Mepa auditor to probe Qala permit
The popular restaurant in the limits of Qala which commands a breathtaking view of Mġarr Harbour and Comino. Photo: Max Xuereb
The planning authority auditor, Joe Falzon, will be looking into a permit to convert a restaurant overlooking Mġarr harbour into an apartment block.
The call for an investigation was made by nine environmental groups and the Qala local council, which claimed that the Development Control Commission had taken an "irrational" decision which was "certainly not taken in the best interests of Gozo" in granting this permit.
When contacted after their statement was issued, Mr Falzon said he would be looking into the case.
The permit, originally refused by the Malta Environment and Planning Authority's planning board, revolves around the well-known Gozitan restaurant Ta' Xerri l-Bukkett, a prime site in Qala.
"In spite of the well-informed recommendations of the case officers to dismiss reconsideration of the application, the Development Control Commission board irrationally overruled and decided to break structure plan and local plan policies with the usual nonchalance," the organisations claimed.
The organisations are the Ramblers' Association of Malta, Nature Trust, Flimkien għal Ambjent Aħjar, Friends of the Earth, BirdLife Malta, Din l-Art Ħelwa, Gaia, Malta Organic Agriculture Movement and Light Pollution Awareness Group, which have the backing of the Qala local council.
The NGOs accused Mepa of persisting in disrespecting its own internal regulations and continuing to freely interpret local plan policies, "breaking them flagrantly at will".
According to the NGOs, the application infringes a number of policies, including the fact that large commercial areas in a purely residential zone was unacceptable and devaluated a highly scenic area.
The permit is for the construction of additional residential units, demolition of dwellings, construction of dwellings with pools and of a basement parking area, apart from sanctioning discrepancies at the existing commercial area.
They claimed both the Mepa directorate and the planning board treated "an unclear situation regarding a claim of illegality of part of the structure" very lightly, adding this alone should render the permit null.
"It is unexplainable that building infringements were ignored and permits issued when an almost adjacent habitation was denied water and electricity services for years and had its windows walled up because of building infringements," the NGOs said.
They said in such a location of pristine landscape value, which was visible to all visitors arriving by ferry, any development proposal should be totally screened and should not be obtrusive.
"The insensitive development will have serious repercussions on the remainder of the belvedere road, will lead to more development between Mġarr and Qala, negatively impact the visual impression of visitors, and irreversibly destroy the landscape value of the cliff face of the southern coast of Gozo," they said.
When contacted, a Mepa spokesman said the authority could not comment on the planning permit since the auditor was being asked to investigate.
But in a statement issued last week the authority said all policies related to the site had been respected.
It said the development could not be higher than two storeys from street level, and the application had been approved following a number of reconsiderations.
9 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Victor Laiviera
Aug 6th 2009, 09:51
Mr Michael Seychell, very predictably, refers to a time when "there was a one man show the Minister responsible for the PAPB " and asks if we want to go back to such a time.
Someone should tell him that we never left it. The only difference is that, at that time, the people who took the decisions took them up-front and bore the responsability.
Now they still take all the decisions, but they have the luxury of MEPA to hide behind.
Edward Camilleri
Aug 5th 2009, 19:47
Well done goes to the NGOs who have brought this matter forward. If it weren't for them such applications will continue because MEPA does not have the interest of the public, but a few greedy developers.
Michael Seychell
Aug 5th 2009, 18:54
I admit that MEPA, despite the original good intentions when it was set up, it turned to be a monster specialising in eating the small and feeding the speculators. But it will be a mistake to get rid of MEPA, in fact no NGO has suggested or condoned such ideas. We must remember that before MEPA there was a one man show the Minister responsible for the PAPB whose chairman for some time was a renowned speculator . I do not think that anybody, more so the environmenmtal NGOs would ever want to go back to that time immaterial who is in government, whether PN or M/LP. Since the Government has recently invited the citizens to submit their suggestions on the MEPA reform, one hopes that all competent persons & NGOs will submit their suggestions for government's consideration. I sincerly hope that even the opposiotion will give its important contribution as happened years ago on the Financial Services legislation, and on the Rent reform recently. Let us hope that this leads to an Authority that will save the environment without killing the building industry. Michael Seychell Tal-Pieta
c dimech
Aug 5th 2009, 18:31
I BET THAT HE WILL FIND ANOTHER MISSING FILE
v.pulis
Aug 5th 2009, 14:27
But in a statement issued last week the authority said all policies related to the site had been respected.
A sweeping statement which shows that the 'policies' need to be amended.
P.Cassar
Aug 5th 2009, 13:44
PLEASE SOMEONE, SOMEWHERE GET US RID OF MEPA. Very soon there will be nothing to save. And Mepa was supposed to be the GURADIAN OF THE ENVIRONMENT. Say this to any Maltese and s/he will burst out laughing or (more suitably) crying
Galea. L
Aug 5th 2009, 11:53
Paul Barrett
Can you blame people for suspecting high level corruption in MEPA?
J Portelli
Aug 5th 2009, 11:40
Thank you Joe Falzon and all our enviornmental NGOs. You are truely the only people safeguarding our enviornment.
Prosit GonziPN and MEPA you are doing what you know best. ENVIORNMENTAL DESTRUCTION!!
Paul Barrett
Aug 5th 2009, 11:24
What I do not understand is how, in the islands of Malta and Gozo where there are some really beautiful buildings, the Planning Authority sanctions buildings which are so unsightly and truly out of place in type, style, shape material and general construction with the remainder.