locked up in Europes Zoos for example !!!
Ing.Bernard Farrugia
Nov 9th 2009, 12:12
Good one Mr.Camilleri. Not mentioning that also some parts in Italy can legally shoot finches such as the Hawfinch (Taz-Zebbug) and the Chaffinch (Sponsun)!
MARK MIFSUD BONNICI
Nov 9th 2009, 11:59
Can Birdlife, Government or the EU commission reply why Malta signed an agreement regarding a 5 year transition period for the trapping of finches?
The European Commission Representation in Malta last March publicly declared that Malta could, along with all other member states, apply a derogation to allow trapping to continue. So why did Malta not apply a derogation rather then agree to a transition period?
If the transition period was negotiated by Malta's P.N appointed advisor, Saviour Balzan, how is it he is now also involved as part of Birdlfie's campaign? Mr. Balzan will benefit from part of the 175,000 Euro EU funds and the possible 30,000 Euro from MEPA? Is this not a blatant conflict of interest?
Birdlife's Godfrey Saliba states "The project did not aim to abolish finch trapping as this was already banned in Malta" also "the reason behind it was not communicated to trappers by the Maltese government "
The Times might want to innvestigate these queries. After all what is being reported shows a clear lack of information towards all the trappers concerned.
Joe Camilleri
Nov 9th 2009, 11:06
Instead of bringing over the belgian ex-trapper, why don't birdlife brings trappers from Spain, Austria, Italy etc to share their experience with the audience since they still continue to trap finches with the blessing of the EU.