
Friday, 10th July 2009
Mepa reform
PM seeks 'magical balance'
Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi yesterday launched his plans for Mepa reform, which includes a more direct role for the government in policy making and full-time members on the development control boards.
The reform also envisages the creation of a planning ombudsman to replace the function of the Mepa auditor.
Dr Gonzi said the reform tried to find the "magical balance" between the interests of developers, environmentalists, residents and the community at large.
The reform would see Mepa downsizing its functions to focus on its core business of implementing planning and environmental policy and processing development applications.
Policy making would fall directly within the remit of a new policy unit that would be set up in the Office of the Prime Minister.
Fulfilling an electoral pledge that had weighed heavily on the outcome of last year's election, the blueprint for Mepa's reform was published in a 38-page booklet.
The number of Development Control Commissions, where most permits are decided, will be brought down to two and their members would be full-timers in Mepa's employ.
The appeals board would also be staffed by full-timers and, in sensitive cases, it could even stop a development pending a third party appeal.
The Development Planning Act and the Environment Planning Act would be fused into one single law.
A new voluntary pre-application screening process was being proposed.
The Labour Party (PL) said the reform was "not courageous enough" in addressing the people's concerns. Labour spokesman Roderick Galdes said the reform did not put much emphasis on transparency and accountability. He said the issue of conflict of interest of DCC board members was not addressed.
He welcomed the strengthening of the enforcement unit and the appointment of a member from civil society on the Mepa board even though it still had to be established how this member would be chosen by the government.







RSS
Comments
The solution has to be simple. The permit is given by the architect, who must follow guide lines to the letter and the law enforcement with MEPA, with the power to suspend that same architect.
or drop all building after 1800 and start all over again...... :)
Here I am refering to the diminishing of ODZ areas and worse than that building permits in ODZ areas; pre-election agreements with Armier squatters, very strange?? decisions, etc, etc.
I wonder how much of the money that was moved out of Malta in order to avoid tax and thereby deprive the nation of funds to improve Malta's environment came back to ruin it ?
How ironic that the real and environmental cost of the overseas money amnesty will be paid by future generations of honest, hard-working tax payers, most of whom won't be able to afford the concrete boxes they unwittingly helped to build
Lets hope to see serious changes and action not the usual sweet talk ... tqazzizna naraw Malta tinbidel f'Metropoli tal-Konkrit!!!!!