• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Emissions alerts

ADT admits it ignored SMS reports

The Malta Transport Authority (ADT) yesterday admitted it had not tested any cars reported by SMS throughout 2008 saying it was working on a new automated system to filter such information.

While it apologised for temporarily suspending tests on reported vehicles, the ADT said that emissions tests were still being carried out by VRT stations, by road-side inspections and by random checks on private passenger-carrying and goods-carrying vehicles, including public transport buses, coaches, trucks and other heavy vehicles.

The transport watchdog was reacting to a damning report, tabled in Parliament by the Auditor General, which revealed that the ADT had ignored text messages sent in by citizens reporting vehicles that were belching thick, black smoke into the air.

Vehicle emissions are a major source of air pollution, which impacts negatively on public health and the environment. Their effects are further aggravated by Malta's high vehicle density and the fact that the average age of cars is much higher than the EU average.

According to the report, the public reported 30 per cent of the public transport vehicles, 10 per cent of commercial vehicles and four per cent of private vehicles.

In its reply, the ADT said it had conducted just over 1,300 random road-side tests on coaches and buses since 2005. Of these, 743 failed the test. Between October 1, 2006 and June 30, 2007, it had summoned a total of 1,200 vehicles for testing on the basis of text messages it had received. Of these, 721 vehicles were tested and a licence restriction was issued to the remaining 479 that failed to turn up for their appointment.

Licence restrictions do not allow owners to renew their vehicle licence before it passed the emissions test.

With regard to the temporary suspension of the SMS-generated emissions tests, the ADT said its initiative to revamp and automate the manual and time-consuming SMS filtering process had been "opportunely not mentioned by the (Auditor's) report".

Once the new system was in place, it would call up for emission testing those vehicles reported by three or more SMS messages over the past months.

Since the report was tabled in Parliament, several people posted comments on timesofmalta.com with many calling it "a waste of people's time and money". Despite knowing it had not summoned any reported vehicles for testing since last year, the ADT still urged the public to continue sending reports on 5061 1899.

mxuereb@timesofmalta.com

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

caroline ebejer (on 10/7/09)
This is a big shame on ADT. If they had no intention of following through with the sms alert, why ask the citizens to report the emmission?

Does the ADT think that it can make fun of the Maltese?

Big disgrace on ADT.
r pace bonello (on 10/7/09)
Who is the ADT trying to fool? Nothing but excuses and in the meantime we continue to be poisoned by the antiquated Public Transport buses. I have personally reported dozens of buses, as I had been encouraged to do by the ADT. They even went so far as to thank me for doing my civic duty!!! By their own admission 57% of coaches and buses tested failed the test. What happened following this failure? Were they retested? Since these tests took place since 2005 it is fair to assume that, with the passage of time, the situation has got much worse. What happens when a bus fails the test? We have a right to know and if they are unable to rectify the situation they should state why.
victor caruana (on 10/7/09)
Who is responsible in this foresaken island??
C Cassar (on 10/7/09)
ADT says it suspended tests on vehicles while it works on an automated system to filter sms alerts. It also attacks the NAO for not mentioning this in its report.

The NAO report (available online) tells a very different story. At page 39 it quotes the ADT as saying that it did NOT intend to introduce such a system because "the costs involved were deemed to outweigh any arising benefits".

This discrepancy is frankly disturbing. The ADT has some serious explaining to do.
Mariella Gatt (on 10/7/09)
What incompetence on the ADT's part! It should have had the decency to inform the public that it was not acting on SMS reports and that it is developing a new system. Can the ADT provide some information regarding the scheduled date for going live with this new system?
Moira Heath (on 10/7/09)
To ADT I say, you will never receive another sms from me until you rectify the situation. Ever since your SMS service was started, I noticed MORE buses and other vehicles emitting fumes, not less. The system is not working, and you know where the fault lies. I will only start using your service once I notice a difference in the quality of the air I breathe. In the meantime, please get your act together, cause your incompetence knows no bounds.
E Gatt (on 10/7/09)
Well at least ADT apologised however the figures are extremely disappointing in my opinion.

The SMS Emission Alert was only supposed to supplement ADT’s efforts and not to replace their inspectors! So an average of one inspection a day is ineffective and unacceptable.

I suggest ADT employ/subcontract X teams of 2 people each. One stays at the bottom of a hill, takes note of the registration numbers of vehicles (including buses) and if necessary alerts his team-mate at the top of the hill to stop the vehicle concerned. Set targets for these teams (more than 1 a day!) and pay them accordingly. The fines collected will more than pay for the expense of employing/subcontracting these teams.

The public transport reform is a great opportunity to remove the old polluting buses from our streets. The government should be fully supported to overcome any resistance to the radical reforms needed.
Grazio Vella (on 10/7/09)
The least they could do is ask the public from refraining to send the sms until the new system is in place.

Then see the last paragraph. They are asking us to continue sending the sms! Who's going to fall for it now?

Poll

Was the budget good for Malta?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku