
Tuesday, 3rd November 2009 - 16:30CET
Updated: Czech President Klaus signs Lisbon Treaty
(Adds details, minister, PN, PL statements)
Czech President Vaclav Klaus signed the EU's Lisbon Treaty today, bringing into force the EU's plan to overhaul its institutions and win a greater role on the world stage.
Klaus was the last EU leader to ratify the treaty and his signature means the bloc of nearly half a billion people can pick its first president and a more powerful foreign representative to speak for it in global affairs.
The treaty is aimed at giving the EU a bigger clout on the world scene and making it more flexible. This is intended to match the rise of emerging powers such as China.
The staunchly eurosceptic Czech president signed the pact after the country's Constitutional Court threw out a complaint against the treaty earlier today.
"I had expected the court ruling and I respect it, although I fundamentally disagree with its content and justification," Klaus told reporters. "I signed the Lisbon Treaty today at 1500 (local time)," he said.
Klaus had been banned by law from signing the treaty until the court had ruled on a complaint by his allies in the Czech upper house of parliament, the Senate, who argued the treaty would erode national sovereignty.
ARGUMENTS REJECTED
The court rejected the arguments. "The judgment was unanimous; none of the judges filed a dissenting opinion to either the judgment or its reasoning," the court said in a written verdict.
The Czech parliament has approved the pact but Klaus long argued against it, saying it would turn the EU into a superstate with little democratic control.
"With the Lisbon Treaty taking effect, the Czech Republic will cease to be a sovereign state, despite the political opinion of the Constitutional Court," Klaus said.
Klaus had said he would raise no further obstacles to the document after EU leaders agreed last week to give the Czechs an opt-out from a rights charter attached to the treaty. Klaus says the exemption is necessary to avoid property claims by Germans expelled from Czechoslovakia after World War Two.
"It is now time surely that the European Union moves on, not talking about the institutional arrangements for years ahead, but talking about the vital problems that all of us face," British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said after the court ruling.
"And that is creating jobs, creating growth, building a safer and more secure environment and building greater security for European people."
After Klaus's signature, the treaty will come into force probably in December, turning attention to who will be the EU's first president.
EU leaders failed to agree at a summit last week in Brussels on who should take the job, whose powers are still somewhat unclear, and a special summit may be needed to reach a deal.
The chances of the once-favoured candidate, former British prime minister Tony Blair, seem doomed after he failed to win an endorsement from the European Socialists, his Labour Party's allies.
No front-runner has emerged, but possible contenders include Dutch Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende, former Finnish prime minister Paavo Lipponen and Luxembourg Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker.
FOREIGN MINISTER'S STATEMENT
Foreign Minister Tonio Borg welcomed the ruling of the Czech constitutional court which cleared the path for the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty in the Czech Republic.
"This is a good day for Europe," he said,
"I assume that now the ratification process in the Czech Republic will be completed quickly. Europe needs the Lisbon Treaty to gain, at last, a new capability to act.
"It is high time to leave the discussion on internal reform behind us. Now the task at hand is shaping good, specific policies for the benefit of Europe’s citizens on the basis of the new treaty,” Dr Borg said.
PN STATEMENT
The Nationalist Party welcomed the approval of the treaty by all EU countries saying that the treaty would give Malta the sixth seat in the European Parliament. This, it said, was an important acquisition for which the PN had always worked hard and which would strengthen Malta's representation in the EP and in committees which focused on important sectors for the country.
The treaty also meant that there was to be a commissioner for all member states on an indefinite basis. Through the treaty, decisions would be taken faster and more effectively.
PL STATEMENT
The Labour Party said the signing of the treaty by the Czech Prime MInister should bring to an end a period of uncertainety in the history of European Union development. The party hoped there would be no more stumbling blocks and that the treaty would come into effect in the shortest time possible.
The PL said the treaty gave Malta the sixth seat in the EP which was to be filled by Labour's Joseph Cuschieri.
Now that the treaty was signed, all members states and European institutions should focus more on the Union's economic, environmental and social problems.







RSS
Comments
Dear Frans, who are the “We”? The Labour Party members in Parliament joined the government side and voted for this Treaty! So if what I am thinking eventually takes place both political Parties are to blame. With Malta as a Member of the EU, our representatives were in time to make a difference and identify what could have been improved in the Treaty, but our negotiators were blinded with the sixth seat. I would have expected our representatives to join forces with other relatively small states and insist in safeguarding the consensus rule.
It is now too late because both Parties agreed – possibly for different reasons – when instead they could have acted in Malta’s interests for a better deal. I do not underestimate the difficulties of negotiating with the other 26 EU members, but after the successful accession negotiations I would have expected an effort to retain what we had gained!
The opt out of the Right Charter is something that the whole of the EU should be worried about. This has started as a Human Rights Charter, of late the word `Human` seem to have dropped out of it, one wonders why. We as EU citizens supposed to become one people under one President, yet the said Charter will stop the Germans claim back property that once belong to them before they where expelled from the Czech Republic. If this is something that the EU is happy about, I don`t know what the future will hold.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OvsVSWB4TI
BACK to Colonialism !!
I know exactly how you must be feeingl. We are dying to say, "Told you so!" But to what purpose now?
Is the Labour Party in favour of the Lisbon Treaty because of its new “withdrawal” clause? Does the current leader have the same views as his predecessor on this issue?
What are we going to do when the EU takes a decision by a “relative majority” ignoring completely Malta’s national interest? Malta’s sixth seat is a negligible consolation prize in return for losing our voice at the table where consensus is no longer required.
I was taught that the EU’s flexibility was more useful for small states than a rigid structure. I hope that I am wrong, but we may be moving to a two-track EU – one for the large states that are in a position to wield power, and one for smaller states that will not be in a position to look after their own interests when they are in a minority.
Why is the new decision-making system not explained to the public? Let us hope that we shall not become second-class EU citizens.
You couldn't have choosen a better set of words to gist the situation we have now in our country. MLPN for once are marching hand in hand in favour of the lisbon treaty (treath), all they care about is the sixth seat. Now we will have the president of the European Union to dictate his will to us common mortals., my guess is that all future presidents will be non Maltese seeing how we are treated in brussels. One question which comes to mind is should we keep appointing a President of Malta anymore?
Ever donned on you and the other Gloom and Doom crowd that perhaps one of the moving forces that drove the PN to join the EU so that the atrocities of the '70's and the early '80's never take place again in Malta.
The PN need no lesson from anyone when it comes to Human rights and the Dignity of working man. The PN gave workers real productive work and not "Korpi tax-Xoghol" where the right to strike was taken away from them.
In regards to standard of living, these days I do not witness flock of Maltese going to Sicily to buy the necessities of life from there, but rather the flock of Maltese I see flocking to Sicily these days is for the purpose to spend some relaxing days with their families.
In regards to Bulgaria, Poland and other former Soviet block countries, it was your Party that wanted Malta to emulate them in the past and not the PN. I ma suprise that yuu did not mention Romania by name either.
The truth of the whole story is one, the Maltese don't care about their country. We have our country in four billion debt, badly run governments from both sides, immigrants replacing Maltese and now we gave up our independence.
A federal state is the only option left because it has become impossible to have basic reason or respect for our national law.
Being an EU member means working to ensure that our standard of living is equal, human rights, consumer protection and other important issues are equal, as a minimum, to that of the other EU members – and here I am referring to countries such as France, Germany, The Netherlands etc., not Bulgaria, Poland etc.
Instead of working towards those high standards, we are continually being embarrassed by an incompetent PN Government that has left Malta trailing in most sectors.
Prior to the Irish and subsequently the Czechs signed the Lisbon Treaty, There must had been someone who negotiated on behalf of Malta in formulating the Lisbon Treaty. Yes and that was a Nationalist Party in Government and not some Johnny-come-lately.
Is-shubija ta’ Malta fl-UE u fiz-zona ewro, kien pass storiku ghal pajjizna. Il-Partit Nazzjonalista, flimkien mal-poplu Malti, kien il-protagonist ewlieni biex dan il-pass storiku jsehh. Il-PN hu kburi li llum il-pajjiz irnexxilu jilhaq kunsens nazzjonali dwar il-beneficcju tas-shubija u llum l-Ewropa saret fattur li jghaqqadna.
Quddiem l-isfidi ta’ ricessjoni internazzjonali l-konsegwenzi kienu jkunu gravi li kienu pajjizna baqa’ barra mill-UE u miz-zona ewro. Is-shubija ta’ Malta fl-UE hi ghodda ewlenija ghal holqien tax-xoghol.
Is-shubija fethitilna berah l-orizzonti godda u wiesgha li ma kellniex qabel. It-Trattat ta’ Lisbona se jkompli jsahhah ir-rwol ta’ Malta fl-UE filwaqt li hu pass iehor importanti biex l-UE tkun aktar vicin in-nies.
Il-Partit Nazzjonalista jhares lejn il-gejjieni tal-U.E. b’fiducja li pajjizna se jkompli jsarraf is-shubija tieghu fl-UE f’success u opportunitajiet filwaqt li Malta tkompli ssahhah il-vuci taghha f’ Ewropa aktar b’sahhitha u effettiva fil-hidma taghha.
Frank Psaila
Direttur Informazzjoni, PN