• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Drug smuggler goes free

I was morally wrong but legally correct – Steve Marsden

“Elated”: Steve Marsden leaving prison in Paola, yesterday. Photo: Chris Sant Fournier

Steve Marsden, the 50-year-old Briton jailed for 25 years for conspiring to traffic in 50,000 ecstasy pills, walked out of prison a free man yesterday after he was acquitted by an appeals court.

Admitting he had been “morally wrong” in what he did, he said it still did not justify the time he spent behind bars, much of it in preventive custody.

“I feel like my legs are going to give way. I’m absolutely elated after three and a half years of hell,” he said, standing outside the prison dressed in a black suit and holding his belongings in two bags.

“Now it’s time to start picking up the pieces.”

Last January, Mr Marsden was found guilty of conspiring to import ecstasy even though the pills that he had brought into Malta contained a chemical similar to that found in ecstasy but which was legal at the time.

During the trial Mr Marsden maintained that he knew the pills he was transporting were not illegal but the prosecution argued that this was untrue since he did not disclose this information during the police investigation and he had also tried to hide the pills.

The appeal court, made up of Chief Justice Vincent De Gaetano, Mr Justice David Scicluna and Mr Justice Joseph Micallef, yesterday found that there was not enough evidence to prove that Mr Marsden formed part of a conspiracy to import illegal drugs.

They overturned the sentence which had been to import drugs and overturned the sentence handed down by Mr Justice Joseph Galea Debono after the trial by jury.

The prosecution could not prove that at least one of his co-conspirators had illegal drugs in mind and neither could it prove that Mr Marsden thought the pills were illegal.

“I had done my homework and that was proven today. I had checked on the internet from the best source. I always knew they weren’t illegal. I’ve never even experimented with any illegal substances, which makes it even harder to swallow. You play with fire, you get your fingers burnt,” Mr Marsden told The Times.

In 2006 he drove from Spain to Malta with the pills – which contained the chemical mCPP – hidden behind the panels of his Mitsubishi Pajero. He was stopped by the police as he was driving off the Catamaran from Sicily on July 9 after they were tipped off that he would be arriving.

Mr Marsden, who is actually a transporter by profession, insisted that he never intended to sell the pills himself and he was simply transporting them for businessmen registered in Malta.

“Morally I was wrong. I feel bad about that. And it’s not something that will be repeated. It was a grave error of judgment on my part which I very much regret. But I don’t think it justifies three and a half years in prison. I served a five-year sentence for not breaking the law,” he said.

Mr Marsden will fly back to the UK today never, he said, to return to Malta. With tears in his eyes, he said his lawyers would immediately start a civil case against Malta for compensation and lost time.

“I have lost friends who I will never see again,” he said, adding that one of his best friends died of cancer while he was in prison.

Mr Marsden will see his three-year-old granddaughter for the first time today and his first job will be baby-sitting because his daughter has just been diagnosed with Swine Flu.

“But the first thing I will do is have a long gin and tonic,” he said.

As he tasted freedom outside the Corradino Correctional Facility, he said the feeling was strange, daunting and unbelievable.

Just 10 months ago he was facing 25 years in prison and a fine of €60,000 which was to be turned into another 18 months, after a jury found him guilty by eight votes to one.

“I always had faith that I would be released. I believed in my lawyer and in my innocence,” he said.

Mr Marsden’s case had made it to the BBC because Fair Trials International claimed that he was being held for too long before his case was heard.

Talking about the driving habits in Malta, the buses and the slow legal system, Mr Marsden said Malta was in a “time warp”.

He was going to pick up Lm5,000 for the transportation of the pills and had a clean conduct. He had given the names of the two persons who had incited him to do the run together with details about their other business interests, he said.

He had done the job “out of stupidity” and for financial reasons.

However, the prosecution had maintained that the pills would have had a market price of close to €500,000 and would have had an enormous impact on youth and society.

His lawyer Joe Brincat yesterday said that the case raised a number of human rights issues that he intended to pursue. He said that Mr Marsden should not have been kept behind bars for so long before the trial.

Mr Marsden was kept in long preventative detention because he could not afford to pay his bail.

“There is something amiss with our system,” Dr Brincat said.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

P.Zammit (2 weeks, 5 days ago)
@Dr. Rita Miller and Nenu Aquilina

I fail to see your point about cigarettes / Drink vs Hard Drugs.

So, should we be ashmed about this case because we drive cars that spew black death from the pipe. Maybe feel humiliated because power houses give off particles of dust. Maybe bow in shame because we pass gas that could ruin the ozone. Should we say mea culpa that we eat tinned food which have cancer causing agents in them?

What is your point again? If your mum smoked around you. What does this case have to do with that?

At least you should have had the decency to refrain from using lame arguments for families that lost children to hard drugs from merchants like Ms. Marsden. He himself said that he was morally wrong and you stick your neck out calling us, double faced (pot calling kettle black).
If this man wanted to commit suicide or give drugs to his family - no one would've complained. If you smoke and kill yourself, no one complains. and whatever the man who imported fags without paying tax on them gets, has nothing whatsoever in resemblance to this case.
Kevin Zammit (2 weeks, 5 days ago)
Mr. Marsden did his homework all right but only how he was covering his proverbial behind. Pity he did not spend some more effort on researching the chemical side effects of what he was carrying.

Hope those "business men" are looked into as well though ... if its true that is. First time I'm hearing about them.
R.Lewis (2 weeks, 5 days ago)
Well done to Mr Justice Joseph Galea Debono. You seem to be the most intelligent and honest Judge we have in our Judiciary system because your sentences were always according to the public's opinion. The Maltese will for sure side your capability. As for all of us we all know that whenever someone tries to hide something, there must be something wrong. No excuses about technicality, we only care about our children. Thumbs up for Mr Justice Joseph Galea Debono.
Nena Aquilina (2 weeks, 5 days ago)
I am Maltese lived here on and off for 62 years and only know a handful of Maltese who don't subject their children, families and friends to cancer causing cigarette smoke. Maltese people smoke at the local restaurants and bars too. I do not see them being arrested and put behind bars for twenty five years.
What about the Maltese men who got caught smuggling 50,000 cigarettes last week? Will they get the same sentence?
They know, like the rest of us that it is one of the most addictive drugs available and kills more people than any other single cause, not to mention relative diseases it causes like asthma, chronic lung and immune system diseases.
I don't know what this drug does, but I doubt that it is anywhere near as bad as cigarettes and second hand smoke.
we are stuck in a time warp
Mr Eric Soames,Julian Borg,Joe Genovese,Alison...thank you, I take my wig is off for you!
ps. I' am a lung cancer survivor and I never smoked, but my friends and family did.
I'm alive today thanks to the British Dr's, surgeons, chemotherapy staff, and nurses, who took care of me for free.
Dr Rita Miller (2 weeks, 5 days ago)
“Another case of the kettle calling the teapot black,”
Many Maltese smoke cigarettes, a known drug and killer of millions. As with my own Maltese mother, many smoke and drink alcohol while in pregnancy, or in confined spaces attended by others knowing that their cigarette addiction is killing them and everybody around them... Daily, cigarette addicts, break existing laws that state “no-individual will knowingly endanger or put in danger the life and or welfare of a child or other individual, but we do every-time we light up while driving.
Operating a vehicle while smoking is driving while being distracted, just as one is if they’re eating, drinking, text/cell phoning….they’re also subjecting other occupants to cancer causing, life threatening, and addictive elements as they’re themselves, plus the substantially higher risk of an accident claiming more innocent lives.
My points; will the smugglers of forty thousand cigarette receive the same sentence as Mr. Marsden?
Laws/enforcement are based on technicalities, wrong or right.
Biased shoddy court and police-work = a lot of victim compensation, but don’t worry, here on Malta “we can kill an endangered bird with one stone”, pay the compensation owed to Mr. Marsden with a cig-tax! Cough up smokers;^)
V.Brown (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
My son died aged 25 thanks to vermins like you . Human rights are for humans and people like you are not humans but merchants of death .
Jesmond Micallef (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
This mature British adult professional transporter father said that Malta is in a Time Warp. What about your twisted nation called Britain !!! How many youngsters in Britain live on the streets ?? Have you ever been to Bristol ?? What do you call that ?? Jerk !!!

Maltese parents are very protective towards their own off springs, any NORMAL human being can understand that. Have you ever watched any of Sir David Attenbrough TV series about how animals protect their own off springs, from PREDATORS .........!!! May be you should, Sir David was knighted by your Queen for this same purpose, to educate people like yourself.

"NOT MADE IN MALTA" chemical junk ruining Maltese youth. Such deserves so much thought, really......................so much thought.................!!!!!!!

Maltese culture in comparison with others.............WOW what an interesting article that would make here ..........................!!!!!
Eric Soames (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
So many comments! Without trying or wanting to make any excuses for this fellow, I feel that it should be pointed out that there are other reasons for hiding merchandise, such as avoiding customs duty. It could have been a shipment of Viagra - I am willing to bet that some of the commentators themselves would have been happy to save a few bucks if they were in the market for this fine product themselves. Regarding the law, that's all we have and if we don't follow the letter of the law injustices will be more rampant. Remember: 'Better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer,' (William Blackstone).
P.Zammit (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
@Alfred Bugeja.

Totally agree with you. Also one has to see the intent of Mr. Marsden. He plainly did not come to Malta to bring in some paracetamol samples. His intent was to bring in drugs and make a handsome profit. His mechandise was death.

We've seen cases be drawn as guilty based on intent. Letting this man free was a grave insult to the local police force, and an injustice (ce puzza di brucato).
Carmel Ellul (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
The appeals court Hon. Judges should have asked ONE SIMPLE QUESTION.
Would the accused have given the pills he tried to smuggle to his dear nephew?

No further questions from my side.
BUT one comment:
Human rights issues? Whose rights , our youngsters right to live without being hassled with drugs , or the businessmen's rights to peddle drugs with impunity?
Did Mr. Marsten tell who were his clients that were expecting the drugs?
If he did not does this make him a drug pedlar or not?

If one can be morally wrong but legally correct , then the law is an ass.

Alfred Bugeja (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
@Julian Borg

You conveniently overflew the fact that the jury had found this drug mule guilty by a verdict of 8-1. That is practically unanimous. So I have my doubts as to whether the prosecution had failed to produce enough evidence that he knew that he was not smuggling ecstasy. The prosecution had more than convinced the jury about his guilt.

Furthermore, mCCP was a brand new drug at the time - practically unknown in the rest of europe, so it is hard for me to believe that Marsden did even know the difference between it and real ecstasy.

Seems like this was a case of the bigwigs on the appeals court ignoring the verdict of the jury to look for the technicality that set this drug smuggler free. It's a pity that there is no higher court than the Appeals Court to turn this verdict once again.
E. Vassallo (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
Steve Marsden should thank his lucky stars that he was set free. In other places drug smugglers have been put to death. if he had nothing to hide why did he put the illegal substances concealed in the back panel of the van.
Brian cassar (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
l ahbar ixxokjatni.....u nithassar l korp tal puluzija ghax xol li jamlu .....tas sedqa fejnhom ????
Julian Borg (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
The 'legal technicality' cited below as the reason why Marsden was acquitted, happens to be that the drug was NOT ILLEGAL at the time it was imported. Some technicality!

The prosecution claimed that Marsden did not know that the Ecstasy tablets contained mCPP (not illegal) and not MDMA (illegal), and that as far as he was concerned he was smuggling the latter; hence the charge for 'conspiracy'. Yet, by virtue of the "presumption of innocence" (not a technicality!) it was up to the prosecution to bring forward enough EVIDENCE to prove its claim. It did not; therefore Marsden is innocent.....as presumed.

I'm sure that most commentators here have already gone through the 30-page judgment, but just in case some didn't, here's the link:

http://www2.justice.gov.mt/sentenzi/judgm_judgement.asp?FrmJudgementID=57508&FP=1&FS=1&go=0&lng=ENG
G.Pisani (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
So this guy tried and got RED handed importing these pills and got arrested. He is now a free man and now wants to sue Malta? So he tried to help damage the youth society and now he wants to get paid for it, from the Maltese tax payer!. Go home Mr.Marsden and never come back.
g.c.Forte (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
technicality my foot.......................@ j. Caruana......very well said.
Anna Lisa Grech (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
Mr Marsden said that he had done the job for financial reasons. Well most of us go to work every morning for financial reasons and not try to get rich quickly by risking the lives of other people. He also said that friends of his had died while he was in prison. Does he know how many young people have died because of an overdose while he was in prison?

Think about it Mr Marsden before stating calmly that you were morally wrong but legally correct and playing the victim. If you know that you were morally wrong, how can you possibly think about starting a civil case against Malta for keeping you behind bars for three and half years? At least show some regret of what damage you could have done to Maltese families!
Louis Borg (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
Unbeleivable, just unbeleivable. I just can't understand our courts and laws, as if the intention was not there.
amifsud (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
"Talking about the driving habits in Malta, the buses and the slow legal system, Mr Marsden said Malta was in a “time warp”."

What has this got to do with anything in this story. Why do we have to know what this dubious character thinks of our driving habits?
Carlo Laurenti (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
This ex-convict was set free merely on a technicality which was nothing more than a failure of the local legal system. Let it be clearly reminded that according to the reports, the police did find a considerable number of pills hidden in his vehicle, so hats off to the cops, well done guys.

Personally I find it extrodinarly difficult to feel any pity for this person having spent 3 years in jail! He is no victim, but just very lucky! Hope he won't be as lucky again in his life....he definitely does not deserve it!
Manuel Scicluna (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
His intentions were clearly criminal as a matter of fact he tried to hide the pills. 50000 pills were not ecstasy but mCPP which give similar effects. 'M'ghadiex mill bieb ghadda mit tieqa'. Good luck!!! Try your luck again with our judicial system.
j caruana (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
Dear Mr Marsden I wish you one thing.

That your dear grand daughther will not FALL VICTIM TO sellfish people like yOU who careless about the mess AND pain AND sUUFERING they create when they import such DRUGS .

I wish you grand daughther lives a happy life away from drugs so you can enjoy her for tHE rest of your days .

you may be free but what you did will haunt for the rest of your life.
THINK OF THIS WHEN YOU LOOK YOUR GRAND DAUGHTHER IN HER EYES.
wHEN YOU LOOK IN THE EYES OF INNOCENCE.

WHAT A SAD DAY FOR MALTESE JUSTICE
G.Debono (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
@Marsden

I do hope your own grand daughter does not end up a vicitim of substances brought to the UK out of morally wrong (selfish) people like you. To me you were acquitted, not because you are innocent, but because of a legal technicality. You are as guilty as the people you import pure cocaine and murder own children.
Joe Genovese (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
" this aquittal is due to a legal technicality.... this "ecstasy type" drug of abuse had not been added to the list of our controlled drugs.
@ Dr Francis Saliba

A legal technicality that made a bigger ass of the law than it already is.

Was it sheer coincidence that the man knew before coming out here that the "drug" was not on the list? For if one assumes that he lied when he said he ran a check on whether the coast was clear (in a manner of speaking), what other explanation could there be?

It was the ineptitude of whoever drew up that list----at public purse expense---- if the drug is considered harmful to merit inclusion.

This brings to mind the incident about that Swiss TV reporter who had a small quantity of marijuana, barely enough for personal use, and got a six-month stretch because of the asinine wording and interpretation of the law.

What Malta got was a stream of bad publicity and no doubt that is what she'll be getting again.

And deservedly so....thanks to our exalted Public Officials.

And who is going to pick up the tab? The tax-paying patsy.
Alex Caffary (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
The reason most people in Malta believe that soft drugs lead to hard drugs is that there is clearly no difference in the law. Therefore why not have a hit of cocaine instead of a puff of cannabis if the penalty is the same. More reward for the same risk in simplistic terms. Youth do not ever believe that they will be hooked on anything. It is "Always" the last time, but it never is especially when it is an addictive substance. Cannabis is NOT addictive. Go ahead and research it yourself... but cocaine and such are. With that in mind, what deters youth from trying all the drugs available? You know they have to try one. It's a fact of life. So if this is the case, lets change the laws so they only try the soft non-addictive drugs.
I also agree with C.Borg's view on this. No politician should be making these decisions. Let's get the experts in.
Alex Caffary (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
Malta's legal system certainly needs to be revamped when you see youth jailed for half their adulthood simply for having possession of cannabis (less hamful to the body and mind than all the chemicals found in cigarettes), while a person gets a "get out of jail free" card after attempting to smuggle in 50,000 ecstacy pills that destroy minds, bodies, lives and families.
In other countries (take your pick), harder drugs yield harder sentences. Cannabis is just a fine and a slap on the wrist for the first time and up to 6 months jail for subsequent offences, while cocaine and other socially destructive substances will get you a bare minimum of 2 years jail.
ray sacco (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
one question for mr. marsden: since you are unaware of the danger of the drugs you were carrying, will you be giving some to your three year old grand daughter?
ray sacco (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
so our judges decided that there was no proof of intentional conspiration and that the accused was unaware that the drugs were illegal!!!!!!!! so why did he hide them? why all that amount of pills? common sense was enough to proof the accused intentons, but this virtue seems to be lost in our courts! and with arrogance, mr. marsden is filing a case against malta for the lost time. oh how many good deeds would he have done in that lost time!
C.Borg (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
This should be the final tip that Malta needs an extreeme make over in its drug laws! First of all we need to do an urgent update on the drugs available on the market! Some new designer lethal drugs are available and not listed. This is not acceptable!
Also, drugs should be classified according to the damage they do to the human being. And this should be concluded by experts and not any other Know All Politician!! It is crazy that some god given plant is classified with some keroseen derived cocaine which is lethal to the whole system! And what about the dealers....who tempt people to try every drug since they are considered the same in our legal system. Then we look surprised that corpses are being found in the middle of the streets! If the law is the same...the dealer's choice would be something that is highly addictive so his income is guaranteed all the time a craving kicks in! It s about time we deal with the real problem. The death of our youth!!!! The hard drugs that are widely available and consumed!!
Raymond Sammut (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
@ Steve Marsden -- “Morally I was wrong. I feel bad about that. And it’s not something that will be repeated. It was a grave error of judgment on my part which I very much regret. But I don’t think it justifies three and a half years in prison."

Why not justified, Mr Marsden? It took you three and a half years in jail to work out that you were morally wrong. Had you collected your 5K Liri without being picked up by the Malta Customs, it would have been business as usual for you, and hell for hundreds of parents on Malta.
Paul Barrett (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
The good news is that these (now illegal) drugs did not get into the market and the better news is that he does not ever plan to return to Malta.
The bad news is that he got free food and lodging for some three years which we paid for.
Legally he is innocent, morally he is guilty.
GBartolo (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
“I have lost friends who I will never see again,” he said, adding that one of his best friends died of cancer while he was in prison. - Who cares!!What about the lives of the Maltese sons and daughters you would have altered should these 50000 pills had made it to the streets, the truth of the matter is that you have been set free on a technicality .
Dr Francis Saliba (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
Before indulging in an orgy of congratulations it is wise to point out that this aquittal is due to a legal technicality namely this "ecstasy type" drug of abuse had not been added to the list of our controlled drugs.
Eric Soames (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
His story could wind up on the National Geographic Channel series Locked Up Abroad. Good going, oh over-zealous ones!
Paul Farrugia (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
A guy who tried to smuggle in our country 50,000 mind altering pills and we ask him his opinion about our transport system – we are truly unique !!!
Alison Grima (2 weeks, 6 days ago)
Enjoy your life Mr. Marsden! I am very happy for you.

Poll

Was the budget good for Malta?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku