• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Concerns on heritage status of Valletta

Call for policies on high-rise buildings

Valletta's world heritage status may be threatened by the luxury apartment blocks at Tigné and by the city's newly built penthouses, The Times has learned.

Concerns about the capital's privileged status were raised in the last meeting of Unesco's World Heritage Committee in Seville, which asked the government to establish "clear policies" in relation to building height within the city and its environs.

The committee, which met six weeks ago, called for the establishment of a buffer zone around Valletta with building height controls to protect the "skyline configuration of the city".

It also asked the government to submit detailed information on the proposed large scale developments for Valletta's entrance in line with world heritage status guidelines.

The government has until February to address the concerns raised by Unesco.

The committee concluded that although previous documentation submitted by the government in 2007 identified the environs outside Valletta as an area of high landscape value, it did not clearly define the extent of the area.

"No buffer zone as such for the property (Valletta) is provided," the committee of experts said.

The committee made specific reference to a 16-storey development across the harbour at Tigné point.

It said photographic evidence submitted by government two years ago to refute the claim that the development would detract from Valletta's cultural value was deemed as "insufficiently clear" to reach a conclusion.

The submitted photographs had been taken from Bighi in Kalkara.

In view of these conclusions the committee asked the government to prepare an analysis of the "views and vistas" from strategic points within the city and outside it.

Another issue of concern was Mepa's decision to grant permits for penthouses in Valletta. Government had rebutted the accusation by submitting photographic evidence to show the penthouses were not having a negative impact on the cityscape.

However, the committee said the image was not clear enough and asked for the establishment of clear height control policies to protect the city's skyline.

The impact of high-rise development at Tigné on Valletta's cultural value was originally raised in 2007 by various environmental organisations opposed to the Fort Cambridge development, which consisted of two high-rise residential blocks containing 348 apartments.

The government brief for Fort Cambridge had stipulated a maximum of 16 storeys but this was sidetracked by Mepa when it approved 20 storeys.

Fort Cambridge will not be the only towering block on the overcrowded Tigné peninsula. Over the next few years the area will see two other high-rise towers go up as part of the Midi project, apart from other apartment blocks that have already been constructed.

The Unesco decision on Valletta comes at a time when the World Heritage Committee is being very critical of projects that could harm the "outstanding universal value" of cities on the World Heritage List. During the same committee meeting the city of Dresden lost its World Heritage status after being repeatedly warned about the construction of a bridge they wanted to build.

Valletta was accorded World Heritage Status in 1980.

ksansone@timesofmalta.com

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

v.pulis (on 12/8/09)
@ Simon Camilleri
The report says that the photographs from Bighi were supplied by th government so how can their purpose be to show the negative impact on Valletta?
Cecil Herbert Jones (on 12/8/09)
This is very good news for Valletta's sake. Unfortunately it also exposes how brain-poor the PN government is in terms of creative thinking and innovative thinking. Given this citation by UNESCO's World Heritage Committee, the PN should ask its MEPS to look for a loophole for I can't see them swallowing the frog! They're too proud to admit their blunder, a mistake which is poised to cost a minimum of €80 million!
Carmel Attard (on 12/8/09)
Isn't Valletta vandalised enough, with wires hanging everywhere, abondoned , shaggy buildings, and the Blasphemey of the Present Valletta Gate, and surrounds.. by we all know who .. another irrisponsible idiot!! These who are supposed to be our Leaders full of Wisdom and Vision are nothing but an utter low class act ! This goes also to the Labour Party, who in my mind are also accomplices in this matter, their silence is deafening.
We are always critisised for our opposition to irreparable harm and vandalism to our Great City. The Fact is that there have been may suggestions to rebuild what we had and keep everything in Perspective. Slight Modifications can always take place without totaly destroying Valletta's image and historical Heritage. Those who keep tlking up about moving with modern times .. have to rethink again, as what Modern Art would look like in the midst of St.John's Cathedral ... It would be worse than a "Daghwa f'Katidral"!!! The insult we had to face for the past 40 years .. should not be replaced by another one.
Simon Camilleri (on 11/8/09)
@ V Pulis. The photos were taken from Bighi to show that the development would ruin Valletta's skyline from as far away as Kalkara. This point was raised at the Fort Cambridge hearing at MEPA but was pooh-poohed, as was a letter from the Superintendent of Cultural Heritage.
Marvin Mizzi (on 11/8/09)
This is what the irresponsibility of this current adminstration is bringing our capital city with decision just being taken without seeing the impact on our Capital. And in all this time were is the Valletta Local if there exist one!!!!!!
Simon Camilleri (on 11/8/09)
@ Enzo Caruana - dont hold your breath!
r sammut (on 11/8/09)
The threat on Valletta’s retention of heritage status is already precarious from external development. Then the Piano’s plans are just the way forward to apply the deciding blow!
Enzo Caruana (on 11/8/09)
"The government brief for Fort Cambridge had stipulated a maximum of 16 storeys but this was sidetracked by Mepa when it approved 20 storeys".

Now this really merits a thorough investigation Mr Prime Minister
Nigel Lawrence (on 11/8/09)
Piano's ill fitting disaster will be final nail in Valletta's coffin.
Charles Sammut (on 11/8/09)
We philistines could be proved right after all. Piano's plans are a "daghwa f'katidral".
Anna farrugia (on 11/8/09)
Veru tal- Mickey Mouse Malta!
lgalea (on 11/8/09)
Its disgusting to have our capital city and such massive buildings consisting of concrete matchboxes in Tigne when there are so many thousands of apartments that are unsold.
Daniel Russell (on 11/8/09)
Sheer civic vandalism in the pursuit of money...... Now we also have Piano's half baked scheme for the opera house. The Maltese people and tourists are proud of Valletta but why not the policy makers. Wake up before its too late. Valletta should be a conservation area in the forward planning documents and it should be protected. Take Ironbridge, a sister world heritage site in Shropshire, development is heavily restricted and also has to be exactly in keeping with what was there before.
v.pulis (on 11/8/09)
The submitted photographs had been taken from Bighi in Kalkara.!!!!!
This is absolutely ridiculous. How can one assess the impact the Tigne monstrosity will have on Valletta with pictures from this angle? The pictures should have been taken from the Marsamxett side of valletta, Manoel Island and from the middle of Marsamxett harbour. clearly the angle chosen was meant to give a false picture of the real impact the high rise concrete jungle will have on the capital city.
g.portelli (on 11/8/09)
Really is that so? Who would have thought that now! . It is incredulous how our heritage experts are screamingly silent on these atrocities. What were they hoping for exactly that Unesco does a Mepa and overlooks the infringement and chaos? Looking at Tigne from St. Nicholas str certainly does away with the idea of Valletta as a heritage site. The views from Valletta were just as part of world heritage as the Valletta bastions. The politicians and Mepa experts obviously have no shame. How will they sell it I wonder, that the destruction of Valletta was an ethical necessity? Quo Vadis the Heritage Advisory Committee?
Patrick William (on 11/8/09)
I cannot but think that Mr. Piano's proposed 21st century design for a new Parliament building in Freedom Square will hardly enhance Valletta's continuing status as a World Heritage city!
Adrian Borg Cardona (on 11/8/09)
I am totally shocked. What a stage to get to! Not even Valletta is respected by this Govt. This is really the limit of a Govt whose main concern has been to keep the contractors happy. This is the same Govt that has allowed the entrance to Valletta to become an African bazaar, the lights at the Gate covered in pigeon muck and walls plastered with posters. The same is happening in the little square opposite the law courts. This Govt shows absolutely no concern for Maltese natural, historical or achitectural heritage. And they call themselves "nationalists"!!
O. Sant Angelo (on 11/8/09)
"It also asked the government to submit detailed information on the proposed large scale developments for Valletta's entrance in line with world heritage status guidelines."

This issue was raised in a letter to The Times by a correspondent a couple of months ago and plenty of comments online rebutted it disdainfully, arguing that Piano is a UNESCO Goodwill Ambassador so how could UNESCO not accept anything he comes up with.

Right.

Now here we are with the same issue brought up by UNESCO itself. Any of those people care to explain what this is all about then or will they spin it as a formality of some sort?
Stefan Engelbert (on 11/8/09)
Dresden lost its status just because they planned a bridge across the river. That should be kept in mind with any plans for Valletta!
Pierre Mangion (on 11/8/09)
Just reading through this report, i felt disgust at the way that our country is being destroyed, and now even international agencies are seeing this. i would like to ask where was MEPA and government in the adherence to the UNESCO world heritage status guidelines, when granting these permits? another question that i would like to ask those responsible is whether the "Piano" project falls within the UNESCO Guidelines? what will happen if Valletta looses this prestigious status - or shall it be deemed as lost!!!?

Poll

Do you agree with the compensation that is being given to the bus owners?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku