Contentious swine flu jab on shelves in October
Jabs to protect against swine influenza which have not undergone mass testing are expected to be available in Malta, even though the government has decided against using them for vaccination.
The vaccine in question, which should be on the shelves around October, is being manufactured without the usual rigorous human testing that uncovers any side effects and ensures users' safety.
The local authorities have decided not to compromise vaccine safety, preferring to wait for a fully-tested jab expected to be available towards the beginning next year. They are keeping their options open and might still buy a stock of the earlier vaccine, especially for workers more exposed to the risk, in case it proves safe.
However, they could not stop the earlier vaccine from entering the country once it was given the green light by the European Medicines Authority, director general of health Ray Busuttil said.
The UK, Greece, France and Sweden are planning to go for early vaccination while the US is taking a more cautious approach following a medical catastrophe in 1976 when hundreds of people vaccinated for another form of swine flu developed a paralysing disorder - Guillain-Barre syndrome - and more than 30 died.
The World Health Organisation has also voiced concern about skipping mass testing. In an interview with the Associated Press, WHO flu chief Keiji Fukuda warned about the potential dangers of untested jabs, stressing there must be no doubt about the safety of swine flu vaccines before giving them to the public.
His comments last month came days after the local authorities decided not to go for the October vaccines, which were originally intended for the H5N1 avian influenza virus, but were modified for the current H1N1 virus causing a global pandemic.
Last week The Times reported that the issue was discussed at Cabinet level and the authorities decided not to compromise vaccine safety. During a press conference yesterday, Parliamentary Secretary for Community Care Mario Galea said the decision was made following long discussions within the Health Pandemic Committee.
"The experts' advice was the vaccine should be tested and certified as safe before we administer it to the population," he said, adding Cabinet endorsed this advice.
While the manufacturing companies are saying this was an educated risk, governments which opted to go for the vaccines in question were being asked to assume responsibility for any side effects.
"There is a huge disclaimer," Dr Busuttil said.
Although he could not tell the public not to take the jab, which will be sold against a prescription, Dr Busuttil said those taking it should be aware that the vaccine would not have a safety profile.
"It is up to people to decide whether to take it or not, but on a national level, we decided it was not worth the risk," he said.
He said the jab should not be given to children, adding that even the fully-tested one would not be cleared for youngsters immediately.
The government's decision was also taken in the light of the mildness of swine influenza, which has affected thousands worldwide. Malta has had 168 confirmed cases, 115 of whom have totally recovered without complications, while two are being treated in hospital. Since only vulnerable cases were being swabbed, Dr Busuttil said there have probably been more cases.
The authorities reiterated their annual call for people to take the seasonal vaccine, saying although this would also be available around October, it would have undergone the usual rigorous testing.
2 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
kevin ellul-bonici
Aug 2nd 2009, 14:31
Let us not forget that the main culprit for the hype is WHO. First they changed the criteria defining what a pandemic level 6 is, going to "level 6" by early spring - that is the highest level. Did WHO know something we did not? Here's Maggie Chan alarming the world: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jul/16/swine-flu-pandemic-who-warning
In the US, 35,000 die annualy of regular flu, yet they were alarming the public by the time the first "swine flu" victim died. They also warned that this could mutate. Again, do they know something we don't? Various scientists have been reported as saying, notably by Bloomberg, that this is a lab engineered virus, a hybrid of human, swine and bird flu viruses. Could Baxter's "error" in sending out 71 kilos of regular vaccine with the bird flu virus have anything to do with it? Why were the Polish doctors and nurses using test vaccines prosecuted after people died, while Baxter and/or Novartis were not? Why are the US military forces to be involved in what is being described as forced mass vaccinations in the US? Why are the newly built FEMA camps being designated as quarantine areas? Anything to do with what's reported here? http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/28/us/politics/28continuity.html
M Borg
Aug 2nd 2009, 11:04
All this publicity about swine flu should be instead informing people about the regular flu as it kills 250000 - 500000 around the world, each year. I personality do understand why the media is only talking swine flu? Is it a way to scaremonger people as a way of government control? Or is it to scare people to purchase drugs to make the pharmaceutical companies many more millions? Or is it just a good story to sell newspapers?