Proposed tuna ban defeated
Mixed reaction
Malta's multi-million tuna industry lives to fight another day after EU member states yesterday rejected a proposal to ban international trade in the species in order to protect it from further decline.
A vote was taken at the end of a meeting of EU fisheries representatives in which the majority of member states opposed a European Commission decision to provisionally co-sponsor an initiative taken by Monaco.
Monaco had proposed to list the fish under Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) at a meeting of the convention in March 2010, which would mean a total ban on trade in bluefin tuna.
Malta was among those who voted against the proposal yesterday. The island is known to have lobbied hard with other EU member states to defeat the Commission's position, which would have spelled disaster for the island's lucrative tuna industry.
The Commission had argued that the EU could offer its provisional support to Monaco's proposal while awaiting further scientific evidence on the population status of Atlantic bluefin tuna and the outcome of the annual meeting of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) in November.
A Commission official told The Times after the meeting that yesterday's decision by member states meant "Monaco's proposal is effectively dead" and the Commission would now stop any initiative taken towards a total ban.
The official response of the Commission was mixed, reflecting the contrasting position taken by its different directorates over the issue.
Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas, who was all in favour of a trade ban, said he regretted the member states' decision.
On the other hand, Fisheries Commissioner Joe Borg, who originally opposed the proposal made by the Commission, preferring a less drastic approach, said it was now up to ICCAT to assume its full responsibility to ensure the recovery of bluefin tuna.
"Now more than ever, every effort has to be made to give the ICCAT multiannual plan greater clout and to make it more effective, in line with scientific advice. ICCAT members have to realise that the very future of this iconic stock depends on it," he said.
It was a known secret in the Commission's corridors that Commissioners Dimas and Borg were not seeing eye-to-eye on this issue. Many pro-environment NGOs had in fact accused Dr Borg of being influenced by his country's interests in the trade and by his personal bid to obtain a second mandate for another five-year term at the Commission. Dr Borg denied these accusations.
Local tuna exports to the Japanese Sushi markets last year reached a value of €100 million. Maltese fishermen were also up in arms against the position taken by the Commission, arguing that tuna accounts for two-thirds of their annual income.
5 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
lgalea
Sep 22nd 2009, 21:42
Frans Scerri
Totally agree with you. Let's press for a referendum to leave the destructive eu and to hell with what politicians say.
Frans Scerri
Sep 22nd 2009, 14:08
Since when a NON-EU member (MONACO) decides the agenda of the EU?
Has the EU become a free-for-all roulette like the ones in Monaco?
Can we have a referendum on pulling out of the EU?
Julian Borg
Sep 22nd 2009, 13:01
Disgusting... I can't believe we're still living in a world where business wants the here and now, and don't care about what's gone tomorrow.
I want to ask what these fisherman plan to base their industry on once the Blue Fin is gone. Are they just planning to fish something else into extinction.
Find me a protest and I'll join it sign in hand.
C Micallef
Sep 22nd 2009, 11:40
This is what happens to greedy people who see big! What I pity is ourselves, Maltese citizens, because in spite to hearing so much about eatng oily fish regularly, there's no Tuna left for us, and on the very few occasions when when there was, it's price was sky high.
Daniel Borg
Sep 22nd 2009, 11:01
Typical shorts-sightedness of the commerical fishing sector. Greedy companies would rather milk the remaining tuna stock leading it to total stock collapse than letting the stocks recover naturally and fish in a sustainable way. What will to the fishermen once this happens and it's inevitable that it will happen?
Malta and other countries are only looking at the short term profits instead of the bigger picture. When the €100m will become 0 very soon, it will be too late to do anything about it.
Breeding also seems a very hard thing to achieve for this particular species. Only sustainable fishing can save it.