Mintoff was manipulated by PN - Sant
Sant undecided on whether to contest again
The conclusions of the Labour Party's election report, which blamed the defeat on the failings of the leadership trio, the general secretary and the party president, were shot down yesterday by former party leader Alfred Sant.
In his first fully-fledged political interview since resigning from MLP leader, Dr Sant said the report did not give due importance to three important factors: the government's power of incumbency, people who came to vote from abroad and his cancer problem.
Speaking to TVM's Reno Bugeja on Dissett, Dr Sant, now a backbencher, blamed the Nationalist government for using patronage in an "obscene" way before the election to win votes.
He even linked the death of gunner Matthew Psaila during a military training exercise earlier this year to the government's pre-election employment flurry, insisting the young man did not know how to swim and yet he still joined the army's special duties company just before the election. A spokesman for Gunner Psaila's family yesterday evening insisted the remark was "totally untrue and utterly insensitive" because the young man's mother was currently in hospital recovering from a major operation.
"Matthew joined the army after the election and he was qualified to join in the rank of officer cadet. However, it was his choice to join as a private and work his way up the ranks," the family spokesman said.
Dr Sant's remark prompted the national broadcaster to run a scroll on the pre-recorded interview pointing out that the inquiry into the soldier's death established there was no obligation for soldiers to know how to swim.
During the interview, Dr Sant talked little of the current Labour leadership, limiting himself to a warning born of experience.
"Labour under Joseph Muscat is doing well but I warn him to be careful and ensure that come the next election there will be a level playing field so that the government would not repeat the same obscenities it did last year," he said.
When talking of the Mistra scandal that characterised the last week of the election campaign, the former Labour leader said he had "no personal respect" for Nationalist MP Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando.
"I had no interest to confront him posing as a journalist. When we brought out the facts Pullicino Orlando should have convinced people with facts not theatrics," Dr Sant said of the incident when the PN backbencher had turned up with a hurriedly-issued press card for a Labour Party broadcast.
He also disagreed with the Attorney General's conclusion that there were not enough grounds for the police to prosecute Dr Pullicino Orlando, insisting this was another case where "the law is an ass".
Recalling the events that led to the Labour government's short-lived stint in power between 1996 and 1998, Dr Sant said Dom Mintoff was "manipulated" by the PN.
"On what happened in 1998 there are a number of facts that have not yet been made public and would justify what I am saying," he enigmatically said without being specific.When asked whether he had any remorse for the premature termination of his government, Dr Sant stuck to a previous "no regrets" comment, but possibly for the first time admitted he made a wrong decision before 1996. Possibly, he was referring to his decision to allow Mr Mintoff to stand as a candidate in the 1996 election.
During the interview Dr Sant reiterated his opinion that Malta's entry into the eurozone was premature and avoided answering a question on whether he would be contesting the next election.
"I have made no decision... It is still three years away and the future should not be pre-judged," he said.
10 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
c. camilleri
Oct 21st 2009, 16:04
The election defeat and his removal from the labour leadership did not have any effect on DR. Sant. He remained the same. He totally ignored the report about labour election's defeat and still insists on Govt's power of incumbency. He forgot that labour employed illegally more than 8'000 persons with the Govt besides the numerous favours and still lost the election.
Big Dom being manipulated by the Nationalists. This is rich indeed. As always DR. Sant blames everyone and everything except himself. He was always like that.
J Farrugia
Oct 21st 2009, 15:29
@ P Schembri - simple because nationalist government did more than mintoiff did in all his years in office, making trinek all over malta and still had nothing to show for it. Invece, The PN upgraded Malta from a totalitarian state to a demacoracy filled it up with IT and investments, upgraded our communications, financial and industrial sectors, built much needed infrastructure which was inexistant during Mintoff / KMB years, plus let everyone live in full tranquility and in a state of law. That's why. Why dont we look in the past, because your past is dirty and criminal. We want to look to the future - a future without hatred, a future without discrimination. Your past makes you see redder than red. That's why you dont want to talk about the past.
GiovDeMartino@P Schembri
Oct 21st 2009, 15:25
Do you mind telling me what connection is there bet. your comment and what is written above? And below!!!!!!!!
P. Schembri
Oct 21st 2009, 14:49
@Gio. Demartino. Still locked in the past!!!! And can't see beyond the tip of your nose with those dark blue blinkers you're wearing. How come the deficit rose from Euro 88 million just before the election of 2008 to over Euro 200 million a few months later!!!!
Dylan Olliver
Oct 21st 2009, 12:41
Mintoff manipulated by the PN ??? As if Mintoff was ever manipulated by anyone. Tell us more Dr Sant. We love having a laugh.
M. Gatt
Oct 21st 2009, 12:21
Il-Partit li bena Mintoff kissirtu int Sur Alfred Sant. Ghax ma tirtirax u thallina nghixu fil-kwiet. Tilef bizejjed elezzjonijiet il- Partit Laburista habba fik u dik il-klikka li kienet tappoggjak.
GiovDeMartino
Oct 21st 2009, 11:57
Power of incumbency!!!!!!!!!Like when eight thousand persons were employed by labour on the eve of an election. Mintoff manipulated by the PN. daqshekk gharef u kbir is-salvatur?
P. Schembri
Oct 21st 2009, 11:15
If Mintoff wasn't manipulated, then explain the facts, as told by Dr. Guido Demarco himself, why Guido and his comrades, visited Mintoff at his house in Delimara, several times during the days that Mintoff spent talking in Parliament? Explain the fact why the PN were ready to give Mintoff the free time necessary to continue lambasting Dr. Sant in Parliament? Explain the fact why the PN's Net TV gave time to Mintoff so that he can advertise his plans for the Cottonera Project? Explain the fact that they gave Mintoff allt he time he needed in Parliament, so that John Dalli can return in time from Libya, and be able to vote against the Government on a bill regarding tourism? Of course, there are other facts, but for now, I'll rest my case here!
Alex Spiteri
Oct 21st 2009, 10:58
Mintoff was indeed manipulated...but not by PN...but by his biggest Libyan friend!
John Gauci
Oct 21st 2009, 09:50
There he goes again ... the man with a PhD in losing elections. He is a liability to Labour and a boon to PN, and he is himself being manipulated as long as he does not shut up and decide to disappear from the political scene once and for all.