The right National Day for Malta
For some reason only known to Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi, the topic of which should be the one and only National Day in Malta has come up yet again.
It is enlightening to note that he should have brought it up on the eve of another Independence Day. I remember the time when Independence Day could not be celebrated in style; on the contrary, it was always a time of violence and bloodshed when Labourite supporters never allowed Nationalists to celebrate this day as it should have been. I still remember the photo in the newspapers of Guido de Marco, who had just been violently attacked and had a bandage on his head, with his leader, Giorgio Borg Olivier.
Dom Mintoff tried his best to make us forget all about Independence Day, to the point that this occasion was "celebrated" on a normal working-day! Such was the state of things in those times.
Today, we celebrate not one but five national feast-days: June 7 (why people still refer to it in the Italian Sette Giugno beats me; yet another reason showing how "un-national" this day would be!); Independence Day (September 21), Freedom Day (March 31), Victory Day (September 8) and Republic Day (December 13).
I have no qualms in immediately dismissing June 7 from the list of possible singular national days simply because there is nothing "national" about it; just an uprising of a group of people against the British authorities that went tragically wrong.
Now comes the question: Would there have been Republic Day and, consequently, Freedom Day without Independence Day? I know independence in Malta had its limitations: Elizabeth II continued to be our Queen (But does that mean that Australia is not Independent or any other Commonwealth country, for that matter?); most prominent buildings and properties in Malta continued to be out of bounds to Maltese citizens and were the headquarters of the British authorities; the Maltese continued to have a British Governor-General chosen by the British monarch - a very serious omission of Dr Borg Olivier, if you ask me, and a feather in Mr Mintoff's cap to have a Maltese Governor-General.
However, Malta did become an independent state and that is a fact nobody can deny. Therefore, according to my way of thinking, of all the national days we presently have bar September 8, Independence Day appears to be the first choice for National Day and the National Day that we should be celebrating.
There is, however, a big however. As in everything that has to do with the term "national", agreement on a National Day simply cannot be imposed on the people; it has to be accepted and here I am echoing the wise words of Prof. de Marco. Similar to language, you simply cannot decide on behalf of the people. Language changes have to be accepted by the people in their daily usage as, otherwise, such changes will remain in the grammar-books.
Likewise, agreement on a National Day cannot be simplified or corrupted by some sort of package-agreement between the party in government and the party in opposition. Neither should it be the case of a government with a wafer-thin majority trying to impose its will on an opposition, which, as time goes by, is fast being recognised as a government-in-waiting (albeit undeservedly and totally unprepared!) by all and sundry.
Not only that, but the Nationalist Party has not been too kind to Independence Day by constantly and gleefully celebrating it alone, year in, year out, thus making it appear as if it were the party's symbol. One might remark that it is only celebrated by the PN due to incidents taking place in recent history.
On the other hand, it is very remiss of the PL to ignore Independence Day and not treating it with the respect it deserves or, at least, recognising its significance. But that is the PL all over: It never recognises anything achieved by the PN and that, in itself, is a great negative point it has and will continue carry. I won't say anything about Mr Mintoff; we have been there and back! Karmenu Mifsud Bonnici I will choose to ignore but Alfred Sant and, certainly, Joseph Muscat were and are the kind of people I would have imagined would drive their party - as leaders - to give Independence Day at least what it truly deserved! Alas, this was not to be.
All this convinces me that Independence Day can never become a real National Day. And this, to my mind, is unfortunate.
That leaves us with one possibility: September 8, Victory Day. I feel, and believe, along with Kenneth Zammit Tabona, that this day should be the one and only National Day. Firstly, it has always been celebrated by all the Maltese as a National Day, prior to Independence Day. Secondly, there would have been no Independence Day were it not for Victory Day.
Victory Day is, if you want, the "mother" of all national days. It is certainly the senior one, historically speaking. Malta has been through a lot and its history is rife with sieges, plundering, invasions, what-have-you. And Victory Day, to my mind, celebrates all these. It is a very traditional day in our young republic and it is worth bringing the Maltese people together on this National Day, which has no other contestant in the unity it brings with it.
Thirdly, it happens to be well-placed in the Maltese calendar, quite unlike all other national days, and very easy to celebrate. The traditions are all there and have been written in stone by time and not by circumstances and political muscle-flexing. I, therefore, echo what many people are saying and give my vote for September 8 as the true, unifying and singular Nation Day for Malta.
12 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Antoine Vella
Oct 30th 2009, 19:19
Franco Farrugia "Secondly, there would have been no Independence Day were it not for Victory Day." Why, ever not? Don't tell me that you're one of the Malta-saved-the-world-again brigade. I can't believe that someone who claims to be civilised should be insisting to celebrate a bloody battle as National Day rather than a peaceful achievement like Independence. In any case, why go back 70 years? We should look forward not backwards and therefore should celebrate a future event rather than a past one.
Franco Farrugia
Oct 30th 2009, 18:30
@ Antoine Vella: If you re-read your History books, you will find that September 8 does not ONLY celebrate the Great Siege! @ Joseph Meli: Who ever told you that Malta was never a sovereign state prior to 1964? Again, re-read your History books. Then, you suddenly dismiss September 21 in favour of ...... Republic Day. Without so much as a reason that led you to do so. There is absolutely no way one can prefer Republic Day over Independence Day; where it not for the latter, there would not have been the former. We mustn't think in terms of partisan politics, you know, Mr Meli.
Joseph M. Meli
Oct 30th 2009, 11:26
ALL dates prior 00:00:01 of September 21st, 1964 CANNOT be taken into consideration for ONE simple and irrefutable reason, being, Malta was NOT Sovreign but was property of third parties.
These were :
British Crown Colony - from midnight of September 20th, 1964 to 1814 (Treaty of Paris);
Spanish Crown Possession - 1283 to 1798 (in the course of these years Malta was given in fief to various persons, the last being the Order of the Hospital of St John in Jersusalem);
The Angevins held the Maltese Islands from 1283 - 1266;
The Swabians grip on Malta lasted longer from 1266 - 1194;
Roger of Hautville (Count Roger) took Malta from the Arabs in 1090 and the Normans held on to Malta to 1194;
The Arabs invaded the Maltese Islands in 870 until "expelled" by Roger of Haultville;
In 218 BCE the people who inhabited the Maltese Islands opted to join the Roman Republic and this state of affairs lasted till 870 of our Era.
ANY date from September 21, 1964 to any day in the future is a candidate of being Malta's National Day.
I opt for December 13th 1975 - when Malta became a Republic.
Antoine Vella
Oct 30th 2009, 08:51
We don't have enough islamophobia in Malta, this is what we need: a National Day celebrating a 400 year old victory over the 'infidel'.
If we can't agree on a date then, then let us have November 13 as our National Day.
Ramon Casha
Oct 30th 2009, 06:51
Can someone show me the rule that says every country must have one, and only one, national day? We're not the only country who has more than one. So, we could have both Independence day AND Republic day if we choose to.
laurence schembri
Oct 29th 2009, 17:19
Of course Giovanni will say that, he lives in a trance, trapped within two decades.
MIchael Degiorgio
Oct 29th 2009, 15:59
MINTOFF DID NOT ONLY TAKE AWAY , 21ST OFSPETEMBER BUT ALSO QUIET A FEW OTHERS NOT TO MENTION LEAST OF ALL HIS HOME TOWNS FESTA SO PLEASE STATE ALL THE FACTS AND NOT JUST THE ONES THAT SUIT YOU
Anthony Schembri Adami
Oct 29th 2009, 14:25
A National Day is a day where all, rich and poor,employers and employees,where theNationalist and Labour Paries shoud feel united. It cannot be imposed.
Raymond Sammut
Oct 29th 2009, 14:00
@ Franco Farrugia
It is hard to disagree with the way you dismiss June 7. On the basis of the following statement:
"... agreement on a National Day cannot be simplified or corrupted by some sort of package-agreement between the party in government and the party in opposition", one can automatically dismiss Republic Day. This owing to the historical fact that Malta became a republic as a result of such "package-agreement". Your argument of "no Freedom Day without Independence Day" quickly eliminates both Freedom Day and Independence Day since without Victory Day neither of these could have become a reality. This leaves us with Victory Day. Unfortunately, however, readers of The Times (probably being predominantly PN loyalists) voted Victory Day as second preference. I am left wondering as to what preference readers of some other paper frequented by PL loyalists would express. Maybe Freedom Day? Anything but not Victory Day. Another symptom of Malta's diabolical political mindset.
Galea. L
Oct 29th 2009, 12:17
GiovDeMartino
Labour gave workers 52 extra days with their families when it made SATURDAY a non-working day as it was under the PN governments. This is besides the leave entitlement where the vast majority of the workers did not even have 8 days leave because if they asked for leave they risked losing their job. How about the minimum wage, same wages for women, maternity leave, voting at 18 years of age, a 40-hour week, children allowance and pensions which were voted against by the PN MPs as they said the pensioners will use it to get drunk on wine and many other workers benefits? These are just a sample DeMartino.
GiovDeMartino@ C Micallef
Oct 29th 2009, 11:53
Labour DID redfuce workers' holidays.
C Micallef
Oct 29th 2009, 11:16
I did not read all your opinion article as I had read it previously on
another paper. You speak so because it's not the first time you told us
that you're an educator. You have holidays galore! But we (the other
workers) can't risk taking any chances to reduce our holidays. So,
please be careful for us. Thanks