• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Court action to be taken against food outlets

Six food business operators found to be contravening food safety legislation by the Department for Environmental Health within the Public Health Regulation Division will be arraigned in court.

These are a hawker from the Mosta Open Market, three operators in Sliema and Valletta, an operator of a food premises in Birkirkara and a business in San Gwann.

The department said that 528 improvement notices were issued. This notice is sent to all food business operators after an unannounced inspection is performed in their establishment by Environmental Health Officers.

The intention is to inform food operators about deficiencies found in their establishments and they are given a specific date to remedy these deficiencies. While deficiencies may vary, when major deficiencies are noted, legal action is taken.

The department said that 17 undertakings were also entered into during the period.

Undertakings are legal agreements between the food business operators and the Health Authority with the former agreeing on deadlines to remedy deficiencies in their premises.

Failure to abide with the agreed deadlines results in court action being initiated. The main deficiencies included structural defects, lack of hygiene, labelling irregularities and lack of food hygiene training.

Over 800 kilogrammes of expired food were sealed by the Health Inspectorate from a store in Birkirkara and subsequently destroyed. Similarly, 43 kilogrammes of expired goods were destroyed in Ħamrun and another four kilogrammes in Mosta. Another 185 kilogrammes of cheese/peacakes and pizza dough were destroyed from a manufacturer in San Gwann.

Ten emergency control orders were issued. These permanent or temporary orders are given to food business operators to stop part of their activities. Nine were issued to suppliers of water intended for human consumption, which following the necessary sampling and analysis, were found not complying with the criteria stipulated in the Water Intended for Human Consumption Regulations, 2009 and the other was served to a person found manufacturing foodstuffs in unlicensed premises.

An emergency prohibition order was served on the operator of premises 247, Carmel Street Birkirkara.

This order is issued when there is an imminent risk to public health and therefore this premises was closed down by the Health Authority.

In this case the order was lifted two days later since the operator abided with the instructions given by the Health Authority and the public health risk was abated.

The Health Inspectorate Services can be contacted on tel 2133 7333 between 7.30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., offices - 37/39, Rue D’Argens, Msida, e-mail complaints.ph@gov.mt .

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

isabella peresso fiorentino (2 weeks, 2 days ago)
Come on please. Let's have their names - it's our right to know.
edward bartolo (2 weeks, 2 days ago)
Quote: "We have a right to know who these food operators are."

What?! You pretend to have the right to harm business?! Money first, then maybe, your health!
GiovDeMartino (2 weeks, 3 days ago)
f you want to have an idea of what food hygiene means go for a walk in the early morning before retail outlets are open. You'll see several cartoon boxes full of all sorts of bread left behind the closed doors of these outlets. The boxes are keft on the ground without any sort of cover and the bread is at the mercy not only of the elements, but the regular visits of dogs, cats and thousands of flying and crawling insects. And when this bread is put inside, it is left uncovered in large trays this time at the mercy of flies and....tens of humans who spend a long time touching and smelling each panina before they decide which one to take.
Jos Vella (2 weeks, 4 days ago)
so, a court hearing of a one person against another person features in the papers with the plaintiffs' names and something serious which can lead to food poisoning hundreds of people goes without mentioning the names of the establishments. This is MALTA.
Mary Francis (2 weeks, 4 days ago)
I say NAME AND SHAME them. Do not pussyfoot round them. If they poison and kill people it is too late. They are making the money and they are responsible for what they do. The autorities in Malta are simply not strict enough.
Joe Cordina (2 weeks, 4 days ago)
Good but not enough, many grocery shops are blatenlty selling expired food stuffs. hawkers exhibit their unsealed food stuff in the sun or near fuming vehicles, etc
W Spencer (2 weeks, 4 days ago)
A few weeks ago, while shopping in a small supermarket, we came across some items that were 3 months out of date. We brought this to an assistants attention, and the items were removed from the shelves.

The next week we shopped at the same place, and behold, the same out of date items were back on the shelves !!!

Stock checks, stock rotation, whats that ???
p abela (2 weeks, 4 days ago)
it is uselss giving us reports without the shop being named. I for one and my daughter at times buy pastizzi and/or dough from the main street in San Gwann. But now definitely these shops wont see my face anymore unless I know who the shop is.. It is our sacrosant right to know especially where health is concerned
M Mifsud (2 weeks, 4 days ago)
We have a right to know who these food operators are. This is not a joke, our health is at stake.
joe vella (2 weeks, 4 days ago)
what is the use of giving out these reports unless the public is warned which outlets are being referred to? The official reply would be discreetness to avoid commercial damage but this does not hold any water since, with the publication of such notices, a lot of gossip is created and the wrong names may be bandied about1 Besides, if I understand correctly, many of these outlets are still allowed to operate until they conform so the risk to the public is still existent!!
eg why was the gozo channel affair kept hush hush, again why mention hotels and not inform the public? Legionnaire's is very serious so if action taken is more concerned to protect a commercial interest, other people can get infected with a very serious malady
if the department does not want to disclose names due to commercial repercussions, then the establishments should be closed down until rectification -- and what about callbacks, are these actioned?
Joseph Schembri (2 weeks, 4 days ago)
So if a man does something naughty with his body and an adult woman sees him our courts become draconian and his name is published and his family probably ruined. On the other hand if a catering outlet or hotel is dishing out food that can kill children or at least make them seriously ill... that establishment remains anonymous.

S Vella (2 weeks, 4 days ago)
Names please!! The public has a right to know where dishonesty and lack of hygiene is to be found...
D Merceica (2 weeks, 4 days ago)
..Still waiting for those six hotels which were found to harbour 'Legionaires Disease' to be named some time ago. Surely this is a case of the publics" right to know.
Anthony C Azzopardi (2 weeks, 4 days ago)
Why not name the six food business operators? We have now had enough of accused, for various contraventions and even misdemeanours, not being named. This is our health which is at stake and we should be made aware of the names of the outlets concerned.
J. Mercieca (2 weeks, 4 days ago)
Keep up the good work. A an effective public health regulator ensures that standards are ensured for the good of the people.

Poll

Was the budget good for Malta?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku