Malta, France seek clearer rules of engagement
"Apart from serving as a deterrent, the missions offer direct and first-hand information to the EU on what Malta is facing".
Malta and France have agreed future Frontex anti-migration missions should continue off the island's coasts but under clearer rules of engagement.
The future of the missions and the strengthening of the EU's border control agency were discussed at length during a meeting between Home Affairs Minister Carmelo Mifsud Bonnici and his French counterpart Eric Besson in Paris, yesterday.
A French Immigration Ministry dossier sent to Brussels last month questioned the effectiveness of the ongoing Nautilus IV mission in the Mediterranean.
It said the mission was not achieving any concrete results due to the different interpretation of the rules of engagement when migrants were found drifting at sea. According to France, the €10 million mission was "a complete failure".
Following the talks yesterday, Dr Mifsud Bonnici said that although Malta agreed there was room for improvement, the patrols were still important to Malta and France.
"For Malta it is better to have the Frontex missions than not to have them," Dr Mifsud Bonnici said.
"Apart from serving as a deterrent, the missions offer direct and first-hand information to the EU on what Malta is facing. This is very important and helps us persuade other member states to offer concrete solidarity to Malta."
Both countries agreed that clearer rules of engagement for the Frontex missions should be settled once and for all and there should be an agreement reached at EU level on who was ultimately responsible for illegal immigrants found in international waters.
"This issue has been dragging on for too long and Minister Besson agrees with us that the time has come to settle this matter. Member states and Frontex should decide the way forward," Dr Mifsud Bonnici said.
The start of this year's Frontex mission was postponed several times due to disagreements between Malta and Italy over who should be responsible for illegal immigrants found at sea.
The two countries finally agreed they should be taken by the country offering the closest safe port. However, following this deal, Italy decided not to send any assets to the Nautilus IV mission.
During the meeting with the Mr Besson, Dr Mifsud Bonnici also discussed Malta's bid to host the EU's Asylum Agency.
A decision should be taken by EU leaders at the end of the year.
3 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
louise vella
Oct 14th 2009, 17:03
"For Malta it is better to have the Frontex missions than not to have them," Dr Mifsud Bonnici said.
It depends.
If FRONTEX missions operate as a ferry service between Libya and Malta, as they have up to now, then it is better NOT to have them.
But it would be better to have them if they work as an effective coastguard, dissuading smugglers in human beings and their cargo from embarking on the trip – and if they do, pushing them back to where they came from. This is an invasion and has to be tackled as such.
John Azzopardi
Oct 14th 2009, 12:25
Frontex is the joke of the way we live in the EU today - the 21st century.
Mark Cushcieri
Oct 14th 2009, 10:30
Frontex missions to continue = basically meaning..immigrants will keep coming and the excuse that these so called 'refugees' who come well fed, with a satellite phone amazingly enough these 'poor' souls have trouble with the engine or scuttle the boat..the women come pregnant and ready so that their imposition will be forced upon us. what a shame from our goverment to relent to this invasion. It's all a conspiracy against us.