Environmentalists disappointed by Bluefin tuna vote
Nature Trust (Malta) and the World Wildlife Fund have expressed their concern over the rejection, by the EU, of a proposal to ban the international trading of Bluefin tuna.
Malta was among the countries which had lobbied against approval of the proposal.
Nature Trust said that short term economic gains were put before long term sustainable fishing and the welfare of this specie.
WWF said that despite the good progress represented by 21 out of 27 European Union Member States which had confirmed their support for the international trade ban, this majority was not enough for the ban to be ordered.
The vote was taken yesterday as a meeting of the EU's Management Committee for the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES.
"It is once again large-scale Mediterranean fishing interests trying to gang up against the long-term survival of Atlantic bluefin tuna and the industry this incredible species has sustained for thousands of years," said Aaron McLoughlin, Head of WWF's European Marine Programme. "Such a short-sighted and unambitious stance from the Mediterranean EU Member States against marine conservation is disappointing."
"WWF is calling on other CITES Contracting Parties to stand up for what the European Commission has accepted as necessary - that global trade in endangered Atlantic bluefin must be urgently halted until it is clearly on the road to recovery," continued McLoughlin. "After all, how can anyone enjoy contributing to extinction by buying, selling, cooking or eating a fish whose days are clearly numbered? Enough is enough."
4 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Ramon Casha
Sep 23rd 2009, 05:20
Perhaps if this ban had distinguished between tuna from fish farms and caught from the wild population, the proposal would have been more acceptable.
S. Camilleri
Sep 22nd 2009, 20:38
Yet another short sighted decision. I'm afraid the phrase "there's plenty more fish in the sea" will soon loose its meaning.
On another front,.. I can't help from smelling a tinge of hypocrisy here.. Though I am against hunting, how can one ban the hunting of quail so vehemently and on the other hand allow a key chain in the maritime ecosystem to be harvested like there is no tomorrow.
J Brownie
Sep 22nd 2009, 17:35
@D Vella
Whether the Japanese like it or not ( and all tuna fisherman for that matter ) they will soon be forced to wean off their greedy appetite for tuna as the species will simply cease to exists.
It is now well known that the present combination of tuna stock levels and the catching levels are unsustainable. So this is really as sad decision not only for the Japanese but for many other people , I included, that fancy a meal of tuna steak once in a season ( bil-malti nghidu kemm induquh pero ghad jigi zmien li t-ton ma induqux aktar - that will be sad day indeed)
DVella
Sep 22nd 2009, 14:33
Try and explain that last paragraph to the Japanese Mr. McLoughlin ! ! !