Lockerbie bomber may be out next week
Scottish government says release is speculation
The main headstone in the Lockerbie memorial garden in Lockerbie, south west Scotland. Families of victims of the 1988 Lockerbie bombing stood sharply divided yesterday over reports that the former Libyan agent jailed for life for the attack is to be freed on compassionate grounds.
The Libyan man convicted of the Lockerbie bombing could be freed on compassionate grounds next week, which means that his appeal, which will question the Maltese connection to the massacre, would be able to continue.
According to the BBC and Sky News, Abdelbaset Ali Mohmet al-Megrahi, who is the only person ever convicted for the 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103, could be released next week from the Scottish prison where he is serving 27 years.
There has been a lot of speculation over the past months over the fate of Mr al-Megrahi, who is terminally ill with cancer, after Libya filed an official request for his release under a prisoner exchange programme ratified by the UK in May.
That option, however, would have entailed him dropping his appeal proceedings in which his lawyers are expected to challenge the main evidence that secured his conviction in 2001.
Part of this evidence is the testimony of key witness Tony Gauci, a Maltese shopkeeper who had identified Mr al-Megrahi as having bought clothes from his shop that were later found wrapped around the bomb.
The news of his release was described as speculation in a statement by the Scottish government. However, the report on the BBC and other international newswires was not denied.
The statement said the Scottish government was weighing up whether to free the prostate cancer sufferer on compassionate grounds and whether to transfer him home to a jail in Libya, with a decision likely before the end of August.
But Frank Rubino, a US lawyer who has been involved in Mr Megrahi's defence, seemed to confirm the reports of his imminent release.
"I have been advised by members of the international defence team that for humanitarian reasons, (he) is being released from prison because he is suffering from a very serious, in fact fatal, disease," he said.
The BBC reported that the decision to release him was influenced by consensus on all sides that al-Megrahi should be back in Libya in time for Ramadan, the Islamic holy month next week.
Megrahi is serving life with a minimum term of 27 years over the explosion.
The blast killed all 259 on board, and 11 people on the ground, who died due to falling debris on the Scottish town of Lockerbie.
The reports of his release received a mixed reaction from commentators and victims' families, some saying it was "inhumane" to keep a seriously ill man in prison, while others were "sick of hearing about compassion and sympathy" for a "mass murderer."
Speaking to this newspaper, Robert Black, a former Scottish judge who was the architect of the original Lockerbie trial, welcomed the news.
"If it is indeed the case that Megrahi is to be granted compassionate release and returned to Libya before the beginning of Ramadan, I am delighted. I believe that he was wrongly convicted and should never have been in prison in the first place. But irrespective of his guilt or innocence, on simple humanitarian and compassionate grounds, he should be allowed to return to die in his homeland surrounded by his family and friends."
Professor Black was responsible for drawing up the framework for the trial, which was held in the Netherlands under Scottish law and which led to Mr al-Megrahi's conviction in 2001.
But he has consistently criticised the outcome, and also finds holes in the theory that the bomb left Malta.
He said, it would be a tragedy if some murky back-channel deal between the Scottish (or UK) Government has been entered into for the appeal to be abandoned in return for compassionate release being granted. "There are suggestions that this may be the case. I am, however, reluctant to believe that the Scottish (or UK) government could sink to such depths."
The ongoing appeal was ordered by the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission in 2007, after a four-year investigation that concluded Mr Al-Megrahi may have suffered a "miscarriage of justice".
The 57-year-old was diagnosed with prostate cancer last year.
His lawyer says it has spread to other parts of his body and is at an advanced stage, while his wife Aisha Megrahi told AFP earlier this year that he was "in danger of dying".
Five facts about Megrahi
• Al Megrahi was sentenced to 27 years in prison in 2001 for his part in blowing up New York-bound Pan Am flight 103 in December 1988, killing 259 people on board and 11 people on the ground in Lockerbie, Scotland. Mr Megrahi denies he played a part, saying he was an airline executive, not a Libyan intelligence agent as charged.
• He is held in a prison in the town of Greenock in western Scotland as he was tried and convicted under Scottish law, although the trial was held in the Netherlands.
• In November 2008 Mr Megrahi's lawyers asked a court to free him on bail, saying he was suffering from advanced prostate cancer.
• Libya lobbied for Mr Megrahi's release in 2009, saying in May it had applied to the Scottish government for him to be sent home as part of a prisoner transfer agreement. In July, Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi asked British Prime Minister Gordon Brown for help with the case.
• Mr Megrahi, 57, is married with five children. His wife and children have been able to visit him in prison in Scotland. He speaks Arabic and English, which he learned as a student in the United States.
11 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
malcolm seychell
Aug 15th 2009, 09:33
He should be left dying in prison. Shame on the authorities if they let him out.
The problem is that we do not have the death penalty. He should have been killed as soon as he was found guilty.
Galea. L
Aug 15th 2009, 09:13
M.Bezzina
Gaddafi only accepted because his country was suffering unjustly because the British and American governments wanted to blame someone to satisfy the relatives. I am certainly not saying that all investigations should not and must not be carried out, but evidence was hidden and it appears that the Maltese witness was not at all reliable as information which appeared on the BBC and other websites seems to indicate. I hope that someday the truth will surface notwithstanding everything that was done to hide it. It will at least clear the blemish on Malta and Air Malta. The world of international politics is a really dirty one.
Ramon Casha
Aug 15th 2009, 07:20
I think the recent doubts cast upon the evidence and the testimony of the Maltese shop owner are enough for this case to get revisited. Not that it will of course - there's no way that the US, UK or other involved countries would want to face the humiliation of a reversal of the verdict. Can you imagine if it was proved that they got it all wrong?
@M.Bezzina: The sanctions placed upon Libya might be one reason. It was the only way out for Libya and Gaddafi - admit responsibility and you can move on. It's not much different from extracting confessions under torture. The admissions are unreliable.
M.Bezzina
Aug 14th 2009, 16:18
@J.Debono
Shame on you and the people who continuely accus this guy and MALTA OF BEING INVOLVED
Its not me who accused him its the US and UK who did.
Galea. L
How about evidence which was not produced and hidden during the trial?
Col.Gaddafi accepted responability for it that why he payed compensation he also accepted the bombing of a Discothque in Germany!!
Why did he accepted when there was no evidence?
@Robert Scullion
.. and what good would having a man with terminal cancer rotting in jail until he finally dies do?
Let put it this way if he was the person involved yes I would have left him dying in the prison cell (pay attention: I would give all the treatment he required chemotherapy, surgergy, pain relief all a person needs) but wearing no mercy towards those 259+11 souls I would not hesitate doing the same) Only if he was the one who did it!!
Denis Catania
Aug 14th 2009, 15:40
THIS IS A SHAME. He should be left where he belongs, in prison.
Joe Morana
Aug 14th 2009, 15:36
This person was instrumental in cutting short the lives of 259 people in the sky, plus another 11 Locherbie residents on the ground. He also abused the privilages of his position that allowed him free access to so-called secure areas at the Malta airport. He succeeded in making a mockery of Maltese hospitality and goodwill. He should be left to rot in his Scottish prison cell!
J Debono
Aug 14th 2009, 14:53
@ Mr. Bezzina
This so called ex terrorist you called him was accused of something he definately did not do and was used as a scapgoat by the britsh and by the families of the dead.
Ask the families if they had the dignety to refuse the compensation that they got from the Libian Government who paid only because they where suffering under the International Imbargo Libya was subjected too.
This poor guy is paying somebody else's price and Malta was implicated also.
Shame on you and the people who continuely accus this guy and MALTA OF BEING INVOLVED
Galea. L
Aug 14th 2009, 14:41
M.Bezzina
Let's wait for the appeal Bezzina.
How about evidence which was not produced and hidden during the trial?
How about having to blame someone so as to get at a country which one does not like?
There were a lot of questionable actions in the case Bezzina, including trying to put a blame on Malta and Air Malta, so we have every interest to clear things up and not accept the previous judgment.
There were cases where people had been convicted of murder in England as in other places and after spending more than 20 years in prison have been declared innocent because the real murderer has either been found or DNA testing has cleared them and found the real culprit. Thank God that the death penalty has been repealed for no one can bring back a dead person, even though one would have wasted the years spent in prison of someone who was innocent.
Robert Scullion
Aug 14th 2009, 14:25
@M.Bezzina
.. and what good would having a man with terminal cancer rotting in jail until he finally dies do?
Neville Calleja
Aug 14th 2009, 13:39
@M Bezzina
Is he the bomber ...?
M.Bezzina
Aug 14th 2009, 12:12
So this ex: terrorist did not wear any kindness in killing the 259 on board the Pan AM flight.And because now he is terminally ill they released him!!
What ashame on the authorities!!