'Deficit will come in line in 2013'
Malta's deficit will only fall below the three per cent mark in 2013, three years after an EU deadline, according to the International Monetary Fund.
It is predicting that by 2013 public debt would reach 70 per cent of GDP. It also forecast that despite Malta no longer having one-off expenses such as the liquidation of the shipyards, it was still only likely to improve marginally on the 2008 deficit, when it stood at €233 million.
The IMF, which published a report at the end of its annual mission in Malta, said the economy was expected to contract by two per cent this year, followed by a modest recovery in 2010. Moreover, the recovery would not be straightforward and conditional on an improvement in economic growth of Malta's trade partners.
It was critical of the way the government supported companies facing difficulties as a result of the financial crisis. "Measures taken to support enterprises raise some concerns. Assistance is provided based on specific criteria related to investment and training plans. While this setting has allowed for rapid and targeted support, such measures could become entrenched and costly if the crisis continues. In addition, in some cases, they may only postpone required restructuring. Therefore, the mission recommends gradually winding down this type of support as the implementation of infrastructure projects gather pace".
It said the government should not tolerate late tax payments from companies with cash flow difficulties. "Even if not widespread, these steps risk undermining tax compliance and contract enforcement. For these taxes in arrears, expeditious negotiation of a repayment schedule will be critical," it said.
The IMF said determined action on expenditure was needed because the spending structure hindered adjustment to shocks and suggested that forthcoming negotiations on the public sector collective agreement should set a conservative benchmark for the private sector.
The government had to tackle the causes of inflation quickly, which at the time the mission was here had reached the four per cent of GDP mark, substantially higher than in the rest of the euro area.
On the new electricity tariff structure, the IMF said the government had to ensure full cost recovery for the state-owned utility enterprises while providing consumers with transparency and predictability in tariff adjustments. The country should go ahead with seeking strategic investors for Bank of Valletta, the IMF said.
It said Malta's financial sector had so far withstood the global financial turmoil relatively well but "vulnerabilities have increased". Profitability would remain under pressure from lower volumes, a narrowing in interest margins and rising non-performing loans as the economy slowed down.
It envisaged that private consumption would weaken as employment prospects deteriorated. Banks had weathered the initial stage of the financial crisis and emerged "relatively unscathed" but the unfavourable external environment was now challenging the economy's resilience, threatening to possibly hold back the country's reform impetus.
The IMF said the Maltese authorities had to act fast "to remove the bottlenecks that have so far held back EU fund absorption", possibly through a high-level inter-ministerial committee.
6 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Joseph E Briffa
Jul 17th 2009, 08:37
To all the armchair critics....why don't you enlighten us on how to better our quality of life which is the highest we ever had? You could also volunteer your services to the UK which is in quite a mess. Pity you keep your remedies to yourselves; why don't you share them with us? We would be more than grateful and you would earn the gratitude of the people in the EU and the US who are finding it difficult to stem the tide.
Galea. L
Jul 16th 2009, 22:02
P.Cassar
J Martinelli will continue to defend the idefensible, namely Gonzi and his incompetence even if the whole world was saying the opposite. You have to take everything he says with more than a pinch of salt.
P.Cassar
Jul 16th 2009, 17:42
@J Martinelli
What are you talking about me having answers for the country's problems when I pay taxes to pay Ministers and a PM to manage our money. I though you were going to side with me in denouncing the bad management in the last twenty years which has seen our country amass a debt which is frightening even the EU.
But then someone told me that you do not even live here to partake of the good life you are dreaming that we have here. HOW COME??? What is exactly your agenda?
J Martinelli
Jul 16th 2009, 15:14
@ Gianluca Barbieri
Did you anticipate the collapse of the financial banking system in the USA? Did you anticipate the world recession and its depth? Did you anticipate the auto industry collapse and the billions spent by several governments in order to prop them up? Did you anticipate the millions thrown out of work and the pressure on governments to pay them unemployment benefits? Do you ever watch world news?
Are you ready to modify your expectations in view of all the above? Is bellyaching your only contribution?
@ P Cassar
And I suppose you would have had solutions at your fingertips! You have had it so good for so long that you got too cozy and at the least sign of a temporary setback, you fall to pieces and blame the government for it.
Have you forgotten the days when Malta's motto was 'rossu c-cinturin'? You have water in your taps, better roads, limitless communication system, freedom of expression, stability and no fear of being beaten up by thugs because you wrote some criticism against your government using your real name.
What price would you not pay for all that?
P.Cassar
Jul 16th 2009, 13:35
I shudder to imagine what this means to us remembering that we have
a 'bankrupt' govt.with several BILLIONS IN THE RED,
the Eu hounding down his neck,
the budget round the corner,
a recession very badly managed
and us poor helpless folk waiting for the axe to fall come October
This is exactly how twenty years of PN maladministration has rendered the Maltese nation
Gianluca Barbieri
Jul 16th 2009, 13:05
Just in time for the elections 2013!
First Surplus 2010, then Surplus 2011 now no Surplus at all in this legislature.. if they knew that a international crisis was coming our way, why did they promise us such a thing last general election? What they promise they must execute without any excuses.. or else don't promise anything at all in the first place! ;) Buying votes in this manner is a morale fraud.