Election campaign expenses to be released next week
The campaign expenses of the five elected Maltese MEPs will be made public next week, the Electoral Commission said.
All five submitted their expenses breakdown to the Electoral Commission by last Friday and took an oath, as stipulated by the electoral law.
However, they have so far denied public access to their declarations, which, the Electoral Commission said, would published in the Government Gazette next week.
"As required by law, we should be publishing the list of all candidates who have submitted their expenses declarations to the Electoral Commission. From then onwards, members of the public can, if they so wish, come to our offices in Valletta and view the declarations," a commission spokesman said.
The electoral law lays down that a candidate in any election cannot spend more than €1,400 per district on promotion. Given that the MEP elections are fought across all districts in Malta and Gozo, the limit rises to over €18,000.
The Sunday Times has been pursuing this issue for the past eight weeks after an analysis revealed that at least eight MEP candidates may have exceeded the limit.
Two of the unelected candidates have already admitted they exceeded the threshold and are risking minimal consequences such as a fine. The stakes are much higher for elected candidates who could theoretically lose their seats if they are found to have broken the law.
Nationalist candidates Frank Portelli and Edward Demicoli declared they were unable to take an oath according to the form provided by the Electoral Commission. To do so, they insisted, would be to take a false oath.
Despite having said they remained within the €18,000 legal threshold requirement, all five elected MEPs have so far failed to meet a request by The Times to publish the declarations submitted sent to the commission.
The three Labour MEPs - Louis Grech, John Attard Montalto and Edward Scicluna - ignored an e-mail sent by The Times asking them to release the declarations. Nationalist MEPs Simon Busuttil and David Casa only referred The Times to the Electoral Commission.
During the inaugural session of the European Parliament in Strasbourg last week, both Nationalist and Labour MEPs criticised the rules as being too "ambiguous" and "out of date".
While insisting they respected the threshold during the last campaign, they called for an immediate change to the rules in order "to reflect better today's needs and reality."
The issue has been hitting the headlines after Mr Demicoli and later Dr Portelli admitted they had overshot the legal requirement in their respective campaigns.
Last Sunday, Mr Demicoli criticised the declarations made earlier by the elected MEPs saying they "had descended into Orwellian doublespeak".
"I am disappointed that my MEPs have decided to take this course of action. As for me, we had a moral obligation to tell the truth," he told The Sunday Times.
In a joint letter to Parliament Speaker Louis Galea, who chairs a parliamentary select committee on constitutional changes, Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi and Opposition Leader Joseph Muscat attempted to quell the controversy by urging the committee to discuss the matter and come out with proposals for a revision of the rules on electoral expenditure.
4 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Charles Sammut
Jul 24th 2009, 16:17
@ J Martinelli The lights of Brussels burn bright for some who would stop at nothing to get there. They are not about to let a bit of legislation get between them and the EU gravy train. The temptation is too much to resist. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjXMcpVdLDI
stephen farrugia
Jul 24th 2009, 15:20
I am 100% sure that any fantastic cover up, will not work and I am 100% sure that we will have another election. Don't say i did not inform you of events to come.
J Martinelli
Jul 24th 2009, 12:21
It is beyond me how MEP candidates of any party, knowing how the public has become obsessed with the minutest of irregularities, would have gone ahead and exceeded their campaign spending limits!
The five MEPs would have been much smarter to raise the issue of ambiguities and out of date rules before, rather than after the election.
s. farrugia
Jul 24th 2009, 10:31
This should be a good laugh !