Editorial
Budget: Raising unnecessary expectations
As Labour politicians continue to raise great expectations ahead of the forthcoming budget for next year, the government appears dead set to be financially prudent, producing a budget that would hopefully help speed the transition to a situation where the economy would be able to pick up its growth rhythm again. The government has been strongly criticised by many, including this newspaper, over the past months about a number of issues seen by many to have been badly tackled but on this matter of the budget it should ignore the opposition's political game of trying to raise expectations for a good budget when it knows only too well that the country cannot afford at this stage to be liberal in dispensing finances raised from the taxpayers.
Labour, and some trade unions, too, are wrong, very wrong, in following this route, as raising expectations unnecessarily can do harm to the effort that is needed to consolidate the government's finances.
Labour politicians generally act as if Malta has escaped the impact of the slowdown when facts and figures show otherwise. Malta is, in fact, still in a recession and even though performance in a number of countries of direct interest to Malta, such as Germany, is improving, it will naturally take time for the island to start feeling the effects.
Even though economic sentiment in Malta declined in September, the Finance Minister has reported that there are now indications of an improvement in manufacturing as new orders were picking up. The government's major pre-occupation is, naturally, over its finances. It is also making the generation of new jobs one of its topmost priorities.
With revenues down, the government is expecting a deficit of 3.8 per cent this year according to its pre-budget document. If the final figure tallies with the forecast, the deficit will be lower than that for last year, 4.6 per cent, but the European Commission has given Malta up to next year to correct the deficit. However, considering all the demands placed on the Exchequer, particularly the surging expenditure involved in the running of welfare and health services, not to mention the investment the government plans to pump into projects meant to generate new jobs or stimulate growth, it is unlikely the government would be able to go back to below the threshold established by Brussels by the end of next year.
The minister's aim, as explained in a recent business breakfast, is to ensure stability in the government's finances. In what was possibly one of his best contributions in recent weeks, the minister, Tonio Fenech, argued the government could well do as other countries had done and raise the deficit. But if Malta were to do this, it would be even more difficult to get back to growth and reduce the deficit. He was quoted saying: "It is true that the rules say that the country must have a less than three per cent deficit. It will be difficult for the coming budget to promise that but, even so, the government must exceed that limit in a responsible way".
This ought to remain his guiding light, an argument strong enough to ward off, if well put, any political attempts from the Labour Party to deviate it from this route. As budget day draws nearer, such political attempts will increase as Labour, playing to the gallery, call for measures that can well derail the government from this course. It should strongly resist such moves.
3 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Joe Pavia
Oct 15th 2009, 00:16
@ N. Calleja
Life must be treating you very well in Cloud Cuckoo Land!
@ Editorial
How long ago was the last election? What was promised by the PN before the election? They promised Heaven on Earth and went on spending spree. It is because of those promises and the millions spent, that even if not by an absolute majority, they won. Therefore what is the Opposition doing wrong by asking the Government to deliver on their promises prior the election. The PN knew that there were dark days ahead, yet they still promised the impossible. Was not the election a game for Joe Saliba. Chess game he called it! So what makes it different to play another game now? But for the Times Labour never does anything right. Not only for the Times the black hearted Labour Party never did, does or will ever do anything right, but they never lose an occassion where they don't remind us what a hinderance, a harasser and a persecutor Labour has always been for the poor, kind and peace loving Nationionalist Party.
When are we going to learn to trully love, honour and respect this young Republic of ours?
N.Calleja
Oct 14th 2009, 16:14
As rightly said in this editorial,the government should not take notice of what the opposition is suggesting. From previous experiences we know that the opposition was always wrong on many issues. Take the EU membership, the euro, liberalisation and a hundred more issues. The governemnt has always been cautious in every budget and has always tailor -made its spending. This is where a government should be judged and not on flimsy issues. And this is the great difference between the government and opposition!
Henry S Pace
Oct 14th 2009, 15:06
As the Minister of Finance is in full swing preparing for the presentation of the Budget 2010, it seems that on personal basis he is in troul\bled waters regarding the free trip to spain to watch the Arsenal/Villareal match last April.
As an Arsenal supporter I do not blame him taking this opportunity to make this free trip and obtaining the free tickets to watch the match.
If ever this occasion arises allow me to inform the hosts of this venture that I would be very pleased if instead of inviting the Hon Minister I will greatly appreciate to have such an invitation and I assure one and all that I would have no conflict of interest.
In the mean time I would like to ask a pertinent question to all members of parliament be it a minister or a member in opposition of the House of Representatives if ever somebody knocked at their respective homes or Offices to present them with a hamper or some form of a token during Xmas or Easter periods or at some other special occasion which comes up during the year and have refused such tokens and returned the packs to the donors.