
Wednesday, 8th July 2009
Emissions
Reported vehicles untested
Vehicle emissions are a major source of air pollution
Photo: Darrin Zammit Lupi.
No vehicles were summoned by the Malta Transport Authority (ADT) for emission testing since last year, a report has found.
Through text messages, the public reported 30 per cent of the public transport vehicles as opposed to 10 and four per cent of commercial and private vehicles respectively.
However, the potential of the Emissions Alert Campaign (EAC) was not fully realised, mainly because a large number of reported vehicles were not summoned for testing.
Although the ADT applied a higher filtering threshold than that prescribed, its testing capacity was still unable to cope, according to the Auditor General's report tabled in Parliament.
The vehicle emissions' control schemes have brought about "some improvement" in compliance but, despite this, the framework had to be strengthened further.
The fine-tuning of these schemes, through enhanced planning, implementation and enforcement, should contribute towards a more robust and sustainable vehicle emissions' control framework, the report noted.
It proposes that the framework be reviewed to ascertain that the relative schemes are not piecemeal or incremental but designed as part of a holistic and comprehensive strategy, aimed at tackling excessive vehicle emissions.
The report also recommends that, in conjunction with the recently-introduced fiscal measures related to vehicle licensing, annual Vehicle Roadworthiness Tests for older cars would also be considered and penalties introduced in cases where fuel pump seals are found to be broken.
Vehicle emissions are a major source of air pollution, which impacts negatively on public health and the environment. Their effects are further aggravated by Malta's high vehicle density and the fact that the average age of cars is much higher than the EU average.
The audit focused on the four schemes of the vehicle emissions' control framework, namely the VRT, the emissions' campaign, the Roadside Technical Inspection and the Roadside Emissions Test of the Local Enforcement Scheme.
For the VRT, only 1.2 per cent of the tested vehicles were found to have excessive emissions, with the highest risks emanating from diesel engines, commercial and vehicles aged eight years and over.
The audit revealed the VRT compliance effect diminished substantially soon after passing this test.
Inspections to ascertain that VRT stations conducted tests in accordance with the regulations were not fully adequate or risk-based, it found. The alert campaign had been successful in raising public awareness, bringing about enforcement and reducing vehicle emissions, according to the report.
The roadside emissions' test and the technical inspections, intended to ensure owners maintain their vehicles in a roadworthy condition at all times, were able to identify a significant number of vehicles with excessive emissions.
Non-compliant vehicles were detected throughout all vehicle age groups and engine capacities. However, the roadside testing regime did not adequately target petrol engine vehicles because the latter's emissions tend to be invisible, albeit very harmful. Moreover, roadside emissions' tests were suspended last year as the ADT sought to limit the conduct of emission testing to certified testers.







RSS
Comments
Until then, don't waste your breath, because we're not listening to you. Frankly, we couldn't give two hoots about you, we're alright and that's all that matters.
Anke jien m'iniex ser nirraporta iktar - ihammgu kemm iridu - il-flus inzommhom ghalija mela noqghod naghti kaz x'jaghmlu n-nies...biex umbat gustizzja ma ssirx...hraqtuni man
So what are all those people in uniform doing stopping vans and trucks on dangerous junctions or corners, when they should be giving an example.
Another case in point is wardens stopping drivers on roundabouts. Don't they know such elementary things as " you don't stop on a roundabout" ?
You increased our road car taxes, because our cars are old and you claim that they harm the enviroment, but what about the incompetence of the ADT which allows everyone else to polute our air,
'
It is still a two tier system Malta, those who obey the rules and those who are allowed by ADT to get away with breaking the law!
When a SMS is sent to the ADT, who receives it?
Does this person then forward the information to someone else? How often?
How many people are in this chain (from receiving SMS to sending out notices to vehicle owner)?
If there is a slight suspicion that there is someone in this chain of people is illegally collaborating with third parties, will police investigate?
How many SMSs were received on a monthly basis from when the Emission alert started?
When was the last notice sent?
Do the group at ADT prepare a report for the Chairman?
What are the immediate plans for Emission Alert?
All we hear about is bribery, shoddy roads, lack of planning, scandals, inefficiency, delays, lack of transparency, pollution................bah! Useless.
co
Finally... There should be a court case from all the maltese against the ADT so that any Damages we sustained in our vehicles, including health damages, are refunded to us by this so called "organisation" Where i don't see any organisation in it.
it's time that us Maltese wake up from our deep sleep.
To make our roads cleaner by following reported cases, they didn't have the resources!!!
SHAME!!!
Enforcement is this country's Achilles heel and it will remain so until it is made independent from political direction. Once politicians make laws, those laws should be enforced without fear or favour and regardless of what stage in the electoral cycle we happen to be in.
Only some time ago people were officially invited to report cases of harmful emission.The invitation was much publicised in the media. Why is it, now, that the reports received are not being followed up as one would expect? Could it be that ADT has too much on its plate? I do not want to think that the response they received was much higher that what they had initially bargained for. It would be interesting to hear the reason why from the horse's mouth .
I am not surprised though if they do not bother to reply
Sometimes i get the impression that some authorities may feel too smug living in a Disneyland , where all they want to do ( or make believe) comes true, without their having to bother that the laws and regulations on the statute book are properly observed !
We expect an explanation from ADT ,
And it falls under the responsibility of the loudest minister there is! Now what was it that makes most noise?
Good Job!
Now I owe an apology to my friends and to myself too.
Please forgive me - I should have known better what to expect from this country
It is clear to many that ADT has taken the general public for a ride, hiding behind the 'smokescreen' of its EMS Alert Campaign. As usually, I am confident that no one will be held accountable for such gross omissions and public deceit .
Is this the leap in the quality of life that we were promised before the EU membership? it seem to me that we are again moving back to the future becoming more of a banana republic rather than an EU member State . Shame.
I was also one who held a beacon of hope everytime I reported some bus, van or truck belching black fumes into my baby's face and into mine. I only hope that the person(s) responsible for this utter disgrace suffer first-handedly the effects these noxious fumes are having on our health. And if the EU can really sue Malta over this, then bring it on. I'll be there in the front seat with popcorn in hand, enjoying the show.
The ADT has not only wasted the public's time, but also the public's money.
I wonder what their reaction would be if I ignore their reminder for me to pay the road licence!
The ADT is yet another scourge in a spineless nation.
I gave up sending sms some time ago when they announced that only one in ten reports where followed through.Now it seems that was an exageration as well.
What we have on this Island is full blown anarchy. Everyone is prepared to go to work,spend eight or so hours doing very little and go to their second job where they can earn good money doing something else,usually not very well. This mentality follows from the principal officers to the lowly clerk. Everyone scratches each other's back and the culture of 'I'm alright Jack' gathers momentum as it is handed down from generation to generation . It's not only immoral but illegal. What we need are Ministers who are not afraid of losing votes and are prepared to take the bull by it's horns and start sacking.
From the enforcement side; if every vehicle was tested and taken off the road until passing the test, the roads would be virtually empty of public transport, government and commercial vehicles. Effectively Malta would grind to a halt.
This non action will certainly discourage anyone for tackling the issue in future!